NTSB CAROL · Event
Event CEN14FA396
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's failure to establish a stabilized approach and to maintain airspeed during final approach over obstacles resulting in a stall/mush.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHTOn July 30, 2014, about 1500 central daylight time, an experimental amateur-built Render RV 9A airplane, N82PR, impacted terrain near the approach end of a runway at the Gallinger Airport (51WI), near Oshkosh, Wisconsin. The private pilot and passenger were seriously injured. The airplane sustained substantial damage. The airplane was registered to and operated by the pilot under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a personal flight. Day visual flight rules conditions prevailed for the flight, which did not operate on a flight plan. The flight originated from the Albertus Airport (FEP), near Freeport, Illinois, about 1400. According to the pilot's accident report, he departed about 0830 from Bowling Green, Kentucky, and flew to West Plaines, Missouri, where he refueled the airplane and picked up a passenger. He flew the airplane to Freeport, Illinois, and refueled the airplane there. A copy of fuel receipts from the fixed base operator at FEP showed the airplane was serviced with 22.1 gallons of 100 low lead aviation gasoline about 1342 on July 30, 2014. He then flew the airplane to 51WI. The pilot reported that the winds favored "runway 18" at 51WI. He entered a left downwind leg for the runway. He turned left base and then an "abbreviated final" to avoid airspace over a prison located north of the runway. The pilot added that the airplane was descending at the "usual rate" and the controls subsequently "got mushy." The airplane impacted terrain at the approach end of the runway. He indicated that he woke up when first responders arrived and did not remember the impact. PERSONNEL INFORMATIONThe pilot held a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) private pilot certificate with airplane single-engine land rating. FAA records showed that the pilot held a third-class medical certificate with a limitation for corrective lenses. The pilot reported that he had accumulated 503 hours of total flight time and 428 hours of flight time in the same make and model as the accident airplane. He stated that he had accumulated 14 hours of flight time in the 90 days prior to the accident and 7 hours of flight time in 30 days prior to the accident. AIRCRAFT INFORMATIONN82PR was an experimental amateur-built Render RV 9A single engine, two-seat, low-wing, kit airplane with serial number 487. The airplane was powered by a 150-horsepower, Lycoming O-320-E2D engine with serial number L-20024-27A. A special airworthiness certificate was issued for the airplane on July 23, 2003. A condition inspection on the airplane was completed on June 16, 2014. The pilot reported that the airplane had accumulated 595 hours of total flight time at the time of the accident. He further indicated in his accident report that there were no mechanical malfunctions in reference to the accident flight. METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATIONAt 1513, the recorded weather about five miles and 180 degrees from the accident site at the Wittman Regional Airport, near Oshkosh, Wisconsin, was: Wind variable at 6 knots; visibility 10 statute miles; sky condition clear; temperature 23 degrees C; dew point 11 degrees C; altimeter 30.02 inches of mercury. AIRPORT INFORMATIONN82PR was an experimental amateur-built Render RV 9A single engine, two-seat, low-wing, kit airplane with serial number 487. The airplane was powered by a 150-horsepower, Lycoming O-320-E2D engine with serial number L-20024-27A. A special airworthiness certificate was issued for the airplane on July 23, 2003. A condition inspection on the airplane was completed on June 16, 2014. The pilot reported that the airplane had accumulated 595 hours of total flight time at the time of the accident. He further indicated in his accident report that there were no mechanical malfunctions in reference to the accident flight. WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATIONA ground scar near the approach end of a southbound runway at 51WI was about 13 feet long and the scar ended by a depression consistent with an impact from a propeller. The dirt in the depression had a paint transfer consistent with the color of the propeller's back surface. The airplane and its right wing came to rest about 80 feet south of the depression. The heading from the depression to the airplane's nose landing gear (nlg) was about 200 degrees magnetic. The airplane fragmented along this heading and debris was found along this path. A section of the left wing tip was found about 73 feet north of the nlg and the left wing tip's navigation light was found about 69 feet north of the nlg. Sections of clear plastic and the left aileron were found about 61 feet north of the nlg. The left wing was found separated from its fuselage about 45 feet north of the nlg. The two-bladed fixed pitch propeller remained attached to the engine. One propeller blade exhibited chordwise abrasion, s-shaped bending, and leading edge gouges. The outboard third of the other propeller blade was bent forward and it exhibited chordwise abrasion. Throttle, carburetor heat, and mixture controls were found in their forward positions. The engine controls were moved by hand in the cockpit and continuity was established when their other ends were observed to move correspondingly. The control stick was manipulated by hand and the right aileron and elevators were observed to move accordingly. The rudder pedals were manipulated by hand and the rudder moved accordingly. The left wing's push-pull tube separated from its end, near the fuselage's wing root. The section of the push-pull tube within the fuselage moved in correct sequence to the control stick's movement and all push-pull tube separations were consistent with overload. Engine and airplane control continuity was established. A liquid consistent with the color and smell of aviation gasoline was observed in the right fuel tank. ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONThe FAA Airplane Flying Handbook, in part, stated: The base leg is the transitional part of the traffic pattern between the downwind leg and the final approach leg. Depending on the wind condition, it is established at a sufficient distance from the approach end of the landing runway to permit a gradual descent to the intended touchdown point. ... The final approach leg is a descending flightpath starting from the completion of the base-to-final turn and extending to the point of touchdown. This is probably the most important leg of the entire pattern, because here the pilot's judgment and procedures must be the sharpest to accurately control the airspeed and descent angle while approaching the intended touchdown point. The pilot's safety recommendation, in part, stated: The close location of the prison and the power lines on the north end of the airstrip forces pilots to make a short final but still stay high to avoid power lines. Maybe I should have landed to the north, even with a tailwind. The pilot was landing the airplane at a privately-owned airport. He elected to land to the south on a turf runway that the wind favored. He turned onto left base and then to an "abbreviated final" to avoid airspace over a prison and power lines located north of the runway. The pilot said that the airplane was descending at the "usual rate," but the controls subsequently "got mushy." The airplane impacted terrain at the approach end of the runway. The pilot indicated in his accident report that there were no mechanical malfunctions in reference to the accident flight. No mechanical anomalies were detected during an on-scene investigation, and witness marks were consistent with the engine producing power at impact. The runway the pilot selected was not published in the Federal Aviation Administration's airport master record at the time of the accident, and, therefore, no obstructions were listed for this runway in the airport master record. The pilot's safety recommendation stated, in part, "the close location of the prison and the power lines on the north end of the airstrip forces pilots to make a short final but still stay high to avoid power lines. Maybe I should have landed to the north, even with a tailwind." The pilot most likely did not establish a stabilized approach and did not maintain the airplane's airspeed during the "abbreviated final" approach south of the prison and above the power lines, which resulted in a stall/mush. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Airspeed-Not attained/maintained - C
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Pilot - C
- — Environmental issues-Operating environment-Airport facilities/design-(general)-Contributed to outcome
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2014_CEN14FA396.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER)
Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗