NTSB CAROL · Event
Event CEN15LA177
Registry · N87EV
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
ERCOUPE 415-C
Year of manufacture
1946 · 69 years old at event
Engine
CONT MOTOR A&C75 SERIES (75 hp)
Seats / Engines
2 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
19550921
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S ABF475
Registrant of record
ILLINOIS ERCOUPE FLYERS LLC
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The loss of engine power during the go-around due to fuel contamination.
Factual narrative
On March 7, 2015, about 1500 central daylight time, an Ercoupe 415-C airplane, N87EV, impacted terrain during a forced landing following a loss of engine power during a go-around near the St Louis Metro-East Airport/Shafer Field (3K6), St Jacob, Illinois. The private pilot was uninjured. The airplane sustained substantial firewall and wing damage. The airplane was registered to an individual and operated by the pilot under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a ferry flight. Day visual flight rules conditions prevailed for the flight, which did not operate on a flight plan. The flight originated from the A Paul Vance Fredericktown Regional Airport (H88), near Fredericktown, Missouri, about 1400.The pilot stated in his accident report that he was flying the accident airplane under a ferry permit from H88 to Sackman Field Airport (H49), near Columbia, Illinois. However, due to unsafe runway conditions at H49, 3K6 was chosen as an alternate airport. Upon arrival at 3K6, the pilot executed an aborted landing. He applied engine power and climbed about 150-200 feet. The engine lost power without any "coughing" or warning. At 1358, the recorded weather at the Scott Air Force Base/MidAmerica Airport, near Belleville, Illinois, was: Wind 230 degrees at 2 knots; visibility 10 statute miles; sky condition clear; temperature 18 degrees C; dew point 1 degree C; altimeter 30.13 inches of mercury. A Federal Aviation Administration inspector examined the accident airplane. He observed that the fuel exiting from the header fuel tank was not aviation gasoline. The inspector observed the accident airplane during a subsequent engine run. The engine started, ran rough, and it would not accelerate smoothly when it was fed fuel from the header tank containing fuel from the accident flight. The header tank was drained and fresh aviation gasoline was added to the tank. The engine ran smoothly and accelerated normally. The pilot reported that he was flying the accident airplane under a ferry permit to the destination airport. However, due to unsafe runway conditions at the destination, he chose to land at an alternate airport nearby. Upon arrival at the alternate airport, the pilot executed an aborted landing. He applied engine power and climbed the airplane to about 150 to 200 ft and then the engine lost power without any warning. During the forced landing, the airplane sustained substantial wing and firewall damage. During a postaccident engine run using the header tank fuel from the accident flight, the engine started, ran roughly, and would not accelerate smoothly. The header tank was drained, and fresh aviation fuel was added to the tank; the engine then ran smoothly and accelerated normally. The engine likely lost power due to contaminated fuel. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Aircraft-Fluids/misc hardware-Fluids-Fuel-Fluid condition
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2015_CEN15LA177.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (fuel contamination, go-around). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper
A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research)
Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace)
Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗