NTSB CAROL · Event
Event CEN15LA322
Registry · N1396X
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
BELL 47G-4A
Year of manufacture
1967 · 48 years old at event
TCDS
2H3 · SCOTT'S-BELL 47 INC
Engine
LYCOMING VO-540 SERIES (310 hp)
Seats / Engines
3 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
19691010
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A09FE0
Registrant of record
HAMMOCK FLYING SERVICE INC
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The total loss of engine power due to fuel starvation because the available fuel shifted within the tanks due to an abrupt nose-low maneuver to avoid an obstacle, which resulted in a hard forced landing.
Factual narrative
On July 24, 2015, about 1800 central daylight time, a Bell 47G 4A helicopter, N1396X, made a forced landing after a loss of engine power near Gilbert, Iowa. The commercial rated pilot and sole occupant was not injured. The helicopter sustained substantial damage. The helicopter was registered to and operated by Fly Right Heli LLC, Adel, Iowa, under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 137 as an aerial application flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident and no flight plan was filed. The pilot reported he was returning to his truck to refill the helicopter with more application. While flying about 150 ft above ground level, he maneuvered the helicopter upward to avoid an obstacle. During the maneuver he rapidly pitched the nose up to climb and then pitched the nose down to a steep angle of descent. When the helicopter entered the nose low attitude, the engine experienced a total loss of power. The pilot made a forced landing to a corn field. The pilot reported no mechanical malfunctions with the helicopter. The pilot speculated the loss of engine power was attributed to the nose low attitude which allowed the fuel to shift in the tanks and starve the engine of fuel. He also reported that he never flew the helicopter with less than one quarter of the fuel tanks full (about 15.25 gallons). The responding Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspectors conducted a postaccident examination of the helicopter and an engine test run. The helicopter's rotor blades, fuselage and tailboom sustained impact related damage. Due to the impact damage, a flight control check could not be accomplished. During the test run, the engine operated normally and no anomalies were noted. The inspectors recovered 11 to 12 gallons of aviation gasoline from the fuel tanks. The helicopter's flight manual indicated that the helicopter is capable of carrying 61 total gallons of fuel, 57.5 useable gallons. A review of the maintenance records revealed that an annual inspection was completed on July 1, 2015. The same logbook entry indicated that an engine overhaul and 1,200 hour inspection were completed on the transmission and main rotor mast. A review of the helicopter's flight manual yielded no limitation on minimum fuel or limitations of maneuvers due to low fuel quantity. The helicopter's Type Certificate owner stated that if the helicopter was low on fuel and then put into an abrupt nose low attitude, it's possible that the engine was starved of fuel. The commercial pilot was conducting an aerial application flight. The pilot reported that, while about 150 ft above ground level, he rapidly pitched the nose up to avoid an obstacle and then pitched it nose down to a steep descent angle. When the helicopter entered the nose-low attitude, the engine experienced a total loss of power. The pilot subsequently made a forced landing to a corn field. The pilot reported that he thought the loss of engine power might have been due to the nose-low attitude, which allowed the fuel to shift in the tanks and starve the engine of fuel. He also reported that he never flew the helicopter with less than one quarter of the fuel tanks full (about 15.25 gallons). The helicopter's type certificate holder also noted that, if the helicopter was low on fuel and then put into an abrupt nose-low attitude, the engine could be starved of fuel. During the postaccident examination, 11 to 12 gallons of fuel were drained from the tanks. An engine test run was conducted with no abnormalities noted. Based on the evidence, it is likely that the engine was starved of available fuel due to the rapid and steep descent, which shifted the fuel in the tanks. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Fuel system-(general)-Capability exceeded - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Fuel system-(general)-Design - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2015_CEN15LA322.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (fuel starvation, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Just Culture in Aviation: A Metaphorical Study on Aircraft Maintenance Students
Just Culture, a sub-dimension of safety culture, has been a prominent and debated topic in aviation safety in recent years.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Performance PRISM: A Comprehensive Framework For Performance Measurement In Aircraft Maintenance
Aircraft maintenance is governed by rigorous safety requirements and high operational complexity, demanding robust performance measurement frameworks to ensure optimal maintenance practices.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗