NTSB CAROL · Event
Event CEN16LA175
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The student pilot's failure to maintain the appropriate pitch attitude during initial climb, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall. Contributing to the accident was the student pilot’s decision to conduct a solo flight without a solo endorsement in an aircraft in which he had no experience flying.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHT
On May 8, 2016, about 1025 central daylight time, an Airborne Windsport Edge X Classic weight-shift control aircraft, N701FP, impacted terrain at Rush City Airport (ROS), Rush City, Minnesota. The student pilot, the sole occupant on board, was fatally injured. The aircraft was substantially damaged. The aircraft was registered to and operated by the pilot of Pine City, Minnesota, under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a personal flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident, and no flight plan had been filed. The local flight was originating at the time of the accident. According to a video provided by the Chisago County Sheriff's Office, the aircraft took off on runway 16, climbed to an estimated altitude of 300 to 400 feet, banked sharply to the left, descended, and impacted terrain in a steep nose-down attitude. The engine could be heard producing power at impact. Examination of the wreckage revealed no evidence of pre-impact mechanical malfunctions or failures. PERSONNEL (CREW) INFORMATION The pilot held a student pilot certificate with no solo endorsements. He also held a third class airman medical certificate, dated April 7, 2016, with the restriction, "Must have available glasses for near vision." Examination of the pilot's flight logbook revealed 13 entries made from March 22, to May 6, 2016. The entries indicated the pilot had logged a total of 21.9 hours – 4.6 hours in a Cessna 172, 3.3 hours in a Cessna 150, and 14.0 in an Air Creation USA ARV TANARG, another weight-shift-control aircraft similar to N701FP. The latter flights occurred at Marana Regional Airport (AVQ), Marana, Arizona, between April 18 and April 20. The accident flight was the first flight the pilot had made in N701FP. He had not flown a weight-shift control aircraft since April 20. He did, however, take a lesson in a Cessna 172 two days before the accident. A Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector telephoned the pilot's flight instructor in Marana, Arizona. The instructor told the inspector that he did not feel the pilot was ready to solo; therefore, he did not endorse him for solo flight in his pilot logbook. The instructor stated the pilot mismanaged takeoffs and landings, and had the tendency to "leave the bar out" after takeoff "instead of letting it come back," causing the aircraft to increase pitch attitude and climb steeply. The instructor said that control in a weight-shift aircraft differs from that of a conventional airplane. To climb, you push the control bar forward and to descend, you pull back on the control bar. The instructor said this tends to be an issue for new pilots, especially those who are mixing their training between fixed wing airplanes and weight shift control aircraft. The instructor added that there is a considerable difference in the performance of the aircraft with just one person on board in that it will climb at a considerably greater rate when flown solo.
MEDICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL INFORMATION
According to the autopsy report, prepared by the Midwest Medical Examiner's Office, death was attributed to "multiple blunt force injuries." According to FAA's Civil Aeromedical Institute's (CAMI) toxicology report, no carbon monoxide or ethanol were detected in cavity blood or vitreous, respectively. Ranitidine was detected in urine. According to FAA's Forensic Toxicology, ranitidine is an anti-histamine used in the treatment of gastric acid secretion. According to the Midwest Medical Examiner's toxicology report, ranitidine and caffeine were detected in urine. The student pilot was conducting a solo personal flight in the weight-shift-control aircraft. Video footage showed the airplane taking off, climbing to an estimated altitude of 300 to 400 ft, banking sharply left, descending, and then impacting terrain in a steep, nose-down attitude. The student did not have any solo endorsements on his student pilot certificate. The student had logged 14 hours in a different weight-shift-control aircraft but had never flown the accident aircraft type. The student's flight instructor said that he did not feel the student was ready to fly solo and that he had not endorsed him for solo flight. He further stated that the student mismanaged takeoffs and landings and had the tendency to "leave the [control] bar out" after takeoff instead of letting it come back, which increased the aircraft's pitch attitude and caused it to climb too steeply. It is likely that the student increased the aircraft's pitch attitude too much during the initial climb, which led to his loss of aircraft control and an aerodynamic stall. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Pilot - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Pitch control-Incorrect use/operation - C
- F Personnel issues-Experience/knowledge-Experience/qualifications-Qualification/certification-Pilot - F
- F Personnel issues-Experience/knowledge-Experience/qualifications-Total experience-Pilot - F
- F Personnel issues-Experience/knowledge-Experience/qualifications-Total experience w/ equipment-Pilot - F
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2016_CEN16LA175.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER)
Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗