NTSB CAROL · Event
Event CEN16LA363
Registry · N4513S
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
CGS AVIATION HAWK ARROW II
Engine
BOMBARDIER ROTAX (ALL)
Seats / Engines
2 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
20030703
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A578A5
Registrant of record
BARRY JOHN J
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The improper installation of quick release connectors in the fuel lines, which was not in accordance with the engine manufacturer's maintenance instructions and allowed air to be introduced into the fuel system and resulted in a partial loss of engine power. Also causal to the accident was the pilot's failure to maintain adequate airspeed and exceedance of the airplane's critical angle of attack, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall and impact with power lines.
Factual narrative
On September 3, 2016, at 1830 eastern daylight time, an experimental light sport CGS Aviation Hawk Aero II airplane, N4513S, collided with power line(s) and terrain during an en route climb following takeoff from Park Township Airport (HLM), Holland, Michigan. The airplane was destroyed. The pilot sustained serious injuries. The airplane was registered to and operated by the pilot under 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a personal flight that was not operating on a flight plan. Day visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The local flight was originating at the time of the accident. A National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Pilot/Operator Accident/Incident Report (form 6120.1) was not received from the pilot. The pilot, who was the airplane owner, stated in a telephone conversation with the NTSB Investigator-In-Charge, that the engine never stopped running and was not running at a high engine speed. During the climbout after takeoff, the engine started to sputter about 80-100 feet above ground level. The airplane "started stalling," so he pushed the nose down to increase airplane airspeed to recover from the aerodynamic stall. He said that if the airplane had not hit the power line(s), he would not have been involved in an accident. Post-accident examination of the airplane and an engine run were performed at the pilot's hangar by a representative from the engine manufacturer and by the Federal Aviation Administration Coordinator for the accident. The engine was a Rotax 582 MOD 99, serial number 543 7309. The examination revealed that all the spark plugs were NGK BR8ES that had removable resistor caps, which was not in accordance with the engine manufacturer's maintenance manual. The spark plug gaps were 0.29 - 0.30 inch (the engine maintenance manual specifies a gap size of 0.020 inch). All the spark plugs' electrodes exhibited a color consistent with a rich fuel mixture. The number 4-cylinder spark plug on the magneto side of the engine was loose and did not meet the torque specification in accordance with the engine manufacturer's maintenance manual. The power takeoff and magneto sides of the engine had both carburetors equipped with larger main jets, which were 190 size jets instead of the engine manufacturer's original equipment, which were 165 size jets (higher jet numbers equate to a richer mixtures). Both carburetor chokes were blocked off and removed from service. Both jet needles clip positions were in the number 4 position and not in the number 3 position, as specified in the engine manufacturer's maintenance manual. There were no fuel filters installed between the fuel pumps and carburetors as specified in the engine manufacturer's maintenance manual. The pneumatic fuel pump was found installed on the engine with the small drain hole near the impulse connection, positioned horizontally. The engine manufacturer's maintenance manual states that "The fuel pump should be installed in a cool place (not on the engine itself), with the small drain hole near the impulse connection towards the bottom. This hole drains oil condensate from the pump diaphragm chamber". The gascolator was installed with industrial style (non-airplane) brass plumbing fittings and an industrial style (non-airplane) shut-off valve. Plumbers thread seal tape was present on the threads of the fuel line fittings. There was no fire sleeve on any of the fuel lines. The fuel header tank was a white plastic container that was consistent with a water jug. The threaded cap of the header tank had a fuel system quick release type connector attached with a pick-up tube that extended to the bottom of the container. When the quick release type connector was tested, it leaked a substantial amount of air into the fuel system. The engine manufacturer's maintenance manual stated: "Quick release type connectors can cause air leaks and produce fuel flow restrictions and possible blockage sites" "the tiniest flaw in any joint will cause air to be sucked into the fuel system, considerably reducing the capacity of the fuel pump. Air leaks are much more dangerous when the fuel tank is mounted below the fuel pump and carburetors" The engine was run for several minutes with multiple throttle inputs during which no anomalies in engine power occurred. Following the accident, the engine manufacturer issued a publication, "Two-Stroke Safety Issues", which in part discussed fuel system air leaks and the use of quick release connectors in the fuel system. The private pilot stated that the experimental light sport airplane experienced a partial loss of engine power during climb after takeoff about 80 to100 ft above ground level. The airplane entered an aerodynamic stall, so the pilot decreased the pitch attitude to recover, but the airplane then impacted power lines. Postaccident examination of the engine revealed numerous items that had not been performed in accordance with the engine manufacturer's maintenance instructions, one of which was the correct installation of a quick release connector in the fuel lines. When the quick release connector was tested, it leaked a substantial amount of air into the fuel system; therefore, it is likely that air entered the fuel system during the flight and resulted in the partial loss of engine power. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine fuel and control-Fuel distribution-Incorrect service/maintenance - C
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Maintenance-Installation-Maintenance personnel - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Airspeed-Attain/maintain not possible - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Angle of attack-Capability exceeded - C
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Pilot - C
- C Environmental issues-Physical environment-Object/animal/substance-Wire-Effect on operation - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2016_CEN16LA363.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗