NTSB CAROL · Event
Event CEN21LA222
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The fatigue failure of the carburetor throttle control cable, which resulted in a partial loss of engine control.
Factual narrative
On May 17, 2021, about 2000 central daylight time, a Flight Design GMBH CLTS, N521CT, was involved in an accident near Racine, Wisconsin. The airplane was destroyed. The student pilot received minor injuries. The airplane was operated under Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as an instructional flight. The student pilot stated that she departed from Batten International Airport (RAC), Racine, Wisconsin, at 1741, enroute to Burlington Municipal Airport (BUU), Burlington, Wisconsin, for a solo cross-country flight. The flight to BUU was uneventful until the student pilot reduced engine power in the BUU airport traffic pattern and encountered a severe engine vibration. The student pilot returned to RAC and attempted three landings on runway 14 but initiated go-arounds due to excessive airspeed and the vibration that occurred when the engine throttle was reduced. The student pilot stated that during the fourth landing attempt, the airplane touched down with too much energy and bounced several times on runway 14. The student pilot aborted the landing and attempted a climb by adding full engine power, but the airspeed decreased. The student pilot then headed toward a field to land the airplane, but it hit trees, a powerline, and a house. The airplane came to rest inverted, and the pilot was able to egress from the airplane without further incident. The airplane was destroyed by impact forces that resulted in numerous fractures through the composite fuselage, damage to the wings, and damage to the empennage. Postaccident examination revealed that the throttle cable leading to the right carburetor was fractured and separated at the carburetor’s throttle control arm. The throttle cable leading to the left carburetor and a cable that interconnected the right carburetor throttle control arm to the left carburetor control arm were intact and secure. The carburetor’s throttle control arms were spring loaded to the full open throttle position if a cable failure occurred. The left carburetor control cable could be swiveled at its throttle control arm attachment. The right throttle control cable could not be swiveled on its throttle control arm attachment. The right carburetor throttle cable appeared to be crushed near the fracture, which was at the aft/cockpit side of the throttle control arm. Metallurgical examination of the separated portion of the control cable that remained attached to the throttle control arm clamping bolt revealed deformation to the cable consistent with the clamping location along the cable having been adjusted at some previous time. The act of clamping the control cable to the throttle lever imparts deformation and bending to the cable when it becomes squeezed between the bearing surfaces of the clamping bolt head and captive washer. Close examination of the bearing surfaces on both the clamping bolt head and the captive washer revealed that there were imprints of the cable’s wires depressed into the bearing surfaces. The interference between the control cable and the bearing surfaces of this fixation design resulted in a tightly focused clamping force on the cable where it entered and exited the cross-drilled hole of the clamping bolt resulting in deformation of the cable and its individual wires. This deformation of the wires reduced their diameter and created stress risers that were susceptible to the formation of fatigue cracks. Scanning electron microscopy of the fractured ends of the throttle control cable revealed fracture features exhibiting crack progression marks consistent with fatigue fractures. During a solo cross-country flight, the student pilot returned to the departure airport after the engine began to vibrate when power was reduced. She attempted three landings that were aborted due to excessive airspeed. During the fourth landing attempt, the airplane touched down fast and bounced several times on the runway. The student pilot aborted the landing and added full engine power to climb, but the airspeed decreased. The airplane collided with a tree and a building and was destroyed by impact forces. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed that one of the two throttle control cables had separated from its carburetor at the control arm. The cable separation from the carburetor resulted in the carburetor’s spring-loaded throttle control moving to full throttle while the second carburetor would have been at a position selected by the cockpit throttle control. When the pilot reduced the cockpit throttle control for landing, the carburetor with the broken cable would have continued operating at maximum throttle regardless of the cockpit throttle control position, which likely resulted in the engine vibration and the excessive airspeed for landing. Metallurgical examination of the separated control cable revealed that a tightly focused clamping force on the carburetor cable attachment bolt resulted in fatigue failure of the cable. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- — Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine fuel and control-Fuel control/carburetor-Failure
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2021_CEN21LA222.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper
A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research)
Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace)
Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗