NTSB CAROL · Event
Event CEN22LA253
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A total loss of engine power due to an engine fire that resulted from failure of the turbocharger exhaust clamp, which allowed hot exhaust gases to damage other vital engine components.
Factual narrative
On June 16, 2022, about 1400 central daylight time, a Cessna T206H, N52854, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Austin, Texas. The pilot was seriously injured. The airplane was operated as a public use flight. The pilot reported that the accident flight was the first flight following a 100-hour maintenance inspection. The pilot departed from the Austin-Bergstrom International Airport (AUS), Austin, Texas, and shortly after takeoff reported to air traffic control that there was smoke in the cockpit and he wanted to return to AUS. Shortly thereafter, the smoke increased, and the pilot was not able to see his instrument panel. He attempted to increase engine power and discovered that the engine had stopped producing power. After opening the airplane’s side windows, he could see a body of water below him and ditched the airplane into Lady Bird Lake, near Austin. Postaccident examination revealed that the V-band exhaust coupling securing the turbocharger exhaust fractured. The General Aviation Joint Steering Committee issued a “Best Practices Guide for Maintaining Exhaust System Turbocharger to Tailpipe v-band Couplings / Clamps”, which recommended life limits for the various styles of clamps including a 500-hour life limit on spot welded v-band couplings such as the failed coupling from the accident airplane. Figure 1. Photo of failed V-band exhaust coupling. The Federal Aviation Administration issued a Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin (SAIB), CE-18-07, on December 14, 2017, which described several accidents that resulted from v-band clamp failures. The SAIB recommended detailed inspections of v-band exhaust couplings be performed at 100-hour intervals. It also identified areas of concern and locations on the v-band exhaust couplings for focused inspection. In April 2018, the General Aviation Joint Steering Committee issued a “Best Practices Guide for Maintaining Exhaust System Turbocharger to Tailpipe V-band Couplings / Clamps”, which went into further detail concerning the various designs of exhaust system couplings, and inspection of those couplings. The guide also recommended life limits for the various styles of clamps including a 500-hour life limit on spot welded v-band couplings such as the failed coupling from the accident airplane. According to maintenance records, the airplane’s most recent annual inspection was completed on December 13, 2021, and indicated that an exhaust system inspection was included in the inspection process. A 100-hour inspection was completed on June 15, 2022, and indicated that an exhaust system inspection had been performed. Neither entry specifically noted inspection of the v-band exhaust couplings and the investigation was unable to determine if a specific inspection of the v-band clamp was accomplished. The total time in service of the clamp was not determined. The pilot reported that shortly after takeoff he experienced smoke in the cockpit. The pilot reported to air traffic control that he wanted to return to the airport; however, the amount of smoke continued to increase and the engine stopped producing power. The pilot opened the side windows and located a lake below him into which he ditched the airplane. Postaccident examination revealed that the v-band clamp securing the turbocharger exhaust fractured and allowed hot exhaust gas to blow over the accessory section of the engine. The hot exhaust gases caused damage to several components, resulting in a fire and total loss of engine power. The Federal Aviation Administration issued a Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin (SAIB), CE-18-07, recommending detailed inspections of v-band exhaust couplings be performed at 100-hour intervals. The accident occurred on the first flight following a 100-hr inspection that indicated an examination of the exhaust system. The investigation did not determine the total time in service of the clamp or whether a specific examination of the v-band clamp was accomplished. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- — Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine exhaust-(general)-Failure
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2022_CEN22LA253.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Just Culture in Aviation: A Metaphorical Study on Aircraft Maintenance Students
Just Culture, a sub-dimension of safety culture, has been a prominent and debated topic in aviation safety in recent years.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Performance PRISM: A Comprehensive Framework For Performance Measurement In Aircraft Maintenance
Aircraft maintenance is governed by rigorous safety requirements and high operational complexity, demanding robust performance measurement frameworks to ensure optimal maintenance practices.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗