NTSB CAROL · Event
Event CEN23LA267
Registry · N123SM
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
CESSNA 421
Year of manufacture
1968 · 55 years old at event
Engine
CONT MOTOR GTSIO-520-C (340 hp)
Seats / Engines
8 seats · 2 engines
Last airworthiness date
19681231
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A06073
Registrant of record
FERNAIR LLC
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The failure of the left engine starter adapter gear, which resulted in catastrophic damage to other engine components, and the subsequent loss of engine power.
Factual narrative
On June 24, 2023, about 1615 central daylight time, a Cessna 421 airplane, N123SM, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Rockport, Texas. The pilot and three passengers were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot reported that he had flown the airplane from the West Houston Airport (IWS), Houston, Texas, to the Corpus Christi International Airport (CRP), Corpus Christi, Texas, where he picked up the airplane owner and his friends for a return flight to IWS. He stated that they loaded 130 gallons of fuel while at CRP. Recorded ADS-B data indicated that the airplane departed CRP about 1545 and headed northeast. The pilot reported that once the airplane reached 6,000 ft msl, the left engine tachometer generator went offline but the engine still operated normally. However, about 2 minutes later, the left engine lost power and the airplane banked left. The pilot attempted to stabilize the airplane with aileron and rudder control, but the airplane entered a spin. He moved both throttles to idle, applied right rudder, and was able to regain control of the airplane. After leveling off, the right engine had stopped and the propeller was not windmilling. The left engine was not producing power but the propeller was windmilling. The pilot activated the left engine boost pump to the high setting and looked for areas to land while turning toward the nearest suitable airport; he then executed a forced landing to a field. After the accident, a test run of the right engine was performed; the right engine was able to run and produced rated engine power during the test run. A teardown examination of the left engine revealed that the starter adapter gear had failed. The failure stripped the teeth off the accessory gears, including the camshaft drive gear. The starter adapter was the subject of FAA Airworthiness Directive 2007-05-15, which was issued “to prevent failure of the starter adapter assembly and or crankshaft gear, resulting in failure of the engine and possible forced landing.” The AD required compliance with Continental Motors Mandatory Service Bulletin (SB) MSB94-4H. The SB detailed inspection and replacement procedures for the starter adapter assembly and crankshaft gear. Part 1 of the SB required various inspections if rough engine operation was detected. Part 2 of the SB detailed a visual backlash check of the viscous damper installed on the starter adapter while the starter adapter was still installed on the engine. Part 2 was to be complied with every 100 hours of engine operation and was to ensure that excessive wear was not present on the gears of the crankshaft or starter adapter gears. Part 3 of the SB required removal and visual inspection of the starter adapter and gear at 400 hour intervals. During the engine examinations, the backlash check described in part 2 of the SB was performed on the airplane’s intact right engine and excessive backlash was not detected. Damage precluded performing the check on the left engine. Examination of the airplane’s maintenance records showed that part 2 of the SB had been complied with on June 2, 2023, on both engines during the airplane’s annual inspection. According to recorded engine monitor data, the airplane had completed 7 flights and 10 hours of flight time since the annual inspection. On the right engine, part 3 of the SB was complied with by replacement of the starter adapter on June 10, 2020. On the left engine, the starter adapter was removed, inspected and placed back in service on June 20, 2020, about 100 hours before the accident. There was no maintenance record for 2022 in the maintenance records reviewed. The mechanic that performed the SB reported that on the most recent annual inspection he performed part 2 of the SB and the readings were well within the specified limits listed in the SB. He noted that he had performed this check many times in the past and did not find the procedure difficult, just that it required patience to perform the checks. The pilot reported that, while climbing through 6,000 ft above mean sea level (msl), the left engine tachometer generator went offline but the engine was still operating normally. He stated that about 2 minutes later, the left engine lost power and the airplane banked left. He attempted to stabilize the airplane with aileron and rudder control, but the airplane entered a spin. The pilot was able to regain control, but after the spin the right engine’s propeller was stopped and the left engine’s propeller was windmilling. The pilot executed a forced landing to a field and the airplane sustained substantial damage to the horizontal stabilizer. During a postaccident engine test run, the right engine operated normally. Examination of the left engine revealed the starter adapter gear had failed, which resulted in damage to other engine components that rendered the engine inoperable. The starter adapter was subject to an FAA Airworthiness Directive (AD), and an associated manufacturer mandatory service bulletin (SB). Maintenance records indicated that the AD and SB had been complied with less than 1 month and 10 operating hours before the accident. The mechanic that performed the SB inspection reported that he had performed this test numerous times in the past and did not find the procedures difficult but required patience. He recalled that the backlash on both starter adapter assemblies were well within the limits specified in the SB. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- — Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine (reciprocating)-Recip eng rear section-Failure
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2023_CEN23LA267.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗