NTSB CAROL · Event
Event CEN24LA245
Registry · N47RT
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
BEECH A36
Year of manufacture
1997 · 27 years old at event
Engine
CONT MOTOR IO-550 SERIES (300 hp)
Seats / Engines
6 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
19971228
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A5C04A
Registrant of record
BAS PART SALES LLC
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A partial loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
Factual narrative
On June 30, 2024, about 1115 central daylight time, a Raytheon Aircraft Company A36, N47RT, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Land O’ Lakes, Wisconsin. The pilot and passenger sustained minor injuries. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot reported that, during the initial climb, the engine exhibited a partial loss of engine power. She executed a forced landing into trees off the departure end of the runway, which resulted in substantial damage to both wings and the fuselage. The pilot reported that the left fuel tank contained 30 gallons of fuel, and the right fuel tank contained 10 gallons of fuel. The pilot stated that she had selected the left fuel tank for takeoff. The fuel selector was found in the off position. Postaccident fuel levels were not confirmed on scene. The placard placed near the fuel selector states, “Do not take off if fuel quantity gages indicate in yellow band or with less than 13 gallons in each main tank.” The auxiliary fuel pump was found in the LOW position at the accident site. The pilot reported that it was positioned in the OFF position during the takeoff. A review of the maintenance records revealed that the most recent annual inspection was dated July 1, 2024, the day after the accident. The signing Authorized Inspector stated that the annual inspection was completed on June 29, 2024, and that he mis-dated the entry. A postaccident examination did not reveal any preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The wings had been removed for transport. The right fuel tank, main supply, and vent lines were tested with pressurized air and no obstructions were noted. The left fuel tank was ruptured during the accident sequence and the main fuel supply line was bent and disconnected; however, no obstructions were observed in the separated line. No obstructions were found in the left fuel tank vent line. The engine remained attached to the fuselage but was shifted forward and bent downward. The propeller remained attached to the engine and all three blades remained attached at the hub. All three blades were bent aft, one of which was bent midspan about 45°, consistent with little or little or no power being produced at the time of impact. Three postaccident engine runs were conducted. During the first engine run, the engine started, idled, and accelerated without hesitation. During the second engine test run, the auxiliary fuel pump was moved from the OFF to the LOW and HIGH switch positions while the engine operated near the red line, as indicated by the manifold pressure gauge. No noticeable changes were observed. When the throttle was reduced to about 1,000 RPM and the auxiliary fuel pump was in the LOW position, it ran slightly rough; in the HIGH position, the engine ran noticeably rougher. For the third engine run, a portable optical tachometer was used; when the engine ran at full power, the portable tachometer indicated a maximum rpm of 2,600. The fuel selector valve was tested with pressurized air from the left and right main fuel lines and no anomalies were found. The fuel pump, fuel control unit, and the fuel flow divider were tested at Continental Aerospace Technologies in Mobile, Alabama, and no anomalies were found that would have precluded the engine from producing the full rated horsepower. The pilot reported that, during the initial climb, the engine gradually lost power and the airplane could not climb. She executed a forced landing into trees off the departure end of the runway. During the forced landing, the airplane sustained substantial damage to both wings and fuselage. Postaccident examination of the fuel-injected engine and airframe revealed no evidence of any mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. Three postaccident engine runs were conducted and no mechanical anomalies were observed that would have precluded normal operations. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- — Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine (reciprocating)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2024_CEN24LA245.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Just Culture in Aviation: A Metaphorical Study on Aircraft Maintenance Students
Just Culture, a sub-dimension of safety culture, has been a prominent and debated topic in aviation safety in recent years.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Performance PRISM: A Comprehensive Framework For Performance Measurement In Aircraft Maintenance
Aircraft maintenance is governed by rigorous safety requirements and high operational complexity, demanding robust performance measurement frameworks to ensure optimal maintenance practices.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗