NTSB CAROL · Event
Event CHI02LA205
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The failure by the flight crew to abort the takeoff, as well as a failure by the flight instructor to properly monitor takeoff performance. Contributing factors to the accident were the flight crew's failure to calculate required takeoff distance, considering existing density altitude and runway surface/condition, and to utilize all available runway length.
Factual narrative
On July 19, 2002, at 1445 central daylight time, a Piper PA28-140, N8220N, piloted by a private pilot, was substantially damaged when it impacted a tree line approximately 120 yards from the end of the runway on takeoff. The airplane was departing runway 18 (2,430 feet x 25 feet, turf) from the El Dorado Springs Memorial Airport (87K), El Dorado Springs, Missouri. The flight had originated from the Bolivar Municipal Airport (M17), Bolivar, Missouri, approximately 20 minutes prior to the accident, with the intention of practicing takeoffs and landings on the turf runway at 87K. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The flight was being conducted under 14 CFR Part 91 and was not on a flight plan. The pilot sustained minor injuries and the certified flight instructor (CFI) on-board sustained serious injuries in the accident. In a written statement, the pilot noted "(my flight instructor) had scheduled me in between 1:30 pm and 3:30 pm to do some actual soft field work as I had never taken off or landed on turf." They had landed on runway 18 at El Dorado Springs and back-taxied to the intersection with runway 4-22. Approximately 1,830 feet was available from the intersection. The aircraft was configured with 2 notches (25 deg) of flaps in accordance with the Pilot's Operating Handbook (POH). Full power was applied prior to brake release, with full "up" elevator. At approximately the halfway point, the pilot thought that the aircraft was not accelerating as required and began to initiate an abort. The flight instructor stated "We should be fine." At which point the pilot returned to full power and continued the roll. "I continued to check the airspeed indicator and it was coming up but slowly. I believe when we reached the point of no return is when [the flight instructor on-board] grabbed the control yoke and pull[ed] full back. I do remember seeing the end of the runway go under us, but don't remember the aircraft sinking as we went off." The airplane impacted the tree line appoximately 120 yards from the end of the runway. Additionally, the pilot noted that "We did not know what the OAT [outside air temperature] was, we did not do a density altitude calculation." The flight instructor, in his written statement, noted "[The pilot] had asked me if I would like to go with him to land and takeoff on a turf runway at El Dorado Springs. The takeoff roll seemed normal and at rotation I believe we had a partial power loss or anyway a reduction of power of some kind. I believe that we contacted the ground and, at that point, I knew we were not going to clear the trees." Weather conditions at the scene were reported by the pilot as 3,000 feet scattered, 10 miles visibility, southwest winds and light turbulence. He did not report wind speed or altimeter setting. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector on-scene reported a field temperature of 98.7F (37C). Weather conditions at the Springfield-Branson Regional Airport (SGF), located 47nm to the southeast, at 1454 cdt, were reported as wind variable at 4 knots, 10 miles visibility and few clouds at 4,000 feet. Temperature and altimeter setting were reported at 32C and 30.00in Hg, respectively. Applying these conditions at El Dorado Springs resulted in a calculated density altitude of 3,085 feet. Consulting the Pilot's Operating Handbook, the takeoff distances required at 3,000 feet standard altitude and 1,950 lbs. gross weight are 900 feet ground run and 1,950 feet over a 50 ft. obstacle. The chart does not specify a runway surface or condition. Later model PA28-140 operating handbooks denote takeoff data as being applicable to a paved, level, dry runway. No further guidance is offered regarding other runway surfaces or conditions. The Pilot's Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge, AC61-23C, Chapter IV -- Airplane Performance, notes that "Air density is perhaps the single most important factor affecting airplane performance. It has a direct bearing on the power output of the engine, efficiency of the propeller, and the lift generated by the wings... . An increase in air temperature or humidity, or decrease in air pressure resulting in a higher density altitude, significantly decreases power output and propeller efficiency." Concerning runway surface condition, the handbook states "The takeoff distance is affected by the surface condition of the runway. If the runway is muddy, wet, soft, rough, or covered with tall grass, these conditions will act as a retarding force and increase the takeoff distance." FAA accident prevention publication Flight Sense, FAA-P-8740-1, suggests that runway lengths be increased at least 10% for short grass. In addition, it recommends adding a safety factor of at least 25% over and above increments applied for density altitude and runway conditions. The pilot held a private pilot certificate with airplane single engine land and instrument airplane ratings. He accumulated 238 hours total time, with 157 hours in the same make and model as the accident aircraft, and 40 hours flown within the past 90 days. He completed a flight review on June 6, 2002. The flight instructor on-board held a commercial pilot certificate with airplane single-engine and multi-engine land and instrument airplane ratings. His flight instructor certificate had airplane single engine and instrument airplane ratings, and is valid through August 2002. He reported approximately 2,700 hours total time, with 100 hours flown within the preceeding 90 days. The 1969 Piper Cherokee 140 (PA28-140) involved in the accident, S/N 28-25424, had accumulated 7,832 hours total time and 105 hours since last inspection. This was an annual inspection which was completed on August 14, 2001. The Lycoming O-320 engine installed, S/N L19466-27A, had accumulated 964 hours since overhaul and 105 hours since last inspection. The pilot did not report any malfunctions associated with the engine or airframe prior to, or at the time of, the accident. The airplane impacted trees about 120 yards past the end of the runway on takeoff. Using the closest weather reporting station, the density altitude was calculated to be 3,085 feet. The pilot stated that neither he nor the certified flight instructor (CFI) on-board calculated the density altitude prior to the takeoff attempt. The takeoff was initiated from the runway intersection. The full runway length was not used. The pilot stated that during the takeoff roll, he reduced engine power to abort the takeoff. He further stated that the CFI advised him that the takeoff could be continued. The pilot restored full power and continued the takeoff. The airplane subsequently impacted the tree line. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2002_CHI02LA205.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, stall, turbulence). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Faculty research project
Understanding the Coupled Interactions Between Hair-Like Micromechanoreceptors and Wall Turbulence
This research focuses on understanding the interactions between turbulent flows and long (high aspect ratio), flexible hair-like microstructures or micropillars inspired by those encountered in nature…
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Comparative Study on the Prediction of Aerodynamic Characteristics of Mini - Unmanned Aerial Vehicle with Turbulence Models
When dealing with CFD simulations the turbulent nature is seen on most of the engineering flows and these flows need to be solved.
- arXiv 2020 · arXiv preprint
Numerical Simulation of Iced Wing Using Separating Shear Layer Fixed Turbulence Models
Aerodynamic prediction of glaze ice accretion on airfoils and wing is studied using the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes method.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Contractor Report (CR)
An Evaluation of an Analytical Simulation of an Airplane with Tailplane Icing by Comparison to Flight Data
This report presents the assessment of an analytical tool developed as part of the NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program. The analytical tool is a specialized simulation program called TAILSM4 which was de…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗