NTSB CAROL · Event
Event DCA24LA328
Registry · N442CV
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
CIRRUS DESIGN SF50
Year of manufacture
2023 · 1 years old at event
Engine
WILLIAMS FJ33-5A
Seats / Engines
7 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
20230322
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A55251
Registrant of record
PP100 LLC
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Factual narrative
On September 14, 2024, at 1248 central daylight time, a Cirrus SF50, N442CV, experienced an uncommanded activation of its emergency automatic landing system soon after the airplane was struck by an unknown object during approach into Austin Bergstrom International Airport (AUS), Austin, Texas. The airplane sustained minor damage due to the impact and the pilot was not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight from Cincinnati Municipal Airport/Lunken Field (LUK), Cincinnati, Ohio to AUS. Object Strike According to the pilot, during approach into AUS, he thought a bird struck the right windscreen and damaged the interior sun visor near the top. However, a photograph provided by the airplane manufacturer, Cirrus Aircraft, showed scraping and blue, red, and white color transfer marks that extended diagonally from the bottom of the right windscreen near the center post toward the top and outboard side the windscreen, see figure 1. The pilot reported that after landing, he wiped the airplane down and noted there was an “oily residue” on the windscreen. He did not retain any samples of the residue. Figure 1. - Scrape and color transfer on windscreen (Source: Cirrus Aircraft). Emergency Autoland The pilot stated that the impact resulted in the activation of the airplane’s Emergency Autoland (EA) sequence. Preliminary information recovered from the airplane’s central maintenance computer indicated that at 1248, while about 1,540 ft above ground level and at a speed of 167 knots, the “Emergency Autoland Activating” warning message was presented in the cockpit for 10 seconds, followed by activation of the EA, which lasted for about 10 seconds before it was deactivated. About 4-5 seconds later, the “Emergency Autoland Activating” warning message was again presented for 10 seconds, before the EA activated for the 2nd time. EA was deactivated 9 seconds later and remained deactivated. After which the pilot was able to land the airplane uneventfully at AUS. The Emergency Autoland system is designed to land the airplane automatically in the event the pilot becomes incapacitated. The system can be activated: 1) by pressing a pushbutton located in the center of the overhead console (about 2 ft aft of the top of the windscreen – see figure 2), 2) if the Automatic Level mode is engaged for 1 minute, or, 3) if the Emergency Descent Mode is active and the airplane descends through 15,000 ft. Figure 2 . – Yellow arrow shows location of Autoland pushbutton (Source: Cirrus Aircraft). Once activated, the system enters a 10 second waiting period and provides visual and aural warnings of the impending EA sequence. The system can be deactivated at any time (during the waiting period or after) with the red autopilot disconnect button, located on the pilot side stick. After the waiting period, it will provide information on the instrument displays, tune the communication radios and broadcast automated messages, set the transponder to 7700, select a destination airport and generate a route to that airport. On approach, it will deploy the flaps, extend the landing gear and follow GPS guidance to the runway. After touchdown it will de-rotate the airplane and apply the wheel brakes. Data files were downloaded from the airplane’s on-board Recoverable Data Module by the airframe manufacturer and forwarded to the NTSB for examination. National Transportation Safety Board systems and recorder specialists were assigned to assist in the investigation of the incident. Parties to the investigation are the Federal Aviation Administration and Cirrus Aircraft. The investigation is continuing. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2024_DCA24LA328.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance, autopilot). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint
ROSflight 2.0: Lean ROS 2-Based Autopilot for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
ROSflight is a lean, open-source autopilot ecosystem for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Designed by researchers for researchers, it is built to lower the barrier to entry to UAV research and acceler…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint
ROSplane 2.0: A Fixed-Wing Autopilot for Research
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) research requires the integration of cutting-edge technology into existing autopilot frameworks.
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- NASA NTRS 2024 · Technical Memorandum (TM)
Testing of Advanced Capabilities to Enable In-time Safety Management and Assurance for Future Flight Operations
In order to refine an initial Concept of Operations, explore Concepts of Use, and expose/validate requirements for future In-Time Aviation Safety Management Systems (IASMS), testing architectures were…
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint
A Data-Driven Autopilot for Fixed-Wing Aircraft Based on Model Predictive Control
Autopilots for fixed-wing aircraft are typically designed based on linearized aerodynamic models consisting of stability and control derivatives obtained from wind-tunnel testing.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗