NTSB CAROL · Event
Event ENG17IA036
Registry · N686DA
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
BOEING 757-232
Year of manufacture
1995 · 22 years old at event
Engine
P & W PW2037
Seats / Engines
178 seats · 2 engines
Last airworthiness date
19950920
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A919CD
Registrant of record
DELTA AIR LINES INC
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A No. 1 (left) engine undercowl fire caused by a fuel nozzle installation error during engine overhaul at Delta TechOps. A fuel nozzle b-nut was cross threaded, which allowed fuel to leak on hot engine case surfaces and subsequently ignite.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHT
On September 6, 2017, at about 0019 PDT, a Delta Air Lines Boeing 757-232, registration N686DA, equipped with two Pratt & Whitney PW2037 turbofan engines, experienced a No. 1 (left) engine undercowl fire during takeoff from McCarran International Airport (LAS), Las Vegas, Nevada. The flight crew reported a left engine fire indication and associated aural fire alert at rotation/initial climb. The crew completed the quick reference handbook (QRH) procedures, declared an emergency, shut down the left engine and discharged one of the fire bottles; the fire warning momentarily was cleared. They then initiated engine out procedures to return to LAS airport. During the downwind leg of the airplane's flight pattern, the fire warning indication re-illuminated, and the second fire bottle was discharged, which cleared the fire warning a second time. The airplane made an uneventful overweight landing at LAS and was met by aircraft rescue and firefighting (ARFF) on the runway. ARFF sprayed fire retardant into the engine and confirmed the fire was extinguished. The airplane was cleared to taxi to the gate under its own power. There were no passengers or crew injuries reported. The flight was being operated in accordance with 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 121 and was a regularly scheduled flight from LAS to John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK), Queens, New York.
DAMAGE TO THE AIRPLANE
There was no damage to the airplane structure. The left engine thrust reverser exhibited thermal damage and discoloration on all interior surfaces except for a localized area between the 1 and 3 o'clock positions where the insulation appeared wet and shiny. The core cowls were thermally damaged, deformed and missing material.
TEST AND RESEARCH
Engine Examination and Disassembly The No. 1 engine was removed from the airplane by Delta Air Lines (DAL) maintenance personnel at LAS and shipped to Delta TechOps- Atlanta, Georgia for examination and disassembly. Party members from DAL, Pratt & Whitney (P&W), Boeing, the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), the Federal Aviation Administration, and the National Transportation Safety Board met at Delta TechOps from September 26-28, 2017. The compressor fan blades were all present and complete. Three fan blades located at the 6 o'clock position exhibited midspan shroud shingling and the fan blade tips were dug into the fan case rub strip and displaced about one inch in the aft direction. The fan could not be rotated by hand until the three shingled fan blades were forced back into their normal position with a pry bar. After the fan blades were adjusted, the fan could be spun smoothly by hand with concurrent rotation of the low pressure turbine. All exterior engine surfaces aft of the fan exit case were sooted. The engine had thermal damage and dark discoloration most concentrated over the high pressure compressor (HPC) and diffuser cases on the lower half of the engine (3 to 9 o'clock positions). Fuel components including the stator vane actuator (SVA), fuel flow transmitter (FFT), and associated fuel lines were thermally damaged with melted and missing material. The thermal damage to these components resulted in fuel system leak points. A SVA hose and tube assembly was found separated and hanging freely from the engine. A leak check of the fuel manifolds and fuel nozzle assemblies was performed by porting shop air into the fuel flow divider valve in accordance with engine maintenance manual procedures. When pressurized air was applied, an air leak was detected at fuel nozzle #7, located at the 3 o'clock position. The nozzle was removed from the engine as an assembly by cutting the fuel manifold supply line, so the fuel nozzle b-nut remained torqued. Preliminary x-rays of the nozzle were taken at Delta TechOps. The x-rays indicated the fuel nozzle b-nut was not properly installed. The fuel nozzle assembly SVA hose and tube assembly that was found separated were packaged and shipped to the P&W Materials and Processes Engineering Lab in East Hartford, Connecticut for additional analysis. Materials Analysis Fuel nozzle #7 was x-rayed at the P&W Quality and Standard Laboratory in East Hartford, Connecticut. The x-ray images confirmed that the b-nut was tilted relative to the nozzle platform and the end of the b-nut was not centered with the nozzle fuel supply tube (cross threaded). There was one or fewer threads engaged between the nozzle and b-nut. The fuel nozzle assembly was sectioned. The o-ring on the fuel nozzle side was present and intact. The second o-ring located on the fuel manifold supply line side was damaged and o-ring fragments were recovered outside of the o-ring gland, near the conical washer seal. The SVA hose and tube assembly was examined to verify there were no anomalies in the SVA flexible hose to rigid tube connection joint. The SVA flexible hose section exhibited thermal damage including a missing fire sleeve and hose liner. The hose liner was separated at one end of the connection to the rigid tube, but other joint connection remained intact. Metallographic sections were taken of both the intact joint and the separated joint and there were no significant differences observed.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Corrective Action Following the event, DAL voluntarily inspected all PW2000 engines in the Delta TechOps repair shop, test cell, and spares pool for proper fuel nozzle installation, with no additional installation error findings. They also reviewed shop records and identified two in service engines that were overhauled/repaired at approximately the same time as the incident engine. The fuel nozzles on these engines were inspected with no findings. In an effort to avoid future installation errors, the diffuser and combustor assembly work instruction card was updated to add an inspector sign off requirement during the pneumatic leak check step of the fuel system assembly. The No. 1 engine fire was caused by an improperly installed #7 fuel nozzle located at the 3 o'clock position of the engine. The nozzle installation error resulted in a fuel leak that subsequently ignited on hot engine case surfaces. All the fuel nozzles had been replaced as part of engine overhaul at the Delta Tech Ops facility 53.7 flight hours/18 cycles prior to the incident flight. The cross threaded condition was evident during visual examination, and an x-ray of the fuel nozzle assembly confirmed the fuel nozzle b-nut was not properly seated, with one or fewer threads engaged. The nozzle assembly featured two o-rings and a conical seal washer (Voi-Shan) that acted in conjunction with the torque applied to the fuel nozzle b-nut to provide a seal. The o-rings and seal washer temporarily compensated for the cross threaded condition, until one of the o-rings began to break apart. The cross threaded b-nut should have been visually detected by the mechanic and inspector. Although, if not visually detected, the cross threaded b-nut may have given a proper torque indication during the required torque check and passed the pneumatic leak check step of the installation procedures. Several fuel system components including the fuel flow transmitter and stator vane actuator are located near the #7 fuel nozzle. The fire thermally damaged the case housings of both of these components resulting in secondary fuel leaks. The damage to the nacelle components including the fan cowl, thrust reverser, and core cowls was due to fire exposure. The area of thermal insulation on the right thrust reverser half that was minimally discolored with a wet and shiny appearance was located radially outboard of the #7 fuel nozzle. The fuel spray from the nozzle provided localized cooling where the fuel contacted the insulation and was too rich to ignite, preserving the fire insulation. The fan blade shroud shingling and displacement noted on three fan blades was most likely a result of firefighting efforts. After the blades were dislodged from the rub strip, the fan spun smoothly. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine fuel and control-Fuel injector nozzle-Incorrect service/maintenance - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2017_ENG17IA036.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗