NTSB CAROL · Event
Event ERA10LA193
Registry · N1572L
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
BEECH 95-B55 (T42A)
Year of manufacture
1976 · 34 years old at event
Seats / Engines
6 seats · 2 engines
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A0E6D9
Registrant of record
DAVIDS BURGERS PARK PLAZA CORP
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's inadvertent retraction of the landing gear during the landing rollout.
Factual narrative
On March 21, 2010, about 1435 eastern daylight time, a Beech 95-B55, N1572L, was substantially damaged during landing at the Flying W Airport (N14), Lumberton, New Jersey. The certificated airline transport pilot was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the personal flight, which was conducted under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. In a written statement to a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector, the pilot stated that he departed from the Red Lion Airport (N73), Vincetown, New Jersey for N14 to practice landings and to get fuel. The pilot stated that the first landing, a touch and go, was "normal." On the second approach to landing, the pilot conducted a go-around for traffic. On the third approach for landing, the pilot stated that the emergency exit window opened, and the pilot conducted a full-stop landing in order to close the window. On the downwind leg of the traffic pattern for the next landing, the cabin door "popped open." The pilot stated that there was "excessive buffet" and "right yaw," and flew the approach at a faster than normal airspeed. The pilot stated that the landing and landing rollout were normal, and about 1,500 feet after the touchdown point, the airplane's nose landing gear "collapsed", followed by the left main landing gear, and then the right main landing gear. After the accident, several individuals assisted in recovering the airplane from the runway. In a written statement to the FAA, one volunteer stated that after several unsuccessful attempts, the airplane was partially raised. He entered the airplane and lowered the landing gear manually. The gear deployed, locked in position, and the airplane was towed off the runway. On March 24, 2010, the airplane was examined by an FAA inspector, who placed the airplane on jacks, deployed the landing gear, and observed the gear to lock completely in both the stowed and down and locked positions. The landing gear doors opened and closed completely and in the proper sequence. According to the FAA inspector, "no discrepancies were noted." In a postaccident interview, the pilot stated to the FAA inspector that it was his habit to retract the wing flaps during the landing rollout. During examination of the airplane, the FAA inspector observed the wing flaps in an "intermediate" position. The flap selector was observed in the "UP" position. The pilot held an airline transport pilot certificate with ratings for airplane single and multi-engine land, a commercial pilot certificate with helicopter rating, and flight instructor certificate with ratings for airplane single and multi-engine, and instrument airplane. His most recent third-class FAA medical certificate was issued in July, 2009. The pilot reported 25,000 hours of flight time, with 300 in the accident airplane. The pilot reported to the FAA inspector that he had flown the accident airplane approximately 6 hours in the 90 days previous to the accident. His most recent flight review was conducted on March 27, 2009, in the accident airplane. The nearest weather reporting station, located approximately 23 nautical miles west of the accident location, reported 10 statute miles visibility, few clouds at 9,500 feet, and winds from 220 at 7 knots gusting to 15 knots. The pilot was conducting his fourth landing when the cabin door came open on the downwind leg of the traffic pattern. The pilot stated that he flew the approach at a faster-than-normal airspeed, and that the landing and landing rollout were normal. About 1,500 feet after touchdown, the airplane's nose landing gear collapsed, followed by the left main landing gear, then the right main landing gear. Following the accident, the landing gear was manually extended and locked in position, and the airplane was towed off the runway. During postaccident examination by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector, the airplane was placed on jacks and the landing gear was extended and retracted several times, with no discrepancies noted. The pilot stated to the FAA inspector that it was his habit to retract the wing flaps during the landing rollout. The wing flaps were observed in an intermediate position, and the flap selector was observed in the "UP" position. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Action-Incorrect action performance-Pilot - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Landing gear selector-Incorrect use/operation - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2010_ERA10LA193.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper
A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research)
Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace)
Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗