ERA13IA396
2013-08-31 · Chesapeake, Virginia, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport PVG
Current FAA registration · N2091W
- Make / Model
- PIPER PA-28RT-201
- Engine
- LYCOMING I0360 SER (180 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19790221
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A1B602
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
Maintenance personnel’s inadequate inspection and compliance with a Federal Aviation Administration airworthiness directive, which resulted in an undetected corroded and cracked stabilator turnbuckle and the subsequent failure of the turnbuckle and loss of elevator control during takeoff.
Factual narrative
On August 31, 2013, about 1345 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-28RT-201, N2091W, experienced a pitch control failure during takeoff at Hampton Roads Executive Airport (PVG), Chesapeake, Virginia. The airplane was undamaged and the two pilots were uninjured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the local flight, which was operated under the provisions of Title14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. According to the pilots, the purpose of the flight was to familiarize themselves with the airplane. During takeoff, as they increased the angle of attack to become airborne, they heard a loud "pop" and lost pitch control. The airplane became airborne momentarily and then touched down on the runway in a three point attitude. Neither of the pilots was injured, and the airplane was undamaged. Examination of the airplane revealed that the aft lower stabilator flight control cable's turnbuckle assembly had broken at the aft cable terminal fitting. Examination of the turnbuckle and aft cable terminal fitting by the NTSB Materials Laboratory revealed that the cable terminal had fractured in the shank region about 0.25 inches from the wrench flats. Areas of the turnbuckle were covered with a white crystalline material, and the shank adjacent to the fracture exhibited reddish orange deposits. Examination of the fractured region with a 5X to 50X binocular zoom stereomicroscope also revealed that the fracture surface was rough with crack branching, which was consistent with stress corrosion cracking. Cleaning of the terminal in the area of the wrench flats and adjacent shank areas using acetone and a scouring pad comparable to a Scotch-Brite general purpose green scouring pad also revealed that some of the reddish orange deposits remained in some of the crevices on and adjacent to the wrench flats. Isolated areas of small pits were also observed on the turnbuckle shanks with a higher density of pits being observed on the outer diameter at the wrench flats. Additionally, a longitudinal crack was discovered at the end of the terminal adjacent to the cable. The area around the crack was also cleaned using acetone and a paper towel, and reddish orange deposits remained adhered to the surface after cleaning. Review of Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) records revealed that the turnbuckle assembly was the subject of FAA Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2013-02-13, which was prompted by reports of cable assembly failures that led to failure of the horizontal stabilator control system and resulted in loss of pitch control. This AD required inspection of the stabilator control system and replacement of parts as necessary. According to FAA and airplane maintenance records, the airplane was manufactured in 1979. The airplane had recently been purchased and was going to be placed in a local operator's fleet for rental and use in their pilot training program. As part of the purchase it had undergone an annual inspection on July 21, 2013. At the time of the inspection, the airplane had accrued 6,100.3 total hours of operation. At the time of the incident the airplane had 6,106 total flight hours. According to the airframe and powerplant mechanic's logbook entry for the annual inspection, Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2013-02-13 (effective March 11, 2013) had been complied with during the annual inspection by inspecting the cables in accordance with Piper Service Bulletin (SB) 1245A. The inspection as described in SB 1245A required that the mechanic disassemble the turnbuckle assembly and clean it using a solvent such as acetone. Use of a Scotch-Brite general purpose green scouring pad was also permitted for cleaning. A 10x magnifier, a mirror, and a suitable light source were then required to be used to inspect the turnbuckle, terminal, and adjacent segment of cable. Any evidence of cracks, cable fraying, or corrosion that remained after the cleaning was cause for replacement. The pilot and safety pilot reported that, during takeoff, they heard a loud "pop" as the pilot increased the angle-of-attack to become airborne and that the airplane then pitched down. The airplane became airborne momentarily and then the safety pilot aborted the takeoff. The airplane touched down on the runway in a three-point attitude. Examination of the airplane revealed that the aft lower stabilator flight control cable's turnbuckle assembly had broken at the aft cable terminal fitting and that the control cable terminal had fractured due to stress-corrosion cracking. Federal Aviation Administration Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2013-02-13 and Piper Service Bulletin (SB) 1245A were issued to address the failure of the control cables. According to the airframe and powerplant mechanic's logbook entry for the most recent annual inspection, which occurred 6 flight hours before the cable failure, he had complied with AD 2013-02-13 by inspecting the cables in accordance with Piper SB 1245A. The SB instructed the mechanic to disassemble the turnbuckle assembly and clean it using a solvent, such as acetone, or a general purpose scouring pad and then to use a 10x magnifier, a mirror, and a suitable light source to inspect each turnbuckle, cable terminal, and adjacent portion of the cable. Any evidence of cracks, cable fraying, or corrosion was cause for replacement. Further examination of the terminal fitting indicated that it was covered in many areas with deposits that were likely a mix of corrosion products, grease, and dirt, and, therefore, that it had not been cleaned sufficiently to allow for an effective inspection. No scratches were observed on the surface, indicating that a scouring pad had not been used. The deposits observed on the turnbuckle were unable to be readily removed without a scouring pad, indicating that they were likely there longer than the month since the inspection occurred. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Flight control system-Stabilizer control system-Fatigue/wear/corrosion - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Flight control system-Stabilizer control system-Failure - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft handling/service-Maintenance/inspections-Scheduled maint checks-Not serviced/maintained - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft handling/service-Maintenance/inspections-Scheduled maint checks-Inadequate inspection - C
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Maintenance-Scheduled/routine maintenance-Maintenance personnel - C
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Inspection-(general)-Maintenance personnel - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2013_ERA13IA396.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.