NTSB CAROL · Event
Event ERA19TA276
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A total loss of engine power due to an obstructed fuel vent, and the flight instructor's failure to ensure that the student did an adequate preflight inspection, which resulted in a forced landing.
Factual narrative
On September 10, 2019, about 1220 central daylight time, a Beech A-23, N3555R, was substantially damaged during a forced landing at Northwest Florida Beaches International Airport (ECP) Panama City, Florida. The student pilot/owner and flight instructor were not injured. The airplane was registered to and operated by the student pilot under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations as a part 91 instructional flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the flight that departed South Alabama Regional Airport at Bill Benton Field (79J) Andalusia, Alabama about 1130. The student pilot and his flight instructor had just completed a cross country flight from ECP to 79J, then back to ECP and were conducting airport traffic pattern work, go-arounds and touch and go landings to runway 16. After a normal go-around due to excessive crosswinds, they initiated a no-flap landing for the next attempt. As the student pilot became established on short final, he reported that the approach was normal, but when he attempted to arrest his descent by increasing engine power, the engine did not respond. The student pulled and pushed the throttle several times and the instructor told him to immediately "push it back in to add power." The instructor's first thought was that the throttle cable had broken. After several unsuccessful attempts to regain engine power, the instructor took control of the airplane and attempted a landing, but touched down short of the runway; the airplane bounced hard, struck the approach lights, then settled back onto the runway before rolling to a stop. According to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) airmen records, the flight instructor held a commercial pilot certificate with ratings for airplane single engine land, multiengine land, instrument airplane. She also held a flight instructor certificate with ratings for airplane single engine land instrument airplane. She reported 3,150 hours total time and was issued an FAA second-class medical certificate in May 1, 2019. The student pilot/owner reported 36.1 hours total time with 6.1 hours in the accident airplane make and model and was issued an FAA third-class medical certificate on August 30, 2017. According to FAA airworthiness and maintenance records, the airplane was issued a standard airworthiness certificate on April 12, 1965. It was a four-place, internally braced low-wing airplane, that was equipped with fixed tricycle landing gear, and a Continental IO-346A, 165-horsepower engine driving a two-blade metal fixed pitch propeller. The airframe and engine had accumulated 3,023 hours total time; the engine accumulated 669 hours total time since overhaul as of the last annual inspection on April 2, 2019. The student pilot purchased the airplane on May 10, 2017. The weather conditions reported at ECP at 1153 included winds 080° at 7 knots, visibility 10 statute miles, scattered clouds at 4,500 ft, temperature 34° C, dew point 22° C, and an altimeter setting of 30.18 inches of mercury. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed that the right wing spar was damaged, and the upper and lower areas on the right wing were buckled. The right gear fairing was buckled, and the left wing was wrinkled where the gear assembly was attached and resulted in damage to the left wing spar. Examination of the airplane's fuel venting system by a mechanic revealed foreign object debris with the consistency of dirt obstructing the right trailing edge fuel vent line. Upon closer examination, it was revealed that the fuel tank vent tube was clogged with mud from an insect, commonly referred to as a "Mud Dauber" wasp. According to the manufacturer's Airplane Flight Manual (AFM), under Section IV Normal procedures, the preflight inspection includes a specific line item to ensure that the right wing trailing edge, fuel tank vent line, is unobstructed. The flight instructor stated that she did not witness the student pilot conduct the preflight inspection of his airplane. After returning from a roundtrip, cross-country flight, the student pilot and flight instructor were conducting airport pattern work, go-arounds, and touch-and-go landings. After a normal go-around due to excessive crosswinds, they initiated a no-flap landing for the next attempt. As the student pilot established the airplane on short final, he attempted to arrest the airplane’s descent by increasing engine power, but the engine did not respond. The instructor told the student pilot to “push it back in to add power,” and the student pilot pulled and pushed the throttle several times to try to increase engine power. After several unsuccessful attempts to increase engine power, the instructor took control of the airplane and attempted a forced landing. The airplane touched down short of the runway, bounced hard, and struck the landing lights before landing back on the runway. The airplane’s airframe sustained substantial damage. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed an obstructed right trailing edge fuel vent line that likely blocked venting of the fuel tank and resulted a negative pressure within the tank, whichsubsequently starved the engine of fuel and resulted a total loss of engine power. The airplane's flight manual specified that during a preflight inspection, the fuel vent line should be checked for any obstructions, but the flight instructor did not witness the student pilot conduct the preflight inspection of the airplane. It is likely that the student pilot did not detect the blocked vent line during the preflight inspection; had more direct supervision been provided by the flight instructor during the preflight inspection, the blockage would have been discovered. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Inspection-Preflight inspection-Student/instructed pilot - C
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Inspection-Preflight inspection-Instructor/check pilot - C
- C Environmental issues-Physical environment-Object/animal/substance-Debris/dirt/foreign object-Awareness of condition - C
- — Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Fuel system-Fuel distribution-Damaged/degraded
- — Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Fuel system-Fuel distribution-Inadequate inspection
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2019_ERA19TA276.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR)
Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Helicopter Safety Performance Data 2023
Foundation 2023 helicopter safety performance data — global accident rates by mission profile (HEMS, off-shore oil, air-tour, agricultural, news/utility).
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Exploring the atmospheric and weather conditions for hoar frost formation at OR Tambo International Airport: A case study of ground aircraft icing events for the period 2017-2023.
Ground aircraft icing has an adverse effect on the aerodynamic performance of aircrafts as well as the efficient operations of airlines and airports.
- NASA NTRS 2023 · Presentation
NASA Icing Overview 2023
This presentation summarizes NASA icing research for an invited talk to be presented on June 22, 2023, at the SAE International Conference on Icing of Aircraft, Engines, and Structures.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2023 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) — A 2023 Industry Refresh
Foundation 2023 CFIT data refresh — three decades after the original CFIT Task Force eliminated >95% of air-carrier CFIT, the GA + Part 135 communities still account for most CFIT fatalities.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Industry report (AQRR)
Airline Quality Rating 2023
The Airline Quality Rating (AQR) was developed and first announced in early 1991 as an objective method for assessing airline quality on combined multiple performance criteria.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗