NTSB CAROL · Event
Event ERA22LA434
Registry · N745EP
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
CESSNA 414
Year of manufacture
1974 · 48 years old at event
Engine
CONT MOTOR TSIO-520 SER (300 hp)
Seats / Engines
7 seats · 2 engines
Last airworthiness date
19740220
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S AA058F
Registrant of record
SUMNER MICHAEL
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The failure of the nose landing gear to fully extend and lock into position for reasons that could not be determined, which resulted in its collapse during landing.
Factual narrative
On September 26, 2022, about 0900 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 414 airplane, N745EP, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident at Augusta Regional Airport at Bush Field (AGS), Augusta, Georgia. The private pilot and passenger were not injured. The airplane was operated by the pilot as a personal flight conducted under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. The pilot reported that during a visual approach to runway 35, while crossing over the runway numbers, he received a landing gear unsafe warning horn alert. He also observed a flickering nose landing gear (NLG) down light indication. He performed a go-around and, while in the traffic pattern, he cycled the landing gear up and down with the landing gear switch. The NLG light continued to flicker on and off, and the main landing gear lights were steady green, indicating they were down and locked. The pilot reported that the tower controller advised that the landing gear appeared to be down, so he continued in the traffic pattern for landing. Upon touchdown the NLG collapsed, and the airplane skidded to a stop on runway 35. The forward fuselage area sustained substantial damage. An examination of the landing gear system found that the NLG adjusting bell crank and actuator rod were connected. The NLG actuator rod was disconnected from the adjusting bell crank to facilitate recovery of the airplane. The NLG locked into place when moved into position by hand and three green lights were observed in the cockpit. There were no anomalies discovered with any linkages, bell cranks, or actuator arms, that would have resulted in the partial extension of the NLG. The landing gear system could not be otherwise functionally tested due to the airframe damage that prevented normal main and nose landing gear movement. The manual landing gear extension crank in the cockpit was found in an intermediate position, neither fully stowed nor extended. The crank was found to catch on the pilot seat when it was attempted to be stowed; however, the crank was able to be stowed when it was rotated approximately 1/4 turn. According to the Airplane Flight Manual, the landing gear emergency extension procedure stated in part: “Hand Crank – Push Button and Stow.” According to the Cessna 414 service manual, information was provided on troubleshooting the landing gear system when all three landing gear were not observed to be down and locked. Several possible issues were listed with corrective actions. The first item listed was, “manual extension crank improperly stowed” with a corrective action being “stow crank properly.” The pilot reported that after an uneventful cross-country flight, while on short final approach to the runway, he received an unsafe nose landing gear (NLG) indication and performed a go-around. The pilot reported that the main landing gear indicator lights showed that the landing gear were down and locked; however, the NLG indicator light was flickering on and off. The pilot cycled the landing gear with the landing gear switch while in the traffic pattern and received confirmation from the tower controller that the landing gear appeared down. Subsequently, the pilot continued the traffic pattern to landing and, upon touchdown, the NLG collapsed and the airplane skidded to a stop on the runway. The fuselage sustained substantial damage. Examination of the landing gear system found no anomalies that would have prevented normal operation of the nose landing gear. Damage sustained to the airframe prevented the landing gear system from being tested. The manual landing gear extension crank was found in an intermediate position, which likely would have prevented the nose landing gear from fully extending and locking into place. The investigation was not able to determine whether the crank was improperly stowed, or not fully engaged, during flight, or whether the crank was moved after the accident during recovery operations. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- — Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Nose/tail landing gear-Malfunction
- — Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Gear extension and retract sys-Unknown/Not determined
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2022_ERA22LA434.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper
A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research)
Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace)
Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗