FTW99LA032
1998-11-20 · NEW IBERIA, Louisiana, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The mechanic's failure to properly torque the connecting rod's bolt and nut during engine overhaul. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
Factual narrative
On November 20, 1998, at 0830 central standard time, a Piper PA32-300 airplane, N2881U, owned and operated by the pilot, was substantially damaged during a forced landing following a loss of engine power near New Iberia, Louisiana. The non-instrument rated private pilot, who was the sole occupant, received minor injuries. Instrument meteorological conditions prevailed and a flight plan was not filed for the Title 14 CFR Part 91 personal flight. The flight originated from the Acadiana Regional Airport, New Iberia, Louisiana, at 0815, and was destined for New Orleans, Louisiana. During a telephone interview conducted by the NTSB investigator-in-charge (IIC), the pilot stated that he departed with a special VFR clearance and was climbing through 2,500 feet when he heard a "fairly loud explosion." The pilot stated that at first, he thought the engine noise sounded similar to a backfire. He noticed a power loss and turned back toward the Acadiana Regional Airport. A few minutes after the first explosion he heard a second "explosion that shook the airplane and sent a blanket of oil over the windshield." The pilot secured the engine and executed a forced landing to a field. During the landing roll, the aircraft crossed a road, impacted a tree with the left wing and the horizontal stabilizer, slid into a fence and came to a stop upright. An FAA inspector examined the airplane and reported that the right main landing gear, four feet of the left outboard wing, and the tip of the left horizontal stabilizer were separated from the airplane. The six seat, fixed landing gear airplane was powered by a Lycoming IO-540-K165 engine, S/N L-19502-48A. The airframe had accumulated a total of 3,392 hours at the time of the accident. The last annual inspection of the aircraft was completed on June 5, 1998. The last engine overhaul was completed on August 20, 1991. Since the last engine overhaul, the engine had accumulated 1,423.49 hours. Review of the maintenance records by the NTSB IIC did not reveal evidence of any uncorrected maintenance discrepancies. The Lycoming IO-540-K165 engine, S/N L-19502-48A, was inspected at the Textron Lycoming factory in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, under the supervision of an FAA inspector. Upon disassembly of the engine, the number 6 connecting rod was found fractured. After examining the connecting rod fracture surface, the failure was determined by the Lycoming metallurgist to be a "secondary failure resulting from overload." One of the number 6 connecting rod's bolt and nut assembly was then examined by the metallurgist. The nut was cut and split in the threaded area. Examination of the nut revealed that the first two threads, adjacent to the contact surface, were "stripped." Additionally, "no scuff marks were observed" on the copper plating in the undamaged portion of the nut contact surface. The metallurgist at the Lycoming factory determined that the two stripped threads indicated that the nut had backed off during operation of the engine, and that the lack of scuff marks on the contact surface copper plating indicated that the nut was not properly torqued during installation. See the enclosed metallurgist's report for details of the examination. The airplane's engine experienced a catastrophic failure during cruise climb. The airplane impacted a tree and fence during the forced landing near a residential area. The airplane's maintenance records revealed that the engine had been overhauled on August 20, 1991, and had accumulated 1,423.49 hours since then. Examination of the engine revealed that the number 6 connecting rod had failed in 'overload' and was a 'secondary failure.' One of the connecting rod's bolt and nut assemblies was then examined. The nut was cut and split in the threaded area. The first two threads of the nut, adjacent to the contact surface, were found 'stripped.' Additionally, 'no scuff marks were observed' on the copper plating in the undamaged portion of the nut contact surface. It was determined that the two stripped threads were the result of the nut backing off during operation, and the lack of a scuff mark on the nut's contact surface was the result of it being improperly torqued during installation. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1998_FTW99LA032.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.