Skip to content

Atlas / NTSB / GAA19CA447

NTSB CAROL · Event

Event GAA19CA447

2019-07-14 Sparks, Nevada, United States Airport · NV23 None 1 aircraft Status: Completed

Aircraft involved

Probable cause & findings

The pilot’s failure to abort the takeoff in a timely manner, which resulted in glider settling into sage brush.

Factual narrative

The glider pilot reported that, during an aerial tow, about 200 ft into the takeoff roll, the glider weathervaned to the left and ran off the side of the runway about a foot. He was unable to correct because of the low airspeed. He added that the paved runway surface and soft dirt off the side of the runway were extremely bumpy and he was concerned about breaking the landing gear. The tow plane was "effectively dragging [the] tail through the dirt" and by the time the glider had built up enough speed to utilize the rudder, he was about halfway down the 1,270 ft runway. The pilot added that the tow airplane lifted off before the glider. The glider lifted to about 10 to 15 ft above the runway and remained in ground effect. The tow airplane and glider drifted to the right of the runway over sage brush. The glider lost airspeed, settled, impacted the sage brush, and cartwheeled. The pilot added that his GPS flight track displayed a maximum ground speed of 52 knots. The glider's stall speed for his configuration was about 51 knots. The manufacturer published on their website that the stall speed was 32.4 knots. The tow pilot reported that, during the takeoff, he saw in a mirror that the glider was "extremely low, with a nose high attitude" before impacting sage brush. The glider sustained substantial damage to the fuselage and right wing. The pilot reported that there were no preaccident mechanical failures or malfunctions with the glider that would have precluded normal operation. The glider pilot reported that the wind was variable and from 190° at 10 knots, gusting to 20 knots. The tow pilot reported that the wind was variable from 190° to 210° with gusts from 5 to 15 knots. The pilots were departing runway 21. The glider pilot reported that, during an aerotow takeoff, the glider weather vaned off the paved surface of the runway about 200 ft into the takeoff roll. The pilot stated that the glider's tailwheel was too small to roll on the unpaved surface and that the glider's acceleration in the dirt "was not as fast as it needed to be." The tow plane became airborne before the glider, and shortly after the glider became airborne at low airspeed, about 10 to 15 ft above ground level, the glider settled into sage brush and contacted the ground, resulting in substantial damage to the fuselage and right wing. The glider pilot reported that there were no preaccident mechanical failures or malfunctions with the glider that would have precluded normal operation, and that the accident could have been prevented by releasing from the tow plane "before leaving the ground." Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12

NTSB Findings

Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).

  • C Environmental issues-Physical environment-Terrain-Rough terrain-Effect on operation - C
  • C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Action-Lack of action-Pilot - C
  • C Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Wind-Crosswind-Effect on operation - C

Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file NTSB_2019_GAA19CA447.txt. Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb. Full investigation docket on data.ntsb.gov ↗.

Related research

What the literature says.

Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.

Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗