NTSB CAROL · Event
Event IAD97LA096
Registry · N4022P
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
CGS AVIATION HAWK ARROW II
Seats / Engines
2 seats · 1 engine
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A4B6BB
Registrant of record
HARPSTER RICHARD E
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's poor judgement for intentionally shutting down an engine to perform a practice single engine landing, which led to a single engine go-around due to conflicting traffic.
Factual narrative
On July 5, 1997, about 1945 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-23-160, N4022P, was substantially damaged as it collided with power lines during a single engine go around at the Hampton Airport, Hampton, New Hampshire. The certificated commercial pilot/co-owner and passenger received minor injuries. Visual meteorological conditions existed and no flight plan was filed for the personal flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. The pilot planned to shut down his left engine for a practice single engine approach, prior to landing on the 2,100 foot grass runway. After a local flight, the pilot returned to the airport and entered the traffic pattern. The pilot placed the landing gear down and secured the left engine on a left downwind leg. The flaps were pumped down on short final, and as he was about to land, the pilot noticed another airplane taking off in the opposite direction. The pilot stated that he executed a single engine go around and sidestepped to the right of the runway to avoid the other airplane. He manually pumped the flaps up and left the landing gear down. Unable to obtain a positive rate of climb, the pilot stated that he focused on maintaining 95 MPH airspeed. After completion of a left turn to reach a clear area, the pilot noticed the airspeed at 80 MPH. The airplane's left wing and landing gear snagged power lines, pulling the airplane to the ground about 300 feet west of the runway. It came to rest in an upright position and no post crash fire ensued. The pilot did not report any mechanical malfunctions with the airplane. The airplane was certified under Civil Air Regulation (CAR) 3. There were no certification requirements for a single engine climb on multi-engine airplanes that weigh less than 6,000 pounds, and have stall speeds less than 70 miles per hour. According to the FAA publication FLYING LIGHT TWINS SAFELY, FAA-P-8740-19: "...Climb performance depends on an excess of power over that required for level flight. Loss of power from one engine obviously represents a 50% loss of power but, in virtually all light twins, climb performance is reduced by at least 80%...If you do find yourself in a position of not being able to climb, it's much better to pull the power on the good engine and landing straight ahead than try to force a climb and lose control..." The following excerpt was extracted from the Airplane Owners and Pilots Association publication, FLYING LIGHT-TWIN ENGINE AIRPLANES, CO23-109-12/95: "...When it is time to start single-engine activities, do so at a safe altitude (allowing for a recovery from all maneuvers above 3,000 [feet] (AGL) and near a suitable airport...some twins have little or no single-engine climb performance, which means no go-around capability...Practicing single-engine landings and go-arounds should only be done simulating engine failure by using zero thrust techniques. If you are unable to maintain altitude or climb, the zero-thrust engine can be used immediately..." The pilot shut down the left engine on the downwind leg for a practice single engine approach to the 2,100 foot grass runway. Prior to landing, the pilot noticed an airplane taking off in the opposite direction. The pilot performed a single engine go around and sidestepped to the right of the runway to avoid the other airplane. The flaps were pumped up and the landing gear was left down. Unable to maintain a positive rate of climb, the pilot turned left toward a clear area. Upon completion of the turn, the left wing and landing gear snagged power lines pulling the airplane to the ground about 300 feet west of the runway. The pilot did not report any malfunctions of the airplane. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1997_IAD97LA096.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, stall, engine failure, go-around). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Contractor Report (CR)
An Evaluation of an Analytical Simulation of an Airplane with Tailplane Icing by Comparison to Flight Data
This report presents the assessment of an analytical tool developed as part of the NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program. The analytical tool is a specialized simulation program called TAILSM4 which was de…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Publication (TP)
NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program: Flight Test Report
This report presents results from research flights that explored the characteristics of an ice-contaminated tailplane using various simulated ice shapes attached to the leading edge of the horizontal …
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Other
[Tail Plane Icing]
The Aviation Safety Program initiated by NASA in 1997 has put greater emphasis in safety related research activities. Ice-contaminated-tailplane stall (ICTS) has been identified by the NASA Lewis Icin…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2019 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Airport Policing in Pakistan: Structure, Training, and Issue
Airports are strategically and economically important installations of any country. Airports are the gateway of any country and any incidents at these gateways may harm the very aspects of a country i…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗