Skip to content

Atlas / NTSB / LAX01LA166

NTSB CAROL · Event

Event LAX01LA166

2001-05-06 NAPA, California, United States Airport · APC None 1 aircraft Status: Completed

Registry · N8710P

FAA Aircraft Registry record.

Make / Model

PIPER PA-24-260

Year of manufacture

1965 · 36 years old at event

Engine

LYCOMING TI0-540 SER (310 hp)

Seats / Engines

4 seats · 1 engine

Last airworthiness date

19650203

ADS-B equipped

Yes — Mode-S ABFC73

Registrant of record

NELSON AIRCRAFT SALES LLC

Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).

Aircraft involved

Probable cause & findings

The pilot-in-command's failure to verify the fuel supply before flight, and his improper fuel management, that resulted in fuel starvation and loss of engine power during takeoff climb resulting in a forced landing and collision with ground obstacles.

Factual narrative

On May 6, 2001, at 1204 hours Pacific daylight time, a Piper PA-24-260, N8710P, sustained substantial damage when it collided with a fence during a forced landing at Napa County Airport, Napa, California. The airplane was being operated by Amphibious Adventures, Inc., under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91, and flown by a certified flight instructor, in the right seat, who was providing instruction to a private pilot, in the left seat. The instructional flight originated from San Rafael Airport, San Rafael, California, approximately 1130. Neither the two pilots nor the two rear-seated pilot-rated passengers were injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan had been filed. The flight instructor stated he was providing an airplane checkout to the left seat pilot. The left seat pilot was making a touch-and-go on runway 18R. After landing and taking off, the airplane's engine sputtered, and then quit between 150 and 200 feet above ground level. The flight instructor took control of the airplane and landed straight ahead on the remaining runway. The airplane touched down near the end of the runway, rolled across a field, struck a fence, and stopped in a ditch. The flight instructor stated that during the preflight inspection, all four fuel tanks were sumped to check for fuel quality and no discrepancies were found. All four fuel tanks were checked for quantity. The two auxiliary fuel tanks were full and the two main tanks were half full, as observed by the fuel gauges. The flight instructor further stated that takeoffs and landings are to be made with fuel drawn from the main tanks only. The airplane had been flying for about 35 minutes at the time of the accident. Upon postaccident inspection, the flight instructor noted that the fuel bladder had pulled away from the tank and may have caused the fuel gauge to give an erroneous reading. A Federal Aviation Administration inspector examined the airplane and confirmed fuel and oil were in the engine, with no obvious discrepancies noted. During a forced landing due to a loss of engine power on climb following a touch-and-go, the airplane touched down near the end of the runway, rolled across a field, struck a fence, and stopped in a ditch. The airplane departed 35 minutes earlier with main fuel tanks indicating half full and auxiliary fuel tanks indicating full. The pilot did not verify the indications of the fuel quantity gauges. In the accident type of airplane, takeoffs and landings must be performed with fuel being drawn from the main fuel tanks. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12

Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file NTSB_2001_LAX01LA166.txt. Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb. Full investigation docket on data.ntsb.gov ↗.

Related research

What the literature says.

Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (fuel starvation). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.

Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗