NTSB CAROL · Event
Event LAX03FA254
Registry · N340DC
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
HUGHES 269C
Year of manufacture
1977 · 26 years old at event
TCDS
4H12 · SCHWEIZER RSG LLC
Engine
LYCOMING HIO-360-D1A (190 hp)
Seats / Engines
3 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
20241016
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A3BD9C
Registrant of record
ITB SOKOLOWSKI LLC
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the pilot's in-flight loss of control due to a Somatogravic illusion and/or spatial disorientation. Factors in the accident were the dark lighting conditions and the pilot's lack of familiarity with the airplane.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHT
On August 8, 2003, at 2132 Pacific daylight time, a Cessna 340A, N340DC, collided with terrain after a loss of control in the takeoff initial climb from the Bishop Airport (BIH), Bishop, California. The airplane was operated by the owner under 14 CFR Part 91. The commercial pilot was fatally injured, and the airplane was destroyed by post impact fire. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed. The first leg of the flight originated at Upland, California, about 1915. After deplaning two passengers at BIH and refueling, the airplane was departing on the return leg to Upland when the accident occurred. Witnesses reported watching the airplane accelerate on runway 12, rotate, and climb to about 200 - 300 feet above ground level with a decrease in climb rate; the airplane was then seen to initiate a left turn rolling to what appeared to be a wings vertical attitude. At this point the airplane descended into the terrain. One witness north of the accident site described the landing lights going from horizontal to vertical followed by a decrease in engine sound just before impact. The impact site was east of the airport about 0.68 nautical miles. The departure direction is towards the White Mountain Range with sparse population and few ground reference lights.
PERSONNEL INFORMATION
According to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) records, the pilot started his aviation career as an Aviation Maintenance Technician with the issuance of an airframe and powerplant certificate on January 25, 1990. He then obtained a flight engineer certificate for turbojet engine airplanes on July 5, 1996. Subsequently, he began flight training and received a private pilot certificate on August 28, 1998, with an instrument pilot add-on rating March 5, 1999. The pilot became a commercial pilot on September 1, 2000, with a multiengine add-on rating October 11, 2000. He became a flight instructor on August 16, 2002, with an instrument instructor add-on rating January 27, 2003, and multiengine instructor on May 11, 2003. A review of the pilot's logbook revealed that through August 7, 2003, the pilot logged 1,189 total single engine flight hours and 113 multiengine hours for a total flight time of about 1,302 hours. At the time of the accident the pilot was employed as a flight instructor at F.A.S.T. Aviation, El Monte, California. The only multiengine airplanes flown as the pilot-in-command according to the log, were a Beech 76 and a Piper PA34-200T. The last recorded multiengine flight time was 2.6 flight hours on August 5, 2003. The last recorded logbook entries were August 7, 2003, for three single engine dual instruction flights totaling about 6 hours. On the day of the accident, and prior to the accident flight, the pilot/instructor flew with three students in single engine land airplanes at El Monte. The instructional dual periods are typically scheduled in 2-hour blocks of time. The actual flight time was 2.4 hours with the remaining time as ground instruction. The pilot's work day started about 0800 and ended about 1700. He then drove to the Cable Airport, Upland, to fly the accident airplane to Bishop with the airplane owner and a passenger. The prearranged departure time from Cable was for 1500; however, the pilot did not arrive until about 1800. According to the owner of the accident airplane, the pilot had never flown it prior to the accident flight. The initial leg from Upland to Bishop took about 1.25 hours. Examination of the pilot records failed to locate any Cessna 300 nor 400 series multiengine flight time. In the last 30 days he had given instruction in a smaller light twin engine airplane.
AIRCRAFT INFORMATION
Examination of the maintenance records revealed an annual inspection was accomplished on November 20, 2002, at a total flight time of 1,104.1 flight hours. A pre-purchase inspection was accomplished for the current owner by Foothill Aircraft Sales and Service, Inc., on June 17, 2003, (invoice 6986). The last airframe maintenance (Foothill invoice 6991) documented the replacement of all tires and tubes, brake pads, and a wheel half replacement on the left main wheel at 1,123 hours. No additional maintenance was performed on the engines since the annual. The last documented compliance with the certifying of the altimeters and the static systems (FAR 91.411) in accordance with FAR Part 43 Appendix E, occurred on November 7, 2002. Functional testing of the ATC transponder required by FAR 91.413 was accomplished in accordance with Part 43 Appendix F, on November 7, 2002. No operating times were recovered from the accident airplane instrumentation. The last maintenance time of 1,123 hours, plus the flight time of 1.25 hours to Bishop provided by the owner, totals 1,124.25 total flight hours on the airplane.
METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION
At 2156, Bishop was reporting sky clear 10 statute miles visibility; wind 010 degrees at 06 knots; temperature 75 degrees Fahrenheit; dew point 39 degrees Fahrenheit; and the altimeter was 30.03 inHg. According to a Safety Board sun and moon program, the moon's disk was 89 percent illuminated about the time of the accident. The sunset was at 2000.
WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATION
The Safety Board examined the wreckage on scene. The site is on soft sandy soil. The scattered wreckage is measured about 52 feet in width and about 107 feet in length. All components of the airplane and engines display post accident fire damage. The point of first contact with the soil is associated with a wing tip bell frame and red glass fragments. On a magnetic heading of about 330 degrees at 16 feet from the first ground contact, the left 3-bladed propeller assembly is located buried in the sandy soil with a partial blade exposed and severed from the crankshaft. Beyond that is another crater with the nose baggage door/ice shield; at 34 feet the right propeller assembly is severed from the crankshaft and buried in the sand with a blade exposed. At 55 feet, wing tip tank parts were located in close proximity with green glass fragments. The farthest airplane parts on this heading are right wing tip tank parts at 107 feet. The center of the main wreckage is located about 355 degrees and 104 feet from the first ground contact. The main wreckage consists of both engines, exhaust system and turbo chargers, an outboard section of the right wing and aileron, the right horizontal stabilizer and elevator, remnants of the vertical stabilizer, cabin seat structure, and throttle quadrant assembly. The fuselage center section with system remnants are all severely fire damaged. Both control yoke gust lock holes were found free from obstruction or damage to the hole dimension. Both turbine wheel and compressor wheels displayed rotational damage. A fuel control "Butterfly" door displayed sooting/burn marks in the closed position. The damaged throttle quadrant revealed the propellers and mixtures were in the forward position, and the throttles were aft and next to the takeoff trim "Nose Up" placard. The elevator trim indicator was found in the white arc of the takeoff range. The 3-bladed Q-tip propellers displayed some leading edge damage and chordwise scoring with some mild blade aft bending. The crank shafts were severed just aft of the crank flanges in an overload/bending appearance. Black and blue heat transfers were observed in the fracture smears perpendicular to the shaft surface. The landing gear position was determined mechanically to be in the down position. The flap position was undetermined. The landing lights were extended and the nose taxi light was destroyed. The elevator trim tab actuator (subject to cable pull) was measured 1.65 inches, or 4 degrees tab up. The rudder trim tab was measured at .8 inches. The fuel selectors, (subject to cable pull), were found in the off positions. Limited instrumentation indications were obtained. The copilot directional gyro was indicating 210 degrees.
MEDICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL INFORMATION
The Inyo County Medical Examiner performed an autopsy on the pilot. During the course of the procedure samples were obtained for toxicological examination by the FAA Civil Aeromedical Institute, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. The results of the examination were negative for carbon monoxide, cyanide, ethanol, and drugs.
TESTS AND RESEARCH INFORMATION
Due to the degree of post accident fire damage to the engines and accessories, and the requirement for special tooling to disassemble them, the engines were shipped to the manufacturer. Teledyne Continental Motors, Mobile, Alabama, performed the formal disassembly and examination with FAA oversight. There were no catastrophic mechanical failures found in the engines that would have precluded the engines from functioning. The Continental report is attached to the docket.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
. On August 18, 2004, the wreckage was released to an officer of the corporation owning the airplane. A copy of the self-service refueling system receipt was obtained from the Bishop airport operator. The refueling service was activated at 20:49:47, and 57.91 gallons of 100LL aviation fuel was dispensed. According to FAR Part 61.57 Recent Flight Experience: Pilot in command. (c) General experience: "No person may act as pilot in command of an aircraft carrying passengers, nor of an aircraft certificated for more than one required pilot flight crew member, unless he has made three takeoffs and three landings as the sole manipulator of the flight controls in an aircraft of the same category and class and, if a type rating is required, of the same type." The FAA AC61-23C Pilot's Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge, addresses the environmental factors, which affect pilot performance. In that section they address in-flight visual illusions. The Cessna Aircraft Company publishes a "Pilot Safety and Warning Supplements" booklet to address illusions in flight. In that section it describes Somatogravic Illusion, "a rapid acceleration during takeoff can create the illusion of being in a nose up attitude. The disoriented pilot will push the airplane into a nose low, or dive attitude. A rapid decelleration by a quick reduction of the throttles can have the opposite effect, with the disoriented pilot pulling the airplane into a nose up, or stall attitude." During a nighttime takeoff initial climb, the airplane collided with terrain near the airport. Witnesses reported watching the airplane accelerate on runway 12, rotate, and climb to 200 to 300 feet above ground level. The climb rate decreased and the airplane appeared to initiate a left turn, with the roll continuing to a wings vertical attitude. At this point the airplane descended into the terrain. One witness north of the accident site described the landing lights going from horizontal to vertical followed by a decrease in engine sound just before impact. According to the airplane owner, the pilot had never flown the accident airplane before the first leg to the accident location to drop off the owner and another passenger. Examination of the pilot records failed to locate any previous flight time in Cessna 300 or 400 series airplanes. In the last 30 days he had given instruction in a smaller light twin engine airplane. Post accident examination of the wreckage revealed the landing gear to be in the down position at the time of impact. The retractable landing lights were extended and the nose gear taxi light was destroyed. Both propellers exhibited symmetrical power signatures. No preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures were identified. The impact site was east of the airport about 0.68 nautical miles. The departure direction is towards a mountain range with sparse population and few ground reference lights. The moon's disk was 25 degrees above the southeastern horizon and was 89 percent illuminated. The FAA AC61-23C Pilot's Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge addresses the environmental factors and potential in-flight visual illusions, which could affect pilot performance. The reference material describes Somatogravic Illusion as, "a rapid acceleration during takeoff can create the illusion of being in a nose up attitude. The disoriented pilot will push the airplane into a nose low, or dive attitude. A rapid deceleration by a quick reduction of the throttles can have the opposite effect, with the disoriented pilot pulling the airplane into a nose up, or stall attitude." Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2003_LAX03FA254.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, loss of control, spatial disorientation, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Design, Implementation, and Testing of Spatial Disorientation Scenarios in a Modified Hexapod Motion Simulator
Abstract Investigations into aviation accidents aim to identify root causes and enhance safety. Despite advancements in safety measures, technology, and education, general aviation accident rates rema…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Semantic Scholar 2016 · Article (Interacción)
Trajectory Recovery System: Angle of Attack Guidance for Inflight Loss of Control
This paper describes the design and development of an ecological display to aid pilots in the recovery of an In-Flight Loss of Control event due to a Stall (ILOC-S).
- NTSB Aircraft Accident Reports 2010 · Accident report
Loss of Control on Approach — Colgan Air Flight 3407
Colgan Air 3407 / Continental Connection (Q400) Buffalo NY, February 12, 2009 — 50 fatalities. Definitive investigation of the Colgan 3407 stall-stick-pusher crash on approach to Buffalo.
- NTSB Aircraft Accident Reports 2002 · Accident report
Loss of Control and Impact with Pacific Ocean — Alaska 261
Alaska Airlines Flight 261 (MD-83) Pacific Ocean, January 31, 2000 — 88 fatalities. Definitive investigation of the Alaska 261 pitch-runaway-and-loss-of-control crash.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗