NTSB CAROL · Event
Event MIA00LA263
Registry · N7196L
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
GRUMMAN AMERICAN AA-5
Year of manufacture
1973 · 27 years old at event
Engine
LYCOMING 0-320 SERIES (180 hp)
Seats / Engines
4 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
19740130
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A9A0B1
Registrant of record
DODSON INTERNATIONAL PARTS INC
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the intentional stall/mush by the pilot-in-command due to obstructions ahead resulting in a hard landing. Contributing to the accident was the partial loss of engine power due to fuel starvation caused by wear, fatigue, then overstress separation of the mixture control cable resulting in the mixture control arm moving to the idle cutoff position.
Factual narrative
On September 16, 2000, about 1000 eastern daylight time, a Grumman AA-5, N7196L, registered to Positive Attitudes, Inc., experienced a loss of engine power shortly after takeoff from the Zephyrhills Municipal Airport, Zephyrhills, Florida. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time and no flight plan was filed for the 14 CFR Part 91 personal flight. The airplane was substantially damaged and the private-rated pilot and one passenger were not injured. One passenger sustained minor injuries. The flight originated about 1 minute earlier from the Zephyrhills Municipal Airport. The pilot stated that the aircraft preflight and engine run-up before departure were uneventful. The flight departed and during the initial climb at approximately 350 feet above ground level (agl), he noted that the airplane did not appear to be ascending as expected. He looked at the tachometer which was indicating between 1,900 and 2,000 rpm and, "...checked throttle and mixture which were both OK." He also scanned the gauges and switches on the instrument panel which were also indicating "OK." He advised his passengers of the situation and maneuvered the airplane for a landing in a field. He noted trees that were ahead and applied aft elevator control input to intentionally stall the airplane; it dropped and impacted the ground then slid approximately 60-70 feet before coming to rest upright. Both passengers reported that the airplane impacted the ground "real hard." The accident site was located approximately 1 mile north of the airport. The airplane was recovered and according to the FAA certificated mechanic who recovered it, the carburetor bowl was drained and found to contain 2.5 ounces of fuel; no contaminants were noted. Some automotive fuel was present. The mechanic also indicated that he smelled fuel on the ground during recovery and that there was no fuel remaining in the fuel tanks when he recovered the airplane. Examination of the airplane following recovery by an FAA airworthiness inspector revealed the mixture control cable was broken aft of the mixture control arm at the carburetor. An approximate 3-inch section of the cable remained secured to the mixture control arm which was found in the idle cutoff position. A bracket located in the engine compartment approximately 4.5 inches aft of the carburetor that secures the mixture control cable was noted to be displaced approximately 1.5 inches to the left; the cable housing remained secured to the bracket. The swivel assembly in the mixture control arm was installed upside down contrary to the illustrations in the maintenance manual and the illustrated parts catalog. The damaged propeller was removed from the airplane and a serviceable propeller was installed for the attempted engine run that was performed with FAA oversight. The engine was started and operated to 2,300 rpm. A check of each magneto during the engine run revealed that the left magneto had a broken "P" lead; the right magneto drop was noted to be "OK." Also during the engine run, a "tinny rattling noise" was heard. The engine was secured and a rattling sound was heard when the muffler struck by hand. The muffler was removed and cut open which revealed that both end caps of the flame tube were separated and loose inside the muffler. Copies of the FAA inspector statements are an attachment to this report. The muffler and broken mixture control cable were retained for further examination by the NTSB Materials Laboratory located in Washington, D.C. Metallurgical examination of the mixture control cable revealed the fracture location of the wire was 0.14 inches forward of the end of the housing when the cable was straight and with the knob pushed in all of the way. The solid wire of the cable was worn adjacent to the fracture surface with the greatest wear on the wire located within approximately 0.34 inches aft and 0.09 inches forward of the fracture location. The worn surface was located at the outside radius of the bend (on the right side of the cable). Fatigue was noted emanating from multiple origins at the worn surface of the wire adjacent to the fracture surface. The area of the fatigue region was less than 10 percent of the total fracture surface area. The remaining fracture surface had dimpled fracture features consistent with overstress fracture. The fracture surfaces of the forward and aft pieces of the control cable were fit together which formed an angle of 129 degrees relative to each other with a bend radius of approximately 0.17 inches at the cable centerline. The direction of the deformation in the cable was such that the angle of the bend pointed to aircraft right. Examination of the muffler revealed the interior of the muffler had a generally corroded appearance, and the perforated inner cylinder wall thickness appeared thinner nearest the fracture locations where the end caps were located. Pieces were missing from the inner cylinder. Impact damage to the exterior of the muffler was noted and one of the separated end caps was deformed which was associated with the exterior crushing. Portions of the fracture surfaces on each end cap had a relatively shiny appearance consistent with little or no oxidation. A copy of the metallurgy report is an attachment to this report. The airplane was manufactured in 1974, and had accumulated approximately 2,246 hours since then at the time of the accident. There was no record that the mixture control cable had been replaced since the airplane was manufactured. The muffler was replaced with an "overhauled" unit on August 11, 1993. The muffler had been in service for 408 hours at the time of the accident as determined by the tachometer. The airplane was inspected last on October 26, 1999, in accordance with an annual inspection and had accumulated approximately 44 hours since then at the time of the accident. Excerpts from the maintenance records are an attachment to this report. The airplane minus the retained mixture control cable was released to Mr. Steven M. Homenda, insurance adjuster for Universal Loss Management, Inc., on September 20, 2000. The muffler was retained on November 15, 2000. The retained mixture control cable and muffler were released to Mr. Steven M. Homenda, on July 13, 2001. The pilot noted the airplane was not climbing as expected and a decreased engine rpm. He checked the throttle and mixture controls then with obstructions ahead, intentionally stalled the airplane; a hard landing resulted. The mixture control arm was in the idle cutoff position and the mixture control cable was fractured aft of the mixture control arm. A bracket near the carburetor securing the mixture cable was displaced to the left 1.5 inches. The swivel assembly in the mixture control arm was installed upside down. Post accident, the engine was operated to 2,300 rpm. Both ends of the flame tube of the muffler were found separated following the engine run. One of the flame tube ends was impact damaged; portions of the fracture surfaces on both flame tube ends had a relatively shiny appearance. Wear and fatigue noted on the mixture control cable adjacent to the fracture area; bending overstress to the right on the remaining fracture surface. The mixture control cable had not been replaced since airplane manufacture in 1974. The airplane had accumulated 2,246 hours since then, 44 hours since the last annual inspection 11 months earlier, and 408 hours since an overhauled muffler was installed. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2000_MIA00LA263.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, fuel starvation, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗