NTSB CAROL · Event
Event MIA02LA116
Registry · N5235K
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
RYAN NAVION B
Year of manufacture
1950 · 52 years old at event
Engine
LYCOMING GO-435C&D SER (260 hp)
Seats / Engines
5 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
19551022
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A69724
Registrant of record
MEINEN ALBERT D
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the pilot's inadequate preflight planning, improper fuel consumption calculations, and selection of the auxiliary fuel tank for landing, which resulted in a loss of engine power due to fuel starvation, and forced landing in trees. A factor in this accident was the pilot's lack of total experience in type of aircraft.
Factual narrative
On June 21, 2002, about 1620 eastern daylight time, a Navion Nav4, N5235K, registered to and operated by an individual, impacted with trees during a forced landing while on final approach at the Triple W Airport, Raleigh, North Carolina. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time and no flight plan was filed for the 14 CFR Part 91 personal flight. The airplane was substantially damaged. The private-rated pilot reported no injuries. The flight had originated from Bremen, Ohio, at 1346. According to the pilot after completion of a cross-country flight, he began a decent about 30 miles southeast of Greensboro, North Carolina. He said he "…pulled the knob to start fuel transfer from the reserve (auxiliary) tank." He entered the airport pattern at 1,200 feet MSL and "flew one circuit of the pattern to check the wind sock." He turned onto the base leg, and "a few seconds" later turned onto final. After turning onto final he said, "almost immediately the engine lost power...[he] immediately checked the fuel selector," added full throttle to the engine, checked the propeller control, mixture and booster pump to the high boost position. He felt he could not make it to runway 16, and braced for a crash landing. The airplane struck the trees and fell to the ground. The engine remained lodged in the tree. A mechanic (I.A.), who assisted in the engine examination, and specializes in Navion maintenance and restoration, stated in his report, that he felt the engine lost power due to fuel exhaustion as the pilot/owner stated to the I.A. that he had selected the auxiliary tank about two minutes prior to reaching the airport. In addition, the pilot told the mechanic that after the engine lost power the boost pump did not do any good. The pilot said he had flown about 2 hours and 20 minutes from Ohio to Raleigh. According to the mechanic it was his experience with Navions that fuel consumption "...would be close to exhausting the fuel in the main tanks," and that the fuel in the main tanks was "near empty" when the pilot switched to the auxiliary tank. The auxiliary tank is "gravity fed" into the right main tank, and not to the selector valve, which "...upon entering a steep bank turn, all the small amount of fuel went to the low side with no way to the accumulator tank from this position." In addition, the placards in the airplane "are clear that an auxiliary tank is to be used in straight, level flight." The aircraft TCDS (type certificate data sheets) precludes the operation of the auxiliary tank except in "straight and level flight." It is not approved for use for takeoff or landing. (See the Hough Aero Service's Report, an attachment to this report). According to the FAA Inspector's statement, an engine inspection was conducted at Hough Aero Services, Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina, August 6, 2002, on the engine that had been installed on N5235K. External examination of the engine revealed that all engine mount legs were broken upon impact when the fuselage separated from the engine. The overall condition of the engine and propeller precluded a ground engine run, but the integrity of the crankshaft, camshaft, connecting rods, and valve train were confirmed. The exhaust system was damaged from impact. The right magneto was broken from the engine at the flange where it attached to the engine. The examination of the spark plugs, the ignition harness, magnetos, and the engine revealed no discrepancies. (See the FAA inspector's statement, an attachment to this report). According to the pilot he had a total of 484 hours in all aircraft, with a total of 44 hours in this make and model airplane. Of the 44 hours in this make and model 25 flight hours were as pilot-in-command. According to the pilot, after completion of a cross-country flight of about 2 hours and 20 minutes, he began a descent and pulled the knob to start fuel transfer from the reserve (auxiliary) tank. He entered the airport pattern, flew one circuit of the pattern to check the wind sock. He turned onto the base leg, and a few seconds later turned onto final. After turning onto final the engine lost power. He immediately checked the fuel selector, added full throttle to the engine, checked the propeller control, mixture and booster pump to the high boost position. He felt he could not make it to the runway, and braced for a crash landing. The airplane struck trees and fell to the ground. An examination of the engine revealed no discrepancies. Fuel calculations revealed that fuel consumption for the length of this flight would be close to exhausting the fuel in the main tanks, and that the fuel in the main tanks was near empty when the pilot switched to the auxiliary tank. The auxiliary tank was gravity fed into the right main tank, and not to the selector valve. Upon entering a steep bank turn, from base leg to final, all the small amount of fuel went to the low side with no way to the accumulator tank from that position. In addition, the placards in the airplane were clear that an auxiliary tank is to be used in straight, level flight. The aircraft TCDS (type certificate data sheets) precludes the operation of the auxiliary tank except in "straight and level flight." It is not approved for use for take-off or landing. The pilot had a total of 484 hours in all aircraft, with a total of 44 hours in this make and model airplane. Of the 44 hours in this make and model, 25 flight hours were as pilot-in-command. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2002_MIA02LA116.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, fuel exhaustion, fuel starvation, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗