NTSB CAROL · Event
Event MIA06LA037
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The loss of engine power during takeoff-initial climb due to fuel starvation, which resulted in a hard, off-airport forced landing.
Factual narrative
On December 29, 2005, about 1145 eastern standard time, a Cessna P206C, N8640Z, registered to Fayard Enterprises, Inc., operated by Florida Skydiving Center, experienced a total loss of engine power shortly after takeoff from Lake Wales Municipal Airport, Lake Wales, Florida. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time and no flight plan was filed for the 14 CFR Part 91, local, skydiving flight from Lake Wales Municipal Airport. The airplane was substantially damaged and the commercial-rated pilot, and 3 skydivers were not injured. The flight was originating at the time of the occurrence. The pilot stated that on the day of the accident, he started his day between 0800 and 0830, and before the first flight added 30 gallons of fuel to each fuel tank. The flight departed on the 1st load of skydivers with the fuel selector positioned to the right tank. He flew 10 "loads"; each "load" was flown to 4,000 feet. After landing following the 10th load he moved the fuel selector to the left tank position, and flew 2 "loads" also to 4,000 feet. He landed, loaded skydivers for his 13th load, and departed. During climbout at 400 feet from runway 17, the engine quit suddenly; there was no sputtering. He immediately pumped the throttle 2 times, and turned on the auxiliary fuel pump which did not restore engine power. He did not have time to look at the fuel pressure gauge or check the magnetos, and set up for a forced landing in an industrial park near the airport. He maneuvered the airplane for a forced landing, touched down, and rolled approximately 250 feet before coming to rest. Postaccident examination of the airplane by an FAA airworthiness inspector revealed no evidence of fuel leakage. The left fuel tank contained approximately 20 gallons, and the right fuel tank approximately 7 gallons. No fuel contamination was noted. The fuel selector was positioned to the left fuel tank. Examination of the fuel strainer revealed no discrepancies, the screen was clean. Crankshaft, camshaft, and valve train continuity was confirmed. During rotation of the engine, suction and compression was noted at all cylinders, and spark was noted at all spark plugs. The mechanical fuel pump drive coupling was intact, and the pump rotated freely by hand. Examination of the flexible fuel line from the mechanical fuel pump to the throttle body fuel control unit revealed no fuel in the line. The flexible fuel line (return) from the throttle body fuel control unit to the mechanical fuel pump contained fuel. The flexible fuel line from the throttle body fuel control unit to the fuel manifold valve did not contain any fuel. All fuel injector nozzles and lines, the throttle body fuel control unit, fuel manifold valve, mechanical fuel pump, and auxiliary fuel pump were retained for further examination. The fuel injector nozzles and lines, throttle body fuel control unit, fuel manifold valve, and mechanical fuel pump were bench tested at the manufacturer's facility with FAA oversight; all components were bench tested in the as received condition. Prior to bench testing of the throttle body fuel control unit, the inlet screen was examined and found to be clean. Bench testing of the throttle body fuel control unit revealed the measured fuel flow in terms of pounds-per-hour (pph) was greater than specification at all test points. Bench testing of the mechanical fuel pump revealed the measured fuel flow in terms of pph was within limits at all 4 test points, but the observed inlet pressure at all 4 test points was less than specification. Bench testing of the fuel manifold valve, fuel injector lines, and fuel injector nozzles as an assembly revealed fuel flow in terms of pph was within limits at 3 of the 4 test points, and flowed .137 pph greater than specification at the last test point. A comment in the manufacturer's report indicates that the observed fuel flow values for the bench tested components may be a result of field adjustment. The airplane minus the retained components was released to the owner of the airplane (Paul Fayard), on January 31, 2006. All NTSB retained components were also released to the airplane owner on February 10, 2007. The pilot reported that shortly after reaching an altitude of 400 feet agl after takeoff, the engine quit suddenly. He immediately pumped the throttle two times, and turned on the auxiliary fuel pump, but this did not restore engine power. He made a hard forced landing in an industrial park near the airport. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed approximately 20 gallons of fuel in the left main fuel tank and 7 gallons in the right main fuel tank; no fuel contamination was found. Examination of the engine revealed crankshaft, camshaft, and valve train continuity. No discrepancies were noted with the ignition system. Examination of the fuel lines in the engine compartment revealed no fuel in the line from the throttle body fuel control unit to the fuel manifold valve, and no fuel was found in the fuel line from the mechanical fuel pump to the throttle body fuel control unit. The only fuel line that had fuel was the return line from the throttle body fuel control unit to the mechanical fuel pump. Bench testing of the fuel injection components revealed no evidence of failure or malfunction of any of the tested components. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2005_MIA06LA037.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (fuel starvation, fuel contamination). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- AOPA Air Safety Institute 2023 · Safety advisor
Safety Advisor: Fuel Awareness
AOPA Air Safety Institute safety advisor on preventing fuel-exhaustion and fuel-starvation accidents in general aviation. Covers pre-flight fuel planning, reserve requirements (14 CFR 91.151, 91.167),…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Combined Contamination and Space Environmental Effects on Solar Cells and Thermal Control Surfaces
For spacecraft in low Earth orbit (LEO), contamination can occur from thruster fuel, sputter contamination products and from products of silicone degradation.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗