NTSB CAROL · Event
Event NYC00LA246
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's failure to maintain the manufacture's recommended safe single-engine airspeed, which resulted in a velocity-minimum-control roll to the right. A factor in the accident was the pilot's failure to maintain a proper glide path to his intended touchdown point, which resulted in a single engine go-around attempt.
Factual narrative
On September 1, 2000, about 1450 Eastern Daylight Time, a Cessna 310G, N8978Z, was substantially damaged when it struck trees during a single engine go-around at Seven Springs Airport, Seven Springs Borough, Pennsylvania (7SP). The certificated commercial pilot and passenger received minor injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the personal flight that departed Charleston, West, destined for Glens Falls, New York. An instrument flight rules flight plan was filed, and the flight was conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. According to the pilot, he departed Atlanta, Georgia, and flew to Charleston, West Virginia, for fuel. He departed Charleston, and climbed to a cruise altitude of 5,000 feet msl. It was a "clear day," and the flight was uneventful until the passenger told the pilot the right engine spinner looked unusual. To get a better look at the spinner, the pilot reduced the throttle on the right engine, but still could not identify the problem. The pilot then advised air traffic control that he was going to shut down the right engine to examine the spinner. After securing the engine, the pilot could see a tear in the spinner. The pilot restarted the engine, but then shut it down because of a vibration. The pilot advised the controller that he secured the engine, and needed to divert. The controller initially gave the pilot radar vectors to the Sumerset County Airport, Sumerset, Pennsylvania, but then advised him it was closed. The controller then provided vectors to Seven Springs. The pilot executed a straight in visual approach to Runway 28. While on short final, the pilot realized he would not make his intended touchdown point, because the airplane was too high. With the airplane "sinking excessively," the pilot decided to go around. He advanced the throttle on the left engine; the airplane rolled right; and the right wing contacted several trees. The pilot could not remember the details of the flight after the right wing made contact. The airplane came to rest nose low, hanging from a tree, with the nose of the airplane approximately 1 foot from the ground. A Federal Aviation Administration inspector examined the spinner on the right engine. According to the inspector, the right spinner had a 1/2-inch crack that started at its base and ran perpendicular to the rotation of the propeller. The crack then transitioned to a tear that ran parallel to the direction of rotation, and proceeded 1/3 the way around the spinner. The fracture surface for the crack was gray, and the fracture surface for the tear was shiny. According to the preflight inspection section of the pilot's operating handbook (POH), the pilot was to check the propeller and spinner for "nicks, security and oil leaks." In addition, the POH stated that the minimum single-engine control speed was 81 knots, and the recommended safe single-engine speed was 92 knots. The POH also stated, "although the aircraft is controllable at the minimum control speed, the aircraft's performance is so far below optimum that continued flight near the ground is improbable. The procedure for executing a single engine go-around published in the POH was (1) "If absolutely necessary and speed is above 92 KIAS, increase engine speed to 2,700 RPM and apply full throttle." (2) "Landing Gear - UP". (3) "Wing Flaps - UP (if extended)." (4) "Cowl Flaps - Open." (5) "Climb at 107 KIAS (95 KIAS with obstacles directly ahead)." (6) "Trim aircraft for single-engine climb." According to the ASA Dictionary of Aeronautical Terms, minimum controllable airspeed (VMC) is "the lowest airspeed at which an airplane is controllable with one engine developing takeoff power and the propeller on the other engine windmilling. VMC is marked on an airspeed indicator with a red radial line." While at 5,000 feet in VMC, the right engine spinner look unusual to the pilot. He reduced the throttle, but could not identify the problem, so he secured the engine. A tear in the spinner was identified. The pilot restarted the engine, but then shut it down because of a vibration. The pilot advised ATC that he had secured the engine, and needed to divert. While on short final, the pilot realized he would not make his intended touchdown point, because the airplane was too high. With the airplane 'sinking excessively,' the pilot decided to go around. He advanced the throttle on the left engine, the airplane rolled right, and then impacted trees. The right spinner had a 1/2-inch crack that started at its base and ran perpendicular to the rotation of the propeller. The crack then transitioned to a tear. The fracture surface for the crack was grayish in color, and consistent with fatigue. The POH stated that the pilot was to check the propeller and spinner for 'nicks, security and oil leaks,' prior to flight. The recommended safe single-engine speed for the airplane was 92 knots. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2000_NYC00LA246.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper
A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research)
Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace)
Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗