NTSB CAROL · Event
Event NYC02LA148
Registry · N99754
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
BIRD CK
Year of manufacture
1931 · 71 years old at event
Engine
KINNER B5 SERIES (125 hp)
Seats / Engines
3 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
20000412
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S ADEFC8
Registrant of record
BEINHAUER RICHARD G
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's improper decision to perform a 180-degree turn with insufficient altitude remaining after experiencing a total loss of power. A factor related to the accident was the inadequate alignment of the fuel selector placard markings, resulting in an inaccurate selector position and the subsequent total loss of engine power due to fuel starvation.
Factual narrative
On July 28, 2002, about 1950 eastern daylight time, a Bird CK, N99754, was substantially damaged during a forced landing after takeoff at the Shenandoah Valley Regional Airport (SHD), Harrisonburg, Virginia. The certificated commercial pilot sustained minor injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan had been filed for the local personal flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. According to the pilot, he departed from runway 23, a 6,000-foot long, 150-foot wide, asphalt runway. He stated that the takeoff and climb were normal, and that when the airplane was about 200 feet above the departure end of the runway, the engine lost total power. Due to insufficient runway length remaining, and no clear areas along the flight path, the pilot elected to attempt a 180-degree turn back toward a parallel taxiway near runway 23. As the airplane descended in the turn, it impacted two un-occupied airplanes in a tie-down area located south of the runway. In addition, the pilot stated that the engine stopped without warning, and he did not observe any smoke, or hear strange noises. According to a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector, examination of the accident airplane revealed damage to the upper and lower wings, the engine, propeller, and main landing gear. The inspector also noted that when the fuel selector valve was selected from the "OFF" position, to the "ON" position, the engine would start, and run at idle power. When the throttle was advanced to 1,500 rpm, the engine would run for approximately 20 seconds before losing total power. When the fuel selector was selected 3/8-inches from the "OFF" position, the engine would run with no anomalies. Examination of the fuel valve revealed that it was not manufactured with detents. A review of FAA-H-8083-3, Airplane Flying Handbook, revealed: "...If an actual engine failure should occur immediately after takeoff and before a safe maneuvering altitude is attained, it is usually inadvisable to attempt to turn back to the field from where the takeoff was made. Instead, it is safer to immediately establish the proper glide attitude, and select a field directly ahead or slightly to either side of the takeoff path." According to airport personnel at SHD, the surrounding airport area consisted of pasture fields with small tree lines. Weather, about the time of the accident, included wind from 230 degrees at five knots, and a visibility of ten statute miles. During the takeoff, about 200 feet above the departure end of the runway, the engine lost total power, and the pilot elected to attempt a 180-degree turn back to a parallel taxiway near the runway. As the airplane descended in the turn, it impacted two un-occupied airplanes in a tie-down area located south of the runway. Examination of the wreckage revealed that when the fuel selector valve was selected to the "ON" position, and power was applied, the engine would lose power. When the fuel selector was selected 3/8-inches from the "OFF" position, the engine would run with no anomalies. The fuel valve was not manufactured with detents. A review of FAA-H-8083-3, Airplane Flying Handbook, revealed, "...If an actual engine failure should occur immediately after takeoff and before a safe maneuvering altitude is attained, it is usually inadvisable to attempt to turn back to the field from where the takeoff was made. Instead, it is safer to immediately establish the proper glide attitude, and select a field directly ahead or slightly to either side of the takeoff path." Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2002_NYC02LA148.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (fuel starvation, engine failure). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Simulation of Liquid Rocket Engine Failure Propagation Using Self-Evolving Scenarios
Traditional probabilistic risk assessment approaches often require failure scenarios to be explicitly defined through event sequences that are then quantified as part of the integrated analysis.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Rocket engine failure detection using system identification techiques
The theoretical foundation and application of two univariate failure detection algorithms to Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) test firing data is presented.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Rocket engine failure detection using system identification techniques
The theoretical foundation and application of two univariate failure detection algorithms to Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) test firing data is presented.
- NTSB Aircraft Accident Reports 2010 · Accident report
Loss of Thrust in Both Engines After Encountering a Flock of Birds — US Airways 1549
US Airways 1549 (A320) Hudson River ditching, January 15, 2009. NTSB investigation of the successful ditching of US Airways 1549 in the Hudson River after a Canada Goose strike disabled both CFM56 eng…
- FAA-affiliated R&D (MITRE / Volpe / FAA Tech Center) 2019 · FAA Tech Center certification report
Engine Bird Ingestion Certification Testing — Large Flocking Birds
Hughes Technical Center bird-ingestion certification testing for turbofan engines — drove revisions to FAR 33.76 large-bird ingestion thresholds after the Hudson River ditching (NTSB AAR-11/01).
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Other - NASA Technical Note (TN)
Erosion Resistance and Failure Mechanisms of Several Nozzle Materials in a Small Solid-Propellant Rocket Engine
Erosion resistance and failure mechanisms of nozzle materials in small solid-propellant rocket engine
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗