SEA07LA092
2007-04-06 · Lincoln, California, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport LHM
N4379A has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (EA VISION EA J100), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
An in-flight fire occurred during the initial climb as a result of the aviation maintenance technician's failure to sufficiently tighten the b-nut that was found disconnected post-accident. A contributing factor was the engine manufacturer's failure to specify a torque value.
Factual narrative
On April 6, 2007, at 1145 Pacific daylight time, a Piper PA-32R-301T (Saratoga), N4379A, experienced an in flight fire shortly after takeoff from Lincoln Regional Airport/ Karl Harder Field, Lincoln, California, and the airplane was substantially damaged during a forced, off-airport landing. The pilot was operating the airplane under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91 for the local personal flight. The private pilot and one passenger were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed. The pilot stated that after departing runway 15, the airplane climbed to approximately 1,000 feet above ground level. He noticed a puff of white smoke emit from the defrost vents. The pilot brought the nose of the airplane down and there was a fire on the right side of the engine. He elected to immediately return to the airport to land. As he rolled onto the base leg of the traffic pattern, he heard a "pop" noise and black smoke poured from underneath the cowling. The engine lost complete power and the pilot force-landed the airplane in a field. The wreckage was examined on April 11, 2007, at Plain Parts, Pleasant Grove, California. The National Transportation Safety Board investigator, the Federal Aviation Administration accident coordinator, and representatives from New Piper Aircraft Company and Textron Lycoming were present. The top and bottom cowlings were removed. The majority of the thermal damage was evident on the right side of the engine as viewed from the pilot's (left) seat. Investigators noted that the fuel injection line of the number 5 cylinder was disconnected at the fitting of the manifold assembly, located below the number 3 cylinder assembly. The b-nut was off the threads of the fitting and floating along the steel fuel line. The fuel line, b-nut, and fitting threads were visually undamaged. The fuel line b-nut was reassembled to the manifold assembly. The b-nut threaded onto the fitting without binding and was tightened as required. No other anomalies were noted. At the time of the accident, the tachometer indicated 1,178.9 hours. Review of the maintenance records showed that the last annual inspection was performed on December 6, 2006, at tachometer time of 1,173.5 hours. During the annual inspection, the number 5 cylinder assembly was changed, corresponding to 5.4 hours prior to the accident. Since the annual inspection, no additional maintenance had been logged in the maintenance records. According to the Textron Lycoming representative, there are no Textron Lycoming published torque values for the subject b-nut. The National Transportation Safety Board investigator interviewed the aviation maintenance technician with inspector's authorization (AMT/IA) who inspected the last work completed on the airplane. He indicated that the aviation maintenance technician (AMT) performing the work used standard maintenance procedures as specified in the Textron Lycoming Overhaul Manual to change the number 5 cylinder. Following the work, the engine was run for 5 minutes. It was then brought through a full run up and to full power. No fuel leaks were noted. The AMT/IA stated that there was no Textron Lycoming specified torque value for the fuel lines, and they were tightened as required. After the work was completed, the AMT/IA performed the final inspection and the airplane was signed off as airworthy. The pilot experienced an in flight fire after takeoff and force-landed the airplane short of the runway. The pilot performed a preflight and run up that were uneventful. As the airplane climbed through 1,000 feet, he saw a puff of white smoke. He elected to return to land and as he neared the airport, a fire erupted, and he landed in a field. At 5.4 hours prior to the accident, the number 5 cylinder was replaced. Post accident examination showed that the fuel injection line of the number 5 cylinder was disconnected at the fitting of the manifold assembly, located below the number 3 cylinder assembly. The b-nut was off the threads of the fitting and floating along the steel fuel line. The fuel line and b-nut were visually undamaged. The fuel line b-nut was reassembled to the manifold assembly without binding, and then it was tightened. No other anomalies were noted. The engine manufacturer representative stated that there are no manufacturer published torque values for the b-nut. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2007_SEA07LA092.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…