NTSB CAROL · Event
Event WPR10IA482
Registry · N124BK
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
BEECH F90
Year of manufacture
1979 · 31 years old at event
Engine
P&W PT6A SER (750 hp)
Seats / Engines
10 seats · 2 engines
Last airworthiness date
19990716
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A062B1
Registrant of record
ISR AVIATION LLC
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The partial retraction/collapse of the main landing gear during the landing roll for undetermined reasons.
Factual narrative
On September 28, 2010, about 1940 mountain daylight time, the ventral tail strakes of a Beechcraft F90 King Air, N124BK, contacted the runway during a go-around from the landing roll at Idaho Falls Regional Airport, Idaho Falls, Idaho. The commercial pilot, who was the sole occupant of the airplane, was not injured, but the airplane, which is owned and operated by MTB Investments LLC, sustained minor damage. The 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight, which departed West Yellowstone Airport, Yellowstone, Montana, about 25 minutes prior to the incident, was being operated in visual meteorological conditions. No flight plan had been filed. According to the pilot, during his straight-in approach to a planned full-stop landing, he lowered the gear, and subsequently all three green "gear-down" indicator lights illuminated and the red "gear unsafe" light terminated its illumination. He then made a normal touchdown on the main landing gear, but about the time that the nose gear was being lowered, the gear horn sounded, the red "gear unsafe" light illuminated, and the airplane began to settle toward the runway. The pilot therefore immediately initialed a go-around, and as the airplane was lifting off the runway surface, both ventral tail strakes and the ventral/tie down fin contacted the runway surface. After departing the pattern, the pilot performed a manual gear extension, and then flew by the tower to make sure that the landing gear appeared to be in the full down position. After the tower confirmed the position of the gear, the pilot made an uneventful landing. The initial post-incident inspection of the landing gear system revealed that the actuator rod that extends from the left main gear electro-mechanical actuator assembly had fractured. After being recovered to a hangar, further inspection revealed that the left main gear electro-mechanical actuator assembly had broken loose from both of its airframe mounting brackets, and the right main gear electro-mechanical actuator assembly had broken loose from one of its airframe mounting brackets. It was also determined that the circuit breaker that protects the gear actuator electrical circuit had popped. According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airworthiness Inspector from the Salt Lake City Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) who responded to the incident, after the airplane was recovered, the operator shipped both the left and right electro-mechanical actuator assemblies to Aerospace Turbine Rotables, Inc., for inspection and overhaul. Reportedly, during that process no anomalies were noted that would have contributed to a malfunction of the landing gear system or led to an uncommanded retraction of either main landing gear. The FAA Inspector also stated that upon inspection of the airplane's landing gear system, maintenance personnel did not find any evidence of an anomaly or malfunction that would have contributed to an uncommanded gear retraction. During a discussion with a representative of Hawker Beechcraft, it was determined that both the popped circuit breaker and the damage and/or fracturing of the brackets that mount the electro-mechanical actuators to the airframe are indicative of a situation where the load that should be carried by the landing gear mechanical over-center down locks has been transferred to the gear actuator assembly. In conversations with the NTSB Investigator-In-Charge, and with both the FAA Airworthiness Inspector who responded to the incident, and a later discussion with an FAA Operations Inspector from the same FAA FSDO, the pilot was adamant about the landing gear being down, the three green "gear safe" lights being illuminated, and the red "gear unsafe" light terminating its illumination. At the conclusion of the investigation it could not be determined why the load that should have been carried by the over-center down locks had been transferred to the landing gear actuator assemblies. According to the pilot, he lowered the landing gear handle during a straight-in approach to a planned full-stop landing. Subsequently all three green "gear safe" lights illuminated, and the red "gear unsafe" light terminated its illumination. The pilot executed a normal landing touchdown on the main landing gear; however, during the landing roll the gear warning horn sounded, the red "gear unsafe" light illuminated, and the airplane began to settle toward the runway. The pilot then executed a go-around, during which the tail contacted the runway. The pilot continued the go-around, lowered the gear manually, and made an uneventful landing. A postaccident inspection revealed that for reasons that were unable to be determined, the weight of the airplane, which should have been carried by the over-center gear down locks, had been carried by the gear actuator system instead. This led to the tripping of the circuit breaker protecting the actuator electrical system, and ultimately to structural failures within the mechanical portion of the actuator system, which allowed the landing gear to partially retract. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Main landing gear-Not specified - C
- C Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2010_WPR10IA482.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper
A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗