NTSB CAROL · Event
Event WPR12FA010
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot’s failure to maintain airspeed and control after takeoff, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHT
On October 13, 2011, about 1558 Pacific daylight time, a Flugzeugbau DG 1000 S glider, N7760A, impacted terrain in a nose-low attitude shortly after takeoff from the Cle Elum Municipal Airport (S93), Cle Elum, Washington. The commercial pilot, the sole occupant of the glider, was fatally injured. The 2-seat glider sustained substantial damage to the forward fuselage and wings. The glider was registered to Northwest Eagle Soaring LLC, and operated by the pilot under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the local flight. The accident occurred shortly after an automobile ground launch of the glider. The launch sequence was filmed in support of the production of a television commercial. A full-size sport utility vehicle was used to ground launch the glider; the launch commenced near the threshold of runway 7. The driver of the tow vehicle reported that he towed the glider multiple times in the days preceding the accident flight. The morning of the accident, the tow vehicle driver and glider pilot briefed the flight; the driver reported that the pilot instructed him to reach 70 mph in the tow vehicle as quickly as possible so the glider could become airborne. The pilot planned to become airborne and then circle back to the airport to land. The driver reported that he reached 70 mph near the midpoint of the runway and that he observed the glider, in his mirror, become airborne. A ground support person that was riding in the tow vehicle reported to the driver that the glider was aloft, but that the tow rope had broken, so he instructed the driver to exit the runway. The driver reported that shortly thereafter, he observed the glider nose-dive into the ground. A witness located near the accident site recorded a short video of the airplane on his cellular phone. The video captured the several seconds of the accident sequence prior to impact. The video images revealed that the glider began its takeoff roll near the approach end of runway 7, towed by the sport utility vehicle. As the tow vehicle accelerated, the glider became airborne and remained wings level, in ground effect, until about the midpoint of the runway. Shortly after reaching the midpoint of the runway, the glider pitched to a steep nose-high attitude and began to climb while still tethered to the tow vehicle. As the climb progressed, the tow rope slackened and fell to the ground. The glider then pitched to a cruise-like level attitude and remained over the runway, wings level, on an easterly heading about 200 feet above the runway. Near the departure end of the runway, the glider entered a steep banked turn to the right. The glider's nose dropped as the bank increased. As it descended, the glider rotated approximately 300 degrees from its initial departure heading before it impacted terrain in a steep nose-low attitude. Other witnesses located adjacent to the departure runway reported that the first stage of the automobile ground launch appeared normal, and the glider became airborne within the first one-third of the runway. Shortly thereafter, about three-quarters of the way down the runway, the glider pitched to a steep nose-high attitude. As the glider ascended through about 100 – 125 feet above the ground, the rope slackened. The glider continued to ascend, and then leveled off about 200 feet above the end of the runway. Shortly after, the glider entered a steep right bank and descended into the ground. As it descended, the glider turned approximately 300 degrees from its initial departure heading before it impacted terrain.
PERSONNEL INFORMATION
The pilot, age 53, held a commercial pilot certificate with glider, airplane single-engine land, single-engine sea and instrument ratings. The pilot also held a flight instructor certificate for airplane single-engine land, glider and instrument ratings. The pilot held a second-class airman medical certificate issued August 5, 2011, with a limitation that he wear corrective lenses. The pilot's logbook was not recovered for examination. On the pilot's most recent application for the medical certificate, he reported 1,610 total civilian flight hours.
AIRCRAFT INFORMATION
The DG-1000S tow-seat glider was manufactured in Germany by DG Flugzeugbau, Gmbh. The glider was largely constructed with composite materials and incorporated a retractable main landing gear. The glider was issued a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) airworthiness certificate in December of 2003. A review of the maintenance logbook revealed that an annual inspection was completed on September 28, 2011, at an airframe total time of 764 hours. Tow Vehicle: A full-size sport utility vehicle was used to tow the glider. The nylon tow rope used measured approximately 234 feet and was 5/16-inch in diameter.
METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION
The closest aviation weather observation was recorded at Ellensburg, Washington, about 17 miles southeast of the accident location, at 1553. The following conditions were reported: winds from 160 degrees at 9 knots, visibility 10 miles, sky condition clear, temperature 60 degrees Fahrenheit, dew point 35 degrees Fahrenheit, altimeter setting 30.09 inches of mercury.
AIRPORT INFORMATION
Cle Elum Municipal Airport is located in a valley at an elevation of 1,944 feet, and is surrounded by rising mountainous terrain. The airport has a hard-surfaced asphalt runway, which constitutes runways 07 and 25. Runway 07 is 2,552 feet long and 40 feet wide. The runway is bordered to the north by large conifer trees.
WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATION
The glider was mostly intact and came to rest in high grass adjacent to the departure end of runway 07. A postaccident examination of the glider by representatives from the NTSB and FAA showed extensive impact damage to the cockpit and forward section of the glider. Flight control continuity to the elevator, flight spoilers and ailerons was established. Examination of the glider revealed no evidence of a preexisting malfunction or failure that would have precluded normal operation. A complete examination report is contained within the public docket.
MEDICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL INFORMATION
An autopsy was coordinated by the Kittitas County Coroner, with the cause of death reported as multiple blunt force trauma. Toxicological tests on specimens recovered from the pilot were performed by the FAA Civil Aerospace Medical Institute. The results were negative for all screened drug substances and ingested alcohol. Refer to the toxicology report included in the public docket for specific test parameters and results.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The tow rope broke during the initial takeoff; however, examination of the rope and associated hardware showed no evidence of a preexisting malfunction or excessive wear that would have precluded normal operation. Witnesses reported that the glider became airborne within the first one-third of the runway during an automobile ground launch. The glider then pitched to a steep nose-high attitude and ascended through about 100 to 125 feet when the rope broke. The glider continued to ascend and momentarily leveled off near the end of the runway. The glider then entered a steep right bank angle turn and descended, turning about 300 degrees from its initial departure heading before it impacted terrain. Postaccident examination of the glider revealed no evidence of a malfunction or failure that would have precluded normal operation. The glider’s right turn and associated steep bank angle likely resulted in a significant loss of airspeed and subsequent aerodynamic stall at a low altitude, with insufficient altitude for the pilot to recover. It is also likely that the tow rope reached its maximum tensile load and broke as a result of the rapid pitch-up maneuver after takeoff. The reason for the rapid pitch up maneuver could not be determined. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Airspeed-Not attained/maintained - C
- C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Action-Incorrect action performance-Pilot - C
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Pilot - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2011_WPR12FA010.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗