WPR15LA139
2015-03-30 · Tucson, Arizona, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport TUS
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A partial loss of engine power during initial takeoff climb for reasons that could not be determined because postaccident examination revealed no evidence of a mechanical anomaly that would have precluded normal operation.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHTOn March 30, 2015, about 1115 mountain standard time, a Beech H35, N112F was substantially damaged during a forced landing following a loss of engine power at Tucson International Airport (TUS), Tucson, Arizona. The private pilot and two passengers were not injured. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the forward fuselage and empennage. The airplane was registered to Skyler Aviation, and operated by the pilot, under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91 as a personal flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed. The cross-country flight was originating at the time. In a written statement to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigator-in-charge (IIC), the pilot reported that prior to the flight he conducted a preflight check of the airplane, and noticed no abnormalities with the airplane. He taxied to runway 8 right, and proceeded to conduct his pre-takeoff check list, which included cycling the propeller and conducting an engine run up at 2,000 revolutions per minute (rpm). In addition, the pilot leaned the mixture until the engine hesitated, and advanced the mixture to maximize the cylinder head temperature. The pilot stated that during takeoff roll the airplane accelerated normally, and briefly became airborne at 80 knots. He said that he decided to keep the airplane on the ground until it was clear of the displaced threshold, and lifted off again. As the airplane ascended through about 50 feet above ground level, the engine "began sputtering." The pilot leaned and enriched the mixture, however, noticed no change in engine performance. He further stated that there was not enough runway left to land and he initiated a forced landing to an area of rough desert terrain. During the landing roll, the airplane struck vegetation and sustained substantial damage. AIRCRAFT INFORMATIONThe four-seat, low-wing, retractable-gear airplane, serial number (S/N) D-5200, was powered by a Continental Motors IO-470-N14B engine, S/N 096504, rated at 260 horse power. It was equipped with a Beechcraft Bonanza P/N 278-100 two bladed, constant speed propeller. Review of the airplane maintenance logbook revealed that the most recent annual inspection was completed on January 2, 2015, at the tachometer time of 1,903.8, and the total time of 2,026.18. The pilot stated that the maximum gross weight for the airplane was 2,900 pounds, and that the weight at the time of the accident was 2,700. However, the weight and balance revision in the flight manual supplement for N112F, dated December 11, 1975, indicated that the maximum gross weight for the airplane was 3,100 pounds. Using the empty weight of an airplane as determined by the weight and balance revision, the weight of the occupants, fuel, and baggage, the NTSB investigator-in-charge calculated that the gross weight at the time of departure was about 2,919 pounds. Using the manufacturer's Climb Performance chart, located in the Pilot's Operating Handbook, reported weather conditions and gross weight of the airplane at takeoff, the climb performance was calculated to be about 980 feet per minute. AIRPORT INFORMATIONThe four-seat, low-wing, retractable-gear airplane, serial number (S/N) D-5200, was powered by a Continental Motors IO-470-N14B engine, S/N 096504, rated at 260 horse power. It was equipped with a Beechcraft Bonanza P/N 278-100 two bladed, constant speed propeller. Review of the airplane maintenance logbook revealed that the most recent annual inspection was completed on January 2, 2015, at the tachometer time of 1,903.8, and the total time of 2,026.18. The pilot stated that the maximum gross weight for the airplane was 2,900 pounds, and that the weight at the time of the accident was 2,700. However, the weight and balance revision in the flight manual supplement for N112F, dated December 11, 1975, indicated that the maximum gross weight for the airplane was 3,100 pounds. Using the empty weight of an airplane as determined by the weight and balance revision, the weight of the occupants, fuel, and baggage, the NTSB investigator-in-charge calculated that the gross weight at the time of departure was about 2,919 pounds. Using the manufacturer's Climb Performance chart, located in the Pilot's Operating Handbook, reported weather conditions and gross weight of the airplane at takeoff, the climb performance was calculated to be about 980 feet per minute. The pilot reported that, after takeoff, the engine started to "sputter." He adjusted the fuel mixture control lever but noticed no change in engine performance. He determined that insufficient runway was available to land, so he initiated a forced landing into desert terrain. During the landing roll, the airplane struck vegetation and sustained substantial damage. Postaccident examination of the airplane, engine, and propeller revealed no evidence of preimpact mechanical anomalies that would have precluded normal operation, and the reason for the partial loss of power could not be determined. Review of the airplane manufacturer's climb performance chart revealed that, at the time of the accident, the weather and environmental conditions were within the airplane's takeoff performance limitations. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined - C
- — Environmental issues-Physical environment-Terrain-(general)-Contributed to outcome
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2015_WPR15LA139.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…