NTSB CAROL · Event
Event WPR17LA210
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
Partial retraction of the main landing gear during the landing roll for reasons that could not be determined because postaccident examination and functional testing of the gear revealed no anomalies.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHTOn September 20, 2017, at 1314 Pacific daylight time, a Cessna 210F airplane, N7330E, sustained substantial damage to the left horizontal stabilizer after the main landing gear collapsed during the landing roll at Sacramento Executive Airport, Sacramento, California. The private pilot and passenger, who held a flight instructor certificate, were not injured. The airplane had just been purchased by the private pilot, and at the time of the accident was registered to the previous owner. The airplane was being operated by the pilot under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a personal flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan had been filed for the local flight. Both occupants provided differing accounts of their operational roles during the flight. The pilot, who was seated in the left seat, stated shortly after the accident that this was his first flight in the airplane, and that it was his understanding that it would be a training flight. The instructor had no previous experience flying the Cessna 210 series and stated that he had explicitly explained to both the pilot and the pilot's mechanic (who had arranged for the two to fly together), that he would not be operating the airplanes controls or providing instruction, and that he was simply acting as an observer. The pilot stated that his intention was to perform a flight in the traffic pattern and then perform a touch-and-go landing. He reported that the flight was uneventful, and that he flew the airplane during the takeoff and landing approach legs, and that the instructor operated the landing gear handle, and was assisting with the flight controls during the landing roll. He stated that prior to landing, he visually confirmed the landing gear had extended by viewing them through the gear mirrors. Shortly after landing, the airplane began to shake and then after traveling about 100 ft, veered left. He immediately applied right rudder and felt the instructor was doing the same. The airplane then dropped onto its belly. The pilot did not complete an National Transportation Safety Board Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident/Incident Report Form 6120.1, provide any further updates to his statement, or respond to multiple requests to clarify the circumstances of the accident. The instructor provided an extensive statement, reporting that the mechanic who had approached him to fly requested that he be especially vigilant that the landing gear was down and locked before landing. The instructor reiterated in the statement that he did not manipulate any controls until the airplane began to veer off the runway, and that at no time did he operate the landing gear handle. The instructor reported that after the pilot extended the landing gear, he observed the green landing gear indicator light illuminate, and confirmed through the gear mirrors that they had extended. Photographs taken shortly after the accident revealed that the nose gear was in the extended position, and both main landing gear had partially retracted, with their gear doors remaining open. The flaps appeared to be fully extended. A series of three black skid marks were observed on the runway, swerving from the centerline through to the airplane's final resting location just left of the runway edge. The outer width of the skids marks were about 34 inches. TESTS AND RESEARCHLanding Gear Operation The landing gear and flaps are extended and retracted by hydraulic actuators, powered by an engine-driven hydraulic pump and a pressure accumulator. The nose gear retracts forward and up, with its doors remaining open when the gear is extended. The main gear rotates aft and up into wells under the fuselage, with the doors remaining closed except during gear transition. Both the main and nose gear have positive mechanical up and down locks, operated by separate hydraulic actuators. Limit switches control two position indicator lights, which show that the gear is either up (red), or down and locked (green). The limit switches are connected in series, so that all three gears must be locked before either indicator light comes on. During the extension sequence, the nose landing gear locks into position before the main gear. The landing gear is controlled by the pilot through a four-position gear handle. The handle positions are, "Up-Operating", "Up-Neutral", "Down-Neutral", and "Down-Operating". To reposition the gear, the handle is pulled out and moved to the desired operating position, then released. A detent holds the handle in the operating position until the cycle is completed, at which point the handle automatically returns to the cycle's respective neutral position. A safety switch, actuated by the nose gear strut, restricts the gear position handle to prevent inadvertent retraction whenever the nose strut is compressed by the weight of the airplane. The instructor stated that he could not specifically recall if the gear handle was in the "Down-Neutral" or "Down-Operating" position, but that the mechanic, who was one of the first to arrive on scene, immediately entered the cabin, turned on the master switch, and moved the gear handle. The mechanic provided a statement indicating that when he arrived at the airplane, the gear handle was in the "Down-Operating" position, and it was not until later when he lifted the airplane with a hoist that he turned on the airplanes master switch. As soon as he did, the gear completed its cycle, the gear handle moved to the "Down-Neutral" position, and the green indicator light came on. Landing Gear Testing The airplane was removed from the accident site and stored at the mechanic's shop, where it was mounted on jack stands and examined by an FAA inspector the following week. No mechanical anomalies were observed to the landing gear system, beyond damage to the gear doors. The gear was successfully extended and retracted multiple times utilizing the gear handle, and both the red and green gear position lights illuminated appropriately. The airplane was occupied by its new owner, a private pilot, and a flight instructor; they had just completed a personal flight. During the landing roll, the main landing gear partially collapsed and the airplane departed the runway surface, resulting in substantial damage to the left horizontal stabilizer. Both pilots gave conflicting statements regarding their roles during the flight but agreed that the landing gear was extended during the landing approach. Postaccident examination did not reveal any anomalies with the landing gear system that would have precluded normal operation, and the gear was successfully extended and retracted multiple times using the gear handle during the examination; therefore, the reason for the partial gear collapse could not be determined. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined - C
- — Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Main landing gear-Not specified
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2017_WPR17LA210.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type. Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2020 · Technical Memorandum (TM)
Evaluation Issues for a Flight Deck Interface; CAST SE-210 Output 2: Report 4 of 6
This report is part of a series of reports that addresses flight deck design and evaluation, written as a response to loss of control accidents.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
Utilizing Drones to Streamline Wildlife Hazard Management Efforts by Airport Operators
Airports operating under the Code of Federal Regulations Part 139 should conduct a wildlife hazard assessment (WHA) when some wildlife-strike events have occurred at or near the airport.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Contractor Report (CR)
Flight test investigation of certification issues pertaining to general-aviation-type aircraft with natural laminar flow
Development of Natural Laminar Flow (NLF) technology for application to general aviation-type aircraft has raised some question as to the adequacy of FAR Part 23 for certification of aircraft with sig…
- arXiv 2012 · arXiv preprint
A mathematical model of sap exudation in maple trees governed by ice melting, gas dissolution and osmosis
We develop a mathematical model for sap exudation in a maple tree that is based on a purely physical mechanism for internal pressure generation in trees in the leafless state.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2001 · Journal article (JAAER)
A Comparison of the Learning Styles of Aviation and Non-Aviation College Students
In contrast to established educational fields such as mathematics, the discipline of aviation education is relatively young.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 1992 · Journal article (JAAER)
A Turning Point in Aviation Training: The AQP Mandates Crew Resource Management and Line Operational Simulations
Crew Resource Management (CRM) and Line Oriented Flight Training (LOFT) have not been mandatory elements of air carrier flight crew training.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗