WPR18LA175
2018-05-29 · Lewiston, Idaho, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport LWS
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The failure of a hydraulic line in the landing gear system, which resulted in the pilot's inability to lower the gear and a subsequent gear-up landing.
Factual narrative
On May 29, 2018 about 0900 Pacific daylight time, a Cessna P210, N7546K, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Lewiston, Idaho. The private pilot, the sole occupant, was not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot reported that, following departure, he climbed to his planned enroute altitude of 7,500 ft mean sea level. He noticed that the airspeed was lower than expected and then saw that the landing gear position indicator light showed that the gear was not retracted. The pilot cycled the gear but was unable to fully extend or retract them. He then attempted to manually lower the landing gear with the emergency hand pump but was unsuccessful. He declared an emergency and subsequently landed with the gear retracted, resulting in substantial damage to the horizontal stabilizer spar. Examination revealed that the rigid hydraulic line connecting the powerpack to the bulkhead had failed at the ferrule. A review of the airplane's maintenance records revealed that, on March 13, 2018, at a tachometer time of 384 hours, a maintenance facility completed a check of the landing gear. A subsequent entry, dated May 17, 2018, and about 8.6 flight hours after the previous maintenance, stated, "Landing gear inop for up/dn. Pilot report did pump gear down." The entry indicated that personnel performed troubleshooting on the source of a hydraulic fluid leak, which they determined to be at the hydraulic power pack gear system. The entry stated that the tube fitting line cracked at the flare below the ferrule, and a new line of aluminum tubing the same size and length as the failed tubing was fabricated and installed. After climbing to cruise altitude, the pilot noted that the landing gear position indicator lights showed that the landing gear were not retracted, and the pilot was unable to fully extend or retract the gear. He declared an emergency and landed with the landing gear retracted, resulting in substantial damage to the horizontal stabilizer. Examination revealed that the rigid hydraulic line connecting the hydraulic powerpack to the bulkhead had failed at the ferrule. A review of maintenance records revealed that this line had recently been duplicated and replaced due to a failure in the same area. The reason for the failure was not determined based on the available evidence. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Main landing gear-Failure - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Gear extension and retract sys-Failure - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2018_WPR18LA175.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.