NTSB CAROL · Event
Event WPR18LA176
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot’s failure to maintain adequate airspeed while conducting a go-around and his exceedance of the airplane’s critical angle of attack, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall/spin at too low of an altitude to recover. Contributing to the accident were the pilot’s lack of preflight planning, including his failure to obtain a briefing on the challenging, one-way airstrip, and his unfamiliarity with operating into and out of the airstrip, which was surrounded by mountainous terrain.
Factual narrative
On June 21, 2018, about 1200 mountain daylight time, a Piper PA-18-150 airplane, N1979P, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Yellow Pine, Idaho. The pilot was seriously injured. The airplane was being operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The accident airplane was a part of a flight of three, which had departed Cabin Creek US Forest Service Airport (I08), Big Creek Ranger Station, Idaho, for Dewey Moore Airstrip, Cascade, Idaho, which is a remote, mountainous, backcountry airstrip. One of the pilots in the flight of three reported that, as they approached the Dewey Moore Airstrip, the lead airplane pilot surveyed the area, and he reported that there was no other traffic. Subsequently, he and the lead pilot landed uneventfully, and he noted that “the conditions were excellent, with calm air, and the runway in good condition”; he had landed there the previous day. He then parked his airplane at the top of the airstrip facing directly down the runway, which allowed him to easily see the approach to the airstrip. As he was waiting for the accident airplane to come into view, he asked him, “…you’ve been in here before, right”? The accident pilot replied that he had not. He then reminded the accident pilot to fly “low over the creek” and added that, when the accident airplane came into view, it was higher than the lead airplane had been on its approach. When the accident airplane had almost reached the extended runway centerline, the accident pilot added power, after which, the airplane pitched up steeply. It then continued flying upstream of a nearby creek for about 1/2 mile with the nose up and “not climbing well, if at all.” The airplane then entered a left turn away from his position and directly over the creek. Subsequently, the left wing dipped, and the airplane entered a left spin. The pilot stated that he then saw the airplane make 1 1/4 left rotations before it descended out of his sight and impacted terrain. He added that the engine sounded like it was developing full power from the time of the initial go-around until impact. The wreckage came to rest on sloping terrain. The airframe and wings were substantially damaged. The pilot’s brother and one of the pilots who witnessed the accident reported that there were no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane or engine that would have precluded normal operation. The pilot does not recall the events leading to the accident. Dewey Moore Airstrip is located at 4,494 ft mean sea level. The single gravel runway, 28/10, is a one-way in, one-way out airstrip: airplanes landed on runway 28 and departed from runway 10. The remarks section of the plan view of the airstrip recommended that it be used “only by mountain proficient pilots who have had a checkout specific to the airstrip.” In an Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association video made after the pilot had recovered from his injuries, the pilot stated that he was negligent in planning for the flight, which included not obtaining a briefing on the airstrip. The pilot also mentioned his lack of proficiency at the time of the accident. The private pilot was conducting a personal, cross-country flight as part of a flight of three. One of the pilots reported that, as the flight of three approached the one-way-in, 700-ft-long remote mountain airstrip, the lead pilot surveyed the area, and he reported that no other airplanes were in the area. Subsequently, he and the lead pilot landed at the airstrip uneventfully. After landing, he parked his airplane at the top of the airstrip facing directly down the runway, which allowed him to easily see the approach path to the airstrip. As he was waiting for the accident airplane to come into view, he asked the accident pilot “…you’ve been in here before, right”? The accident pilot replied that he had not, and the other pilot then reminded the accident pilot to fly “low over the creek.” He added that, when the accident airplane came into view, it was higher than the lead airplane had been on its approach. When the accident airplane had almost reached the extended runway centerline, the accident pilot added power, after which, the airplane pitched up steeply. The airplane then continued upstream of a nearby creek for about 1/2 mile with the nose up and “not climbing well, if at all.” The airplane then entered a left turn, followed by the left-wing dipping and the airplane entering a left spin. The pilot stated that he saw the airplane make 1 1/4 rotations before it descended out of his sight and impacted terrain and that the engine sounded like it was developing full power from the time of the initial go-around until impact. The pilot’s brother and one of the pilots who witnessed the accident reported that there were no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane or engine that would have precluded normal operation. The pilot does not recall the events leading to the accident. Therefore, based on the available information, it is likely that the pilot failed to maintain adequate airspeed and exceeded the airplane’s critical angle of attack during the go-around, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall/spin at too low of an altitude to recover. The accident flight was the accident pilot’s first attempt to land at the airstrip, which is confined by mountainous terrain and requires pilots to land one way and depart the other with virtually no go-around options during the approach. A plan view of the airstrip recommended that it “be used only by mountain proficient pilots who have had a checkout specific to the airstrip.” In an Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association video made after the accident pilot recovered from his injuries, he stated that he was negligent in planning for the flight, which included not having obtained a briefing on the airstrip. The pilot also mentioned his lack of proficiency at the time of the accident. Therefore, contributing to the accident were the pilot’s failure to obtain a briefing on the airstrip, lack of planning for the flight, and unfamiliarity with the airstrip. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- — Personnel issues-Task performance-Planning/preparation-Flight planning/navigation-Pilot
- — Personnel issues-Experience/knowledge-Knowledge-Knowledge of procedures-Pilot
- — Personnel issues-Action/decision-Info processing/decision-Decision making/judgment-Pilot
- — Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Airspeed-Not attained/maintained
- — Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Pilot
- — Environmental issues-Physical environment-Terrain-Mountainous/hilly terrain-Decision related to condition
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2018_WPR18LA176.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, go-around). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper
A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗