WPR22LA137
2022-03-24 · Lanark, New Mexico, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Current FAA registration · N823MM
- Make / Model
- CZECH SPORT AIRCRAFT A S SPORTCRUISER
- Year of manufacture
- 2015 · 7 years old at event
- Engine
- ROTAX 912ULS SERIES (100 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 2 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 20200518
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S AB3D1F
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot’s loss of control of the airplane after the inadvertent unlocking and opening of the canopy for reasons that could not be determined based on available evidence.
Factual narrative
On March 24, 2022, about 1845 mountain daylight time, a Czech Sport Aircraft Sportcruiser airplane, N823MM, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Lanark, New Mexico. The pilot sustained minor injuries. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot stated the purpose of the flight was to calibrate a new angle-of-attack gauge that had been recently installed in the airplane. He climbed the airplane to an altitude of about 6,500 ft mean sea level and performed a power-off stall. As the nose of the airplane dropped, the left canopy latch “broke loose.” About 4 to 5 seconds later, the right canopy latch “blew open,” and the entire windscreen “popped up like a speed brake.” The airplane’s pitch remained nose down and the airplane impacted terrain, substantially damaging the left wing and fuselage. GPS data from a recovered device were consistent with the pilot’s statement. Postaccident examination of the wreckage revealed no preimpact anomalies with the canopy or canopy operating system. The canopy locking handle was located on the back console panel between the two cockpit seats and was attached to a connecting rod equipped with identical locking hook mechanisms on each side of the fuselage/canopy opening. The canopy locking mechanisms disengaged and engaged simultaneously when the handle was manipulated. The locking mechanisms disengaged when the locking handle was pulled up and engaged fully (locked) when it was pushed fully down into a stowed position. The locking mechanisms consisted of a welded tab on the connecting rod joined to a pushrod that was attached to the canopy latch. When the canopy locking handle was lifted, an over-center position was reached after about 1/4 inch of upward movement of the locking handle. The locking handle traveled about 3 additional inches before the locking mechanisms reached the fully disengaged position. The pilot was performing a power-off stall at about 6,500 ft mean sea level during a personal flight. He stated that, as the nose of the airplane dropped, the left canopy latch “let loose.” About 4 to 5 seconds later, the right canopy latch “let go,” and the entire windscreen “popped up like a speed brake.” The airplane’s pitch remained nose down, and the airplane impacted terrain, substantially damaging the left wing and fuselage. Postaccident examination of the wreckage found no preimpact anomalies with the canopy or canopy operating system. Although the pilot reported that the left-side latch came loose before the right-side latch, the examination found that the locking mechanisms engaged and disengaged from both sides of the canopy at the same time when the canopy locking handle was lowered and raised. Examination of the canopy locking system showed that the canopy locking handle required about 1/4 inch of upward movement from the locked and stowed position for the locking mechanisms to reach an over-center position that effectively unlocked the canopy. The accident circumstances were consistent with the pilot’s loss of control of the airplane during flight after the inadvertent unlocking and opening of the canopy. The reason that the canopy locking handle became unstowed during the accident flight could not be determined based on the available evidence from the investigation. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Aircraft-Aircraft systems-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined
- — Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Altitude-Attain/maintain not possible
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2022_WPR22LA137.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, loss of control). All research papers
- Semantic Scholar 2016 · Article (Interacción) Trajectory Recovery System: Angle of Attack Guidance for Inflight Loss of Control
This paper describes the design and development of an ecological display to aid pilots in the recovery of an In-Flight Loss of Control event due to a Stall (ILOC-S).
- NTSB Aircraft Accident Reports 2010 · Accident report Loss of Control on Approach — Colgan Air Flight 3407
Colgan Air 3407 / Continental Connection (Q400) Buffalo NY, February 12, 2009 — 50 fatalities. Definitive investigation of the Colgan 3407 stall-stick-pusher crash on approach to Buffalo.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER) A Scoping Review of Aviation Loss of Control Inflight Research
Loss of control – inflight (LOC-I) contributes to aircraft accidents at unacceptably high rates. Significant industry efforts and research have aimed to improve LOC-I prevention, detection, and recove…
- SKYbrary (Eurocontrol) 2024 · SKYbrary article Loss of Control In-Flight (LOC-I) — SKYbrary Knowledge Base
SKYbrary comprehensive knowledge-base entry on Loss of Control In-Flight — definitions, contributing factors, accident case studies (Air France 447, Colgan 3407), and prevention strategies.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (International Conference on Networking and Services) Risk Assessment of Loss of Control In-Flight Trajectories for Urban Air Mobility Safety
In Urban Air Mobility (UAM), maintaining a minimum separation between aircraft is a safety requirement, which becomes challenging amidst congested air traffic and off-nominal conditions, such as Loss …