NTSB CAROL · Event
Event WPR25LA248
Registry · N189GC
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
DEHAVILLAND DHC-6-300
Year of manufacture
1981 · 44 years old at event
Engine
P&W CANADA PT6A-27 (680 hp)
Seats / Engines
22 seats · 2 engines
Last airworthiness date
20150315
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A162B4
Registrant of record
CORTEZ FISHER LLC
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Factual narrative
On August 9, 2025, about 1240 Pacific daylight time, a De Havilland DHC-6-300, N189GC, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Whitmore, Arizona. Six passengers sustained minor injuries, and the captain, first officer and remaining eight passengers were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 135 on-demand air taxi flight. The flight departed from Boulder City Municipal Airport (BVU), Boulder City, Nevada, to transport the passengers to Grand Canyon Bar Ten Airstrip (1Z1), Whitmore, Arizona, where they were scheduled to begin a river tour. The airplane was the second in a group of four, that were due to arrive at about the same general time. The first airplane to depart was a Cessna 208 (Caravan), with the remaining three airplanes all similarly equipped DHC-6-300’s. 1Z1 is a remote airstrip, located at an elevation of 4,100 ft mean sea level (msl), within a 2 ½ mile wide valley, surrounded by steep rising terrain. It had a single, 4,600 ft long by 40 ft wide north/south oriented runway, 4,000 ft of which was composed of a 33 ft-wide asphalt chip seal surface. The airstrip did not have a weather reporting station, and the crew checked area weather before departure, which indicated gusting winds out of the west. The pre-flight preparations, boarding, and enroute cruise segment of the flight were uneventful, with the first officer flying the airplane. During the final stages of cruise flight, the crew checked the weather at Grand Canyon West airport (1G4) (38 miles southwest of 1Z1), which indicated wind from 270° at 13 knots, gusting to 22 knots. The crew consulted with the Caravan pilot, who had just departed the area after dropping off passengers, and he stated the wind conditions were strong, variable, and gusting, but favoring runway 16. The crew discussed the arrival and landing procedures and decided that based on prevailing wind conditions and terrain clearance should they need to perform a go-around, runway 16 was the most prudent choice. They then configured the airplane for descent, with the captain assuming the role of pilot flying. The captain reported that the final approach was stable, on speed, on centerline, and although gusting winds were causing changes in airspeed, they were not enough to require large changes in engine power. Due to the westerly winds, the captain was maintaining a crab angle while the airplane was on final, and as they got closer to the runway, she could see the windsocks were “pegged” and indicating winds directly out of the west. The captain reported that shortly after touchdown, which was between 500 and 1,000 ft beyond the threshold, she was able to maintain directional control with right aileron and left rudder control input, and the airplane tracked down the runway centerline while she retarded the engine power levers to the zero-thrust position. As they approached the runway midpoint, the captain described a sensation that felt as if the airplane was being “pushed”. She maintained full left rudder input and began to release the right aileron control pressure. The airplane then departed the runway surface to the right and entered the dirt edge of the paved surface. She was still able to maintain the runway heading but could not direct the airplane back onto the paved surface. The gravel area became bumpier, and as they approached a ditch, the captain applied aft control yoke to raise the nose, and prevent the nose gear from digging in. Ground disruptions and runway markings were consistent with the airplane swerving left as the terrain rose. The left wingtip then struck the runway, and the airplane then began a sharp right turn, about the time the captain reported applying brakes and retarding the engine controls further. The airplane then struck a deep ditch, just beyond, and to the right of the departure end of the runway, where it came to rest upright. The crew secured the airplane while evacuating the passengers. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the left wing, and entire forward fuselage structure during the accident sequence. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2025_WPR25LA248.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper
A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research)
Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace)
Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗