ANC21FA028
2021-03-28 · Anchorage, Alaska, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport LHD
Current FAA registration · N1968P
- Make / Model
- PIPER PA-18A
- Year of manufacture
- 1957 · 64 years old at event
- Engine
- LYCOMING 0-320 SERIES (180 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 2 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19980817
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A181F3
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A total loss of engine power for reasons that could not be determined based on the available evidence.
Factual narrative
On March 28, 2021, about 1600 Alaska daylight time, a Piper PA-18-A, N1968P, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Anchorage, Alaska. The pilot received minor injuries. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot reported that he departed with about 18 gallons of fuel onboard the airplane and initially selected the left fuel tank for takeoff, and then switched to the right fuel tank after the airplane was established in cruise flight. Nearing the destination, he switched the fuel tank selector back to the left fuel tank for landing and applied the carburetor heat. He added that, the traffic he was following was asked to extend their landing for additional traffic and requested a long landing. He subsequently slowed the airplane to approach speed for spacing and applied half flaps. As the pilot was starting his final approach, the engine lost partial power, followed by a complete loss of power. He switched the fuel tank selector back to the right fuel tank and turned off the carburetor heat while pitching to obtain best glide speed. Unable to clear the obstacles, he “turned left (south)” to line up with a nearby road. He then applied full flaps and declared an emergency. During the forced landing, the left wing impacted a light pole and the airplane spun to the left before impacting the ground in a nose-down attitude. When the airplane came to a stop, the pilot stated there was gas “pouring out of something” behind him. He moved the fuel selector to the “OFF” position and exited the airplane without further incident. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the left wing and fuselage. When the temperature and dew point were entered into the Federal Aviation’s carburetor icing probability graph, it revealed a low likelihood of carburetor icing conditions. During the recovery from the accident site, about 4.4 gallons of fuel was drained from the airplane, about 2 gallons per wing tank. A Federal Aviation Administration inspector examined the airplane after recovery. He drained about 2 cups of clean fuel out of the gascolator. The engine controls and cables were all attached, and continuity was established. He noted that the carburetor was broken on the engine mount and contained no fuel. The fuel system exhibited continuity with no blockages noted. The spark plugs appeared normal and the engine exhibited internal continuity. Compression was found on all cylinders. The magnetos were removed and sent to a local test facility, where they operated as designed. No preaccident mechanical failures or malfunctions were found with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. Before landing, the pilot selected a different fuel tank, and during final approach, the engine lost total power. The pilot switched fuel tanks while maneuvering the airplane for a forced landing, during which the left wing impacted a light pole and the airplane spun to the left before impacting the ground in a nose-down attitude. A postaccident examination of the airplane revealed no mechanical failures or malfunctions that would have precluded normal operation, and the reason for the loss of engine power could not be determined based on the available information. The temperature and due point spread made it unlikely for carburetor icing conditions at the time of the accident. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2021_ANC21FA028.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing). All research papers
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Enabling Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight Drones Operation over Open RAN 5G Networks with Slicing
Among the foretold claims of the transition from 5G to 6G, Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight (BVLoS) drone operation has emerged as a prominent Internet-of-Robots enabler.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR) Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Presentation NASA Icing Update – March 2025
This NASA Icing Update was prepared for presentation to the SAE International AC-9C Inflight Icing Technology Committee. This update includes the following topics: planned Rotational Icing Scaling tes…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER) A Mathematical Model on the Temporal Dynamics of Aviation Competitive Pricing
This study investigates the competitive dynamics of airport pricing using U.S. airport data to validate the findings. It employs linear and nonlinear ordinary differential equation models to analyze t…
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint An energy-stable phase-field model for droplet icing simulations
A phase-field model for three-phase flows is established by combining the Navier-Stokes (NS) and the energy equations, with the Allen-Cahn (AC) and Cahn-Hilliard (CH) equations and is demonstrated ana…