NTSB CAROL · Event
Event ANC22FA053
Registry · N4340C
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
CHAMPION 7EC
Year of manufacture
1955 · 67 years old at event
Engine
CONT MOTOR C90 SERIES (95 hp)
Seats / Engines
2 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
19551019
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A53455
Registrant of record
ANDERSEN ANDY
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot’s decision to continue visual flight rules flight into instrument meteorological conditions which resulted in loss of control and collision with terrain.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHTOn July 11, 2022, about 1730 Alaska daylight time, a Champion 7EC airplane, N4340C, was destroyed when it was involved in an accident about 20 miles northeast of Valdez, Alaska. The student pilot was fatally injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot departed from Valdez Pioneer Field Airport (VDZ), Valdez, and was returning to a private airstrip in Sutton, Alaska. When the pilot did not arrive in Sutton, family and friends reported the airplane overdue. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued an alert notice at 2246, and search personnel from the Civil Air Patrol, Alaska State Troopers, Alaska Air National Guard, and the U.S. Coast Guard, along with several volunteers, searched for the overdue airplane. Due to poor weather conditions along the anticipated flight route and the lack of an emergency locator transmitter (ELT) signal, the wreckage was not located until July 14th in an area known as Thompson Pass, at an elevation of about 2,560 ft mean sea level. Multiple witnesses along the route of flight reported seeing the airplane flying just above the trees in very poor weather conditions. PERSONNEL INFORMATIONThe student pilot had a solo cross-country endorsement dated March 21, 2022, with limitations of 2,500-ft cloud ceiling, 10 knots of wind, and 5 statute miles visibility; the endorsement expired on June 29, 2022. The pilot’s flight instructor stated that he did not provide any flight planning training for a flight to Valdez and the pilot did not have a cross-country solo endorsement for a flight to Valdez. The instructor had not provided any instruction in flight by reference to instruments to the accident pilot because the pilot’s airplane was not equipped for instrument flight. METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATIONAn AIRMET Sierra advisory was issued at 1206, valid for the accident site at the accident time, that forecast mountain obscuration conditions due to clouds and precipitation. The Area Forecast valid for the accident site at the accident time was issued at 1204 and forecast few clouds at 600 ft above ground level (agl), with broken clouds at 3,000 agl. After 1600, the Terminal Aerodrome Forecast (TAF) for VDZ expected variable wind at 3 knots, 3 miles visibility, light rain, mist, few clouds at 800 ft agl, a broken ceiling at 1,500 ft agl, overcast clouds at 8,000 ft agl, and cloud tops at 18,000 ft with occasional light rain. The accident pilot did not request nor receive weather information from FAA Flight Services or ForeFlight. A search of archived ForeFlight information indicated that the accident pilot did have a ForeFlight account, which recorded several route string combinations retrieved before the accident flight. It is unknown what, if any, additional weather information the accident pilot viewed before or during the accident flight.An FAA weather camera near the accident site showed near-zero visibility and a cloud layer near the surface (see Figure 1), when compared to the clear day image from the same camera. (see Figure 2.) Figure 1. Weather camera at Thompson Pass, AK Figure 2. Clear day visual of Thompson Pass camera WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATIONThe airplane impacted an area of tundra and rock-covered terrain in a near-vertical attitude. Flight control continuity was established from the cockpit to all flight control surfaces. The right aileron cable was separated near the upper pulley in the cockpit, consistent with tension overload. The fuselage had numerous broken frame tubes consistent with impact damage. Fuselage was detached from the wings at the wing attachment points and the firewall. The fuselage came to rest inverted with the tail 90 degrees to the right of the direction of travel. Both wings displayed leading edge impact damage. Both ends of the propeller were curled back toward the spinner with rotational scratches/scoring along the cambered side of the blade. There was evidence of fuel blight and a strong smell of fuel at the accident site. The exhaust, induction, and fuel systems were crushed from impact. Both magnetos remained attached to the engine with no damage. MEDICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL INFORMATIONToxicology testing indicated that the pilot had used cannabis some time before the accident; however, neither the primary psychoactive compound, THC, nor its short-lived psychoactive metabolite, 11-hydroxy-delta-9-THC, were detected in his blood or urine. The non-psychoactive metabolite, THC-COOH, was detected in blood and urine at very low levels. The student pilot was conducting a solo cross-country flight when he did not arrive at his destination as expected. The wreckage was located three days later at an elevation of about 2,560 ft mean sea level in an area of tundra and rock-covered terrain. Examination indicated that the airplane impacted terrain in a near-vertical attitude. There were no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or anomalies of the airplane that would have precluded normal operation, and the propeller displayed evidence that the engine was producing power at the time of impact. Multiple witnesses along the route of flight reported seeing the airplane flying just above the trees in very poor weather conditions. Weather camera images taken near the accident site around the time of the accident showed near-zero visibility and clouds near the surface. Although these conditions had been forecast, there was no record of the pilot obtaining weather information from an access-controlled source before he departed on the flight. Review of the pilot’s flight training history and endorsements revealed that he did not possess a valid solo cross-country endorsement for the accident flight. The pilot’s flight instructor had not provided any instruction in flight by reference to instruments because the pilot’s airplane was not equipped for instrument flight. Although toxicology testing of the pilot indicated that he had used cannabis at some point before the accident, given that no psychoactive compounds were identified in blood and that urine and blood concentrations of the inactive metabolite, THC-COOH, do not necessarily reflect recent use, it is unlikely that the pilot’s use of cannabis contributed to the accident. Based on the wreckage signature and weather at the time of the accident, the pilot likely lost control of the airplane while maneuvering after encountering near-zero visibility in the dense cloud cover. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- — Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Ceiling/visibility/precip-Low ceiling-Decision related to condition
- — Personnel issues-Experience/knowledge-Experience/qualifications-Total experience-Pilot
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2022_ANC22FA053.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (loss of control). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER)
A Scoping Review of Aviation Loss of Control Inflight Research
Loss of control – inflight (LOC-I) contributes to aircraft accidents at unacceptably high rates. Significant industry efforts and research have aimed to improve LOC-I prevention, detection, and recove…
- SKYbrary (Eurocontrol) 2024 · SKYbrary article
Loss of Control In-Flight (LOC-I) — SKYbrary Knowledge Base
SKYbrary comprehensive knowledge-base entry on Loss of Control In-Flight — definitions, contributing factors, accident case studies (Air France 447, Colgan 3407), and prevention strategies.
- NTSB Aircraft Accident Reports 2022 · Accident report
Loss of Control on Takeoff in Icing Conditions — Citation 560XL
Cessna Citation 560XL fatal takeoff icing accident, March 2018. Investigation of a Citation 560XL loss-of-control takeoff accident in icing conditions.
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aviation)
ANALYSIS OF GENERAL AVIATION FIXED-WING AIRCRAFT ACCIDENTS INVOLVING INFLIGHT LOSS OF CONTROL USING A STATE-BASED APPROACH
Inflight loss of control (LOC-I) is a significant cause of General Aviation (GA) fixed-wing aircraft accidents. The United States National Transportation Safety Board’s database provides a rich source…
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Presentation
Use of Design of Experiments in Determining Neural Network Architectures for Loss of Control Detection
Abstract—We describe empirical methods for selecting a neural network architecture to implement belief state inference on generic commercial transport aircraft.
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Conference Paper
Use of Design of Experiments in Determining Neural Network Architectures for Loss of Control Detection
We describe empirical methods for selecting a neural network architecture to implement belief state inference on generic commercial transport aircraft.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗