CEN15CA324
2015-07-22 · San Antonio, Texas, United States · Serious · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport SSF
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's improper decision to attempt flight with an unairworthy airplane and improper starting procedure that resulted in an uncontrolled takeoff without the pilot aboard. Contributing was the inoperative airplane battery/engine starter.
Factual narrative
The pilot attempted to start the airplane engine by hand propping it because the engine could not be started using the starter because the battery was dead. The airplane had a chock under the left main landing gear wheel, and the pilot side door was propped open with a passenger aboard for the engine start. Upon engine start, the airplane jumped the chock and began to accelerate along the ground. The pilot ran along side of the airplane attempting to open the pilot side door, which had closed. When the airplane speed became too fast for the pilot to run alongside of the airplane, he stood on the main landing gear, holding the strut, and continued to attempt entry into the airplane while telling the passenger to pull the brake, throttle, mixture, or turn off the ignition key switch. The airplane impacted a 10-inch barrier, knocking the pilots legs off the main landing gear, and the airplane ran over the pilot's leg. The pilot pulled up onto the wing strut, still giving instruction to the passenger while attempting to enter the pilot side door, but the prop-wash was making this "feat impossible". About 59 mph, the airplane departed the airfield, becoming airborne, and at 6 feet above ground level, the pilot let go of the wing strut and fell to the ground. The airplane climbed, nosed forward, touched down on the nose landing gear, and impacted a construction dirt pilot before it nosed-over. The airplane sustained substantial damage that included damage to each wing spar and a bent empennage. The pilot sustained minor injuries, and the passenger sustained serious injuries. The airplane was not equipped with shoulder harnesses and was not required to be equipped with shoulder harnesses. The pilot's experience in hand-propping airplanes and the injuries of the passenger were unknown at the time this report was written. The pilot attempted to start the airplane engine by hand propping it because the engine could not be started using the starter because the battery was dead. The airplane had a chock under the left main landing gear wheel, and the pilot side door was propped open with a passenger aboard for the engine start. Upon engine start, the airplane jumped the chock and began to accelerate along the ground. The pilot ran along side of the airplane attempting to open the pilot side door, which had closed. When the airplane speed became too fast for the pilot to run alongside of the airplane, he stood on the main landing gear, holding the strut, and continued to attempt entry into the airplane while telling the passenger to pull the brake, throttle, mixture, or turn off the ignition key switch. The airplane impacted a 10-inch barrier, knocking the pilots legs off the main landing gear, and the airplane ran over the pilot's leg. The pilot pulled up onto the wing strut, still giving instruction to the passenger while attempting to enter the pilot side door, but the prop-wash was making this "feat impossible". About 59 mph, the airplane departed the airfield, becoming airborne, and at 6 feet above ground level, the pilot let go of the wing strut and fell to the ground. The airplane climbed, nosed forward, touched down on the nose landing gear, and impacted a construction dirt pilot before it nosed-over. The airplane sustained substantial damage that included damage to each wing spar and a bent empennage. The pilot sustained minor injuries, and the passenger sustained serious injuries. The airplane was not equipped with shoulder harnesses and was not required to be equipped with shoulder harnesses. The pilot's experience in hand-propping airplanes and the injuries of the passenger were unknown at the time this report was written. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Info processing/decision-Decision making/judgment-Pilot
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-(general)-Pilot
- F Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Electrical power system-Battery/charger-Inoperative
- — Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Equipment/furnishings-Passenger compartment equip-Not installed/available
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2015_CEN15CA324.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type. All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Memorandum (TM) A preliminary study of a wake vortex encounter hazard boundary for a B737-100 airplane
A preliminary batch simulation study was conducted to define the wake decay required for a Boeing 737-100 airplane to safely encounter a Boeing 727 wake and land.
- NASA NTRS 2018 · Other A Numerical Simulation Study to Develop an Acceptable Wake Encounter Boundary for a B737-100 Airplane
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is conducting research with the goal of enabling safe improvements in the capacity of the nation's air transportation system.
- NASA NTRS 2011 · Other A unified cleaning facility in a Class 100 clean room
Downdraft clean room for cleaning and potting of mechanical and electrical components and various plastics systems
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Quantifying the Reality Gap for RL-Based UAV Placement at mmWave and Sub-THz
Reinforcement learning (RL) policies for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) placement in mmWave and sub-terahertz networks are typically trained on simplified analytical channels.
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Tethered UAVs for Dense Urban Connectivity
This paper evaluates the downlink performance of 5G non-terrestrial networks (NTNs) realized via tethered unmanned aerial vehicle (TUAV)-mounted base stations, and compares it against conventional 5G …
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Securing Cooperative Sensing in UAV Swarms Against Conformity-Driven Byzantine Attacks
In integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) enabled 6G unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm networks, the widely adopted imitation-based conformity cooperation mechanism can be exploited by Byzantin…