NTSB CAROL · Event
Event CEN25LA347
Registry · N655D
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
BEECH C35
Year of manufacture
1951 · 74 years old at event
Engine
CONT MOTOR E185 SERIES (205 hp)
Seats / Engines
4 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
19560203
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A89F98
Registrant of record
KHALED ZAKY
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot’s fuel system mismanagement which resulted in a loss of engine power due to fuel starvation.
Factual narrative
The pilot reported the engine start, run-up, and takeoff were routine. About 35 minutes after takeoff, the pilot changed from the right to the left fuel tank. About 2 hours after taking off while in cruise flight at 6,500 ft mean sea level, the engine sputtered accompanied by a reduction in the fuel flow. The pilot activated the fuel boost pump with no effect on the fuel flow. He subsequently changed from the left fuel tank to the right fuel tank again with no effect and then returned the fuel selector to the left fuel tank. The propeller continued to windmill and further trouble shooting did not restore engine power so the pilot executed a forced landing to an open field populated with vegetation and sparse brush. The airframe sustained substantial damage to both wings and the fuselage. ADS-B data revealed the airplane departed at 1647:43 and ultimately climbed to a cruise altitude of about 6,500 ft msl. About 1853, the airplane entered a gradual descent which continued until the final data point consistent with a loss of engine power about that time. The final ADS-B data point was recorded at 1857:31. The altitude associated with that final data point was about 2,475 ft msl, which was about 50 ft above ground level. A postaccident examination did not reveal any evidence of a fuel leak or vegetation blight. The fuel caps were securely installed, and the fuel system appeared to be intact. About 8 gallons of fuel were recovered from the left tank and 3 gallons were recovered from the auxiliary tank. The right fuel tank was empty. The FAA inspector observed the fuel selector set to the left fuel tank when on scene after the accident. Postrecovery airframe fuel system and engine examinations did not reveal any anomalies consistent with a loss of engine power. According to the Pilot Operating Handbook, the engine was expected to burn about 9.7 gallons per hour (gph) and 11.2 gph at 65% and 75% engine power, respectively. The unusable fuel was 3 gallons in each main tank. The pilot stated that about 33 gallons of fuel were onboard at takeoff. Since about 11 gallons remained in the airplane at the time of the accident, the engine had burned about 22 gallons which was consistent with the flight time of 2 hours and 5 minutes from takeoff until the loss of engine power. In light of the lack of anomalies with respect to the engine and the fuel system, it is likely the pilot inadvertently ran the right fuel tank dry and was not able to reestablish fuel flow to the engine from the left fuel tank. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- — Aircraft-Fluids/misc hardware-Fluids-Fuel-Fluid management
- — Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Use of equip/system-Pilot
- — Personnel issues-Task performance-Planning/preparation-Fuel planning-Pilot
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2025_CEN25LA347.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, fuel starvation). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER)
Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗