NTSB CAROL · Event
Event DFW05LA029
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The failure to activate the hydraulic pump which resulted in the pilot's inability to maintain directional control.
Factual narrative
On December 4, 2004, approximately 1441 central standard time, a Convair 580 twin-engine airplane, N161FL, registered to and operated by IFL Group, Inc., of Waterford, Michigan, sustained substantial damage when it impacted terrain following a loss of directional control while landing at McAllen-Miller International Airport (MFE), near McAllen, Texas. The airline transport pilot (ATP), commercial pilot, and mechanic were not injured. Instrument meteorological conditions prevailed, and an IFR flight plan was filed for the local flight that was conducted under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. The maintenance flight originated from MFE approximately 1354. In a telephone interview with an NTSB representative, the 9,500-hour airline transport pilot stated that the left propeller had recently been worked on, so he was performing a post-maintenance test flight to verify the condition of the propeller. During the flight, the crew shut down the left engine and then restarted the engine. After the engine was restarted, the propeller was not operating properly, so the crew elected to secure the engine and return to the airport for a single-engine landing. The crew proceeded to execute the instrument landing system (ILS) approach to runway 13. After breaking through the overcast ceiling at 500 feet above the ground, the crew prepared for a full-stop landing on runway 13 ( 7,120- foot long, by 150- foot wide). Just prior to touch-down, the crew noticed that the alternator light was illuminated and the hydraulic pressure gauge indicated "0" pressure. The landing gear was already extended and the flaps were partially extended, and since they were on a single-engine approach, the crew elected to land the airplane. The pilot reported that upon touch-down, he immediately turned on the direct current (DC) hydraulic pump. He then realized he was unable to use steer the airplane due to the lack of nose wheel steering, and the wheel brakes were ineffective. The pilot was unable to maintain directional control and the airplane veered to the right and exited the runway. The airplane collided with the airport perimeter fence and continued down into a drainage ditch. There was no post-impact fire. The first officer submitted a written statement that described the same sequence of events. Examination of the airplane by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector, who responded to the accident site, revealed structural damage to the fuselage. Additionally, the leading edge of both wings exhibited large impact marks from the fence posts. The operator reported that following the accident, the airplane was examined by a company mechanic. No leaks were found, and there appeared to be a sufficient amount of normal hydraulic fluid in the system. The operator also reported that the DC hydraulic pump switch did not appear as if it had been turned on and added that the switch was underneath a switch guard that was in place. At 1353, the automated weather observing system at MFE reported wind from 350 degrees at five knots, five statute miles visibility, mist, overcast clouds at 500 feet, temperature 59 degrees Fahrenheit, dew point 57 degrees Fahrenheit, and an altimeter setting of 30.04 inches of Mercury. The 9,500-hour ATP-rated pilot was forced to secure the left engine during a maintenance test flight following the malfunction of the left propeller. The crew executed single-engine instrument landing system (ILS) approach to runway 13. During short final, the crew noticed that the alternator light was illuminated and the hydraulic pressure gauge indicated "0" pressure. The landing gear was already extended and the flaps were partially extended, so the crew elected to continue the approach to a full-stop landing. Upon landing, the pilot immediately turned on the direct current (DC) hydraulic pump. The pilot added that he then realized that he was unable to maintain directional control of the airplane due to the lack of nose wheel steering and the ineffective wheel brakes. As a result, the airplane continued to veer to the right and exited the runway. The airplane collided with the airport perimeter fence and continued down into a drainage ditch. The examination of the aircraft revealed that the hydraulic pump switch did not appear as if it had been turned on. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2004_DFW05LA029.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2011 · Conference Paper
Joint thunderstorm operations using the NASA F-106B and FAATC/AFWAL Convair 580 airplanes
During the 1985 thunderstorm season, three joint thunderstorm research flights were conducted within 100 n.mi. of NASA Langley by the NASA Storm Hazards F-106B and the FAA/USAF CV-580 research airplan…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Just Culture in Aviation: A Metaphorical Study on Aircraft Maintenance Students
Just Culture, a sub-dimension of safety culture, has been a prominent and debated topic in aviation safety in recent years.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗