NTSB CAROL · Event
Event ENG14IA016
Registry · N351CE
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
DOUGLAS C-118A
Year of manufacture
1954 · 60 years old at event
Engine
P & W R-2800 SERIES (2000 hp)
Seats / Engines
96 seats · 4 engines
Last airworthiness date
19890605
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A3E8BB
Registrant of record
EVERTS AIR FUEL INC
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The fatigue failure of the lower wing skin due to aging mechanisms. Contributing to the failure were lower wing skin inspection procedures insufficient to identify the crack.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHT
On February 24, 2014, about 1642 Alaska standard time, the crew of an Douglas C-118A airplane, N351CE, discovered a crack about 18 inches long in the left wing lower skin during a post-flight inspection after landing at Emmonak Airport (ENM), Emmonak, Alaska. The crack was located near wing station 175 inside the number 2 engine nacelle and extended from the forward edge of the skin panel at the forward spar, aft past stringer 19. A temporary repair was installed, and the airplane was ferried to Fairbanks for permanent repair. The airplane was registered to Tatonduk Outfitters, Ltd., dba Everts Air Cargo, and operated as a 14 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 121 Supplemental non-scheduled domestic cargo flight. The flight originated from Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport (PANC), Anchorage, Alaska, about 1450 Alaska standard time.
DAMAGE TO AIRPLANE
The flight crew noticed a steady stream of fuel from inside the number 2 nacelle during a post-flight inspection of the airplane. Maintenance personnel discovered the crack in the lower wing skin and noted no damage to the front spar, stringers, or other surrounding structure. Initially, the operator reported that a temporary repair would be affixed to the wing so that the airplane could be ferried to a maintenance base for further evaluation and repair. Several splice plates (doublers) were affixed to the lower wing skin and the airplane was ferried to Fairbanks, Alaska. After initial evaluation, the operator reported that the permanent repair would not remove the cracked wing skin pieces and the NTSB decided that an investigation would be impossible without the fractured wing skin. On May 29, 2014, the operator reported that a permanent repair would be accomplished on the airplane that would entail removing the cracked wing skin so the NTSB initiated an investigation. A section of lower left wing skin about 20 inches long by about 3 inches wide and containing the entire crack was removed from the airplane and shipped to the NTSB in June, 2014.
AIRCRAFT INFORMATION
The incident airplane, a Douglas C-118A, serial number 44599, was manufactured in 1954 and had accumulated 36,899.7 hours total time when the crack was found.
METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION
The crew reported that the flight was conducted under visual flight rules conditions with clear skies and more than 10 miles of visibility. During the flight they reported encountering one bump of moderate turbulence.
TESTS AND RESEARCH
The fractured piece of lower wing skin was examined at the NTSB Materials Laboratory in Washington, DC. The details of the examination can be found in the NTSB Materials Laboratory Factual Report contained in the public docket for this incident. The total fracture measured about 15.5 inches long and examination of the fracture faces revealed two regions exhibiting features consistent with pre-existing progressive cracking, with the remainder of the fracture exhibiting features consistent with overstress separation. The two progressive regions contained areas of fatigue cracking and areas of mixed mode fracture (fatigue with intermittent overstress regions). Fatigue cracking progressed forward and aft from the rivet hole location coincident with the forward flange of wing stringer 18 and both cracks initiated at the lower edge of the hole. Fatigue cracking also progressed forward and aft from the rivet hole location coincident with the aft flange of wing stringer 18 and both cracks initiated at the upper edge of the hole. There was no evidence of material defects at the four fatigue crack initiation points. The progressive crack forward of the stringer 18 forward hole progressed about 0.07 inch in stable fatigue and about 1.89 inches in mixed mode for a total length of about 1.96 inches. The progressive crack aft of the stringer 18 forward hole progressed about 0.25 inch in stable fatigue and about 0.72 inch in mixed mode for a total length of about 0.97 inch. The progressive crack forward of the stringer 18 aft hole progressed about 0.20 inch in stable fatigue and about 0.85 inch in mixed mode for a total length of about 1.05 inches. The progressive crack aft of the stringer 18 aft hole progressed about 0.03 inch in stable fatigue and about 0.11 inch in mixed mode for a total length of about 0.14 inch. The total length of progressive cracking was about 4.12 inches. The chemical composition, hardness and electrical conductivity of the wing skin were examined, and all were consistent with 7075-T6 aluminum alloy. It was noted that there were several areas of the fracture face that had a brown material consistent with sealant on them. The operator reported that the area of the fracture was covered with sealant before attaching the temporary repair doublers. Two additional small cracks were noted on the skin section submitted but were not opened and examined. One crack was located aft of the stringer 19 forward flange hole and the other was located between two holes near the stringer 18 location.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The location of the fracture on the incident airplane left lower wing skin was located near wing station 175, just inboard of the number 2 (left, inboard) nacelle, outboard nacelle attach angle. This area of the lower wing skin was only visible by looking up into the main landing gear wheel well. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airworthiness Directive (AD) 80-12-02R1 was originally effective in June 1980 and revised in January 1987 requiring radiographic (x-ray) inspection of the lower wing skins on all McDonnell Douglas DC-6, -6A, -6B, R6D, and C-118 airplanes. The AD required repetitive x-ray inspections of the left and right wing lower wing skins, stringer, and fittings between wing stations 60 to 130 and 167 to 185 from the front spar to the center spar every 1,000 flight hours. The operator performed the most recent AD x-ray inspection on the incident airplane on December 10, 2012, at an airframe total time of 36,288.0 hours, 611.7 hours prior to the incident. There were no discrepancies reported from this inspection. The original x-ray films were provided to the investigation for examination. Under close scrutiny, optimal lighting conditions, and with a known crack location the crack was evident on the x-ray films but was difficult to detect and was estimated to be 4 inches long at that time. The manufacturer reported that the minimum detectable crack size for this type of x-ray inspection is about 2 inches. Based on the condition and resolution of the x-ray films, the manufacturer reported that the crack was highly likely to be missed by the operator. Boeing Commercial Airplanes released Alert Service Bulletin (SB) DC6-57A001 on April 28, 2016, based on the findings from this investigation. The SB details revised inspection procedures for crack detection in the area around wing station 175. The SB calls for high frequency eddy current, low frequency eddy current, and radiographic (x-ray) inspection of the lower wing skin inside the inboard nacelles on all DC-6, -6A, -6B, C-118A, R6D-1, and R6D-1Z airplanes. The airplane suffered a crack in the left wing lower skin just inside the left inboard engine nacelle. The crack was discovered by the flight crew during a post flight inspection when they saw fuel streaming from the nacelle area. The incident airplane was manufactured in 1954 and had accrued almost 36,900 flight hours. Examination of the lower wing skin revealed a crack with a total length about 15.5 inches. Two separate regions of pre-exiting progressive fracture were found that totaled about 4.12 inches in length. Fatigue cracking initiated and progressed from two separate rivet holes where a stringer was attached to the wing skin. There were no material discrepancies or other anomalies noted at the fatigue initiation sites. The remainder of the fracture was due to overstress separation. The fractured area of lower wing skin was inspected by x-ray in accordance with an existing Airworthiness Directive 611.7 hours prior to the discovery of the crack. No discrepancies were reported from this inspection. Post incident examination of the x-ray films showed the crack was present but very difficult to detect without close scrutiny, optimal lighting and a known crack location. The manufacturer released a Service Bulletin based on the findings of the investigation to provide more detailed instructions and additional methods to detect cracking of the lower wing skin at the inboard nacelle area. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Aircraft-Aircraft structures-Wing structure-Plates/skins (on wing)-Fatigue/wear/corrosion - C
- F Organizational issues-Management-Policy/procedure-Adequacy of policy/proc-Manufacturer - F
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2014_ENG14IA016.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, turbulence, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER)
Political Turbulence and Aviation Safety: A Cross-National Analysis of Political Stability's Effects on Aviation Accidents
To what extent does political stability affect aviation safety? This research aims to link domestic political conditions and public safety through the consideration of aviation accident frequency.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Comparative Study on the Prediction of Aerodynamic Characteristics of Mini - Unmanned Aerial Vehicle with Turbulence Models
When dealing with CFD simulations the turbulent nature is seen on most of the engineering flows and these flows need to be solved.
- arXiv 2020 · arXiv preprint
Numerical Simulation of Iced Wing Using Separating Shear Layer Fixed Turbulence Models
Aerodynamic prediction of glaze ice accretion on airfoils and wing is studied using the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes method.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Prediction of stall and post-stall behavior of airfoils at low and high Reynolds numbers
An interactive boundary-layer method, together with the e(super n)-approach to the calculation of transition, has been used to predict the stall and post-stall behavior of airfoils at low and high Rey…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗