NTSB CAROL · Event
Event ERA11LA357
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The fatigue failure of the left main landing gear due to inadequate maintenance inspection that did not detect and correct corrosion pitting.
Factual narrative
On June 23, 2011, about 1130 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 182F, N3152U, was substantially damaged after a landing-gear collapse during taxi at Warrenton Airpark (7VG0), Warrenton, Virginia. The certificated airline transport pilot and 4 passengers were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the local skydiving flight, which was conducted under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. According to the pilot, as he taxied the airplane to the runway for takeoff, the left main landing gear collapsed, which resulted in substantial damage to the airplane. Examination revealed the left main landing gear had fractured, and completely separated from the airplane approximately six inches outboard of its attachment point at the airframe. According to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) records, the pilot, held an airline transport pilot certificate for airplane multiengine land. He also held a commercial pilot certificate for airplane single engine land. In addition, he held a flight instructor certificate, a ground instructor certificate and a flight engineer certificate. His most recent first-class medical certificate application was dated January 28, 2011, but it was denied. He reported 7,200 total hours of flight experience on that date. According to FAA records, an airworthiness certificate was issued for the airplane in 1962. It was a four-seat, high-wing, fixed conventional gear airplane that was equipped with a Continental O-470 engine. The most recent annual inspection was completed November 26, 2010, at 2,679 total aircraft hours. At the time of the accident the airplane accumulated approximately 2,724.6 total flight hours. A National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) materials specialist subsequently examined the left main landing gear segments in the operator’s hangar. His preliminary examination revealed that the fracture surface on the separated landing gear leg was smeared during the accident sequence. The segment that remained attached to the airframe displayed a “pristine” fracture, which revealed features consistent with fatigue failure. A detailed examination at the NTSB Materials Laboratory, Washington, DC, confirmed the failure due to fatigue. Examination of the underside of the landing gear strut in an area directly adjacent to the fatigue zone, revealed multiple corrosion pits. The Cessna Maintenance Manual (Model 100 Series (1963-68) Section 2 Ground Handling, Servicing, Lubrication and Inspection) included criteria to visually inspect the “Main gear wheels, wheel bearings, step and spring strut, tires, and fairings” every 100 hours. In July 2007, “Section 5 Landing Gear” of the maintenance manual was revised and included information that concerned “Corrosion Control on Landing Gear Springs." Additionally, the Cessna continued airworthiness program included criteria “To inspect main landing gear spring outboard support for corrosion” every 1,000 hours or 3 years. According to the pilot, as he taxied the airplane to the runway for takeoff, the left main landing gear collapsed. Examination revealed that the left main landing gear had fractured and completely separated from the airplane about 6 inches outboard of its attachment point at the airframe. Examination of the fracture surface on the section of landing gear leg that remained attached to the airframe revealed features consistent with fatigue failure. Examination of the underside of the landing gear leg in an area directly adjacent to the fatigue zone revealed multiple corrosion pits. The manufacturer's maintenance guidance called for visual inspection of the landing gear every 100 hours, and the maintenance manual included information specific to corrosion control on the landing gear legs. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Main landing gear-Failure - C
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Maintenance-Scheduled/routine maintenance-Maintenance personnel - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Main landing gear-Fatigue/wear/corrosion - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2011_ERA11LA357.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Faculty research project
Reconfigurable Guidance and Control Systems for Emerging On-Orbit Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing (OSAM) Space Vehicles
Dynamic response to emergent situations is a necessity in the on-orbit servicing, assembly, and manufacturing (OSAM) field, because traditional on-orbit guidance and control (G&C) cannot respond effic…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2019 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Satellite Maintenance: An Opportunity to Minimize the Kessler Effect
Recently, there has been an emphasis on the growing problem of orbital debris. While the advantages of placing satellites into space are numerous, advances in satellite technology combined with the gr…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2015 · Conference paper
The Implementation of Safety Management Systems in Maintenance Operations
Literature for Safety Management Systems (SMS) that apply to flight operations is abundant, but there is a limited supply of SMS-related literature for maintenance operations.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR)
Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint
Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗