ERA20LA035
2019-11-09 · Griffin, Georgia, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport 6A2
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot’s failure to ensure that the airplane was properly configured for takeoff, which resulted in the inadvertent retraction of the landing gear during the takeoff roll and the airplane’s subsequent runway excursion.
Factual narrative
On November 9, 2019, at 1024 eastern daylight time, a Beech BE55, N686DR, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Griffin, Georgia. The commercial pilot and four passengers were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot reported that he was giving rides in his airplane, and the accident flight was the fifth flight of the morning. After the passengers boarded, the pilot taxied to runway 14 and completed the before takeoff checklist, then applied full power for takeoff. He reported that everything appeared normal during the takeoff roll, but, as the airplane approached 70 knots, about one third of the way down the runway, the landing gear suddenly retracted, and the airplane skidded off the right side of the runway before coming to rest partially on the grass and runway pavement. Following the accident, the pilot noticed that the landing gear handle was in the up position; he reported that it may have been accidentally bumped by one of the passengers as they got into the airplane. Examination of the airplane by a Federal Aviation Administration inspector revealed that the airplane sustained substantial damage to the underside of the fuselage. A subsequent follow-up examination of the airplane and landing gear system revealed that the gear handle operated normally, and the landing gear functioned as designed. No anomalies were discovered with the system that would preclude normal landing gear operation. Maintenance was performed on the landing gear handle on January 19, 2018, at an airframe total time of 3,896 hours; the landing gear control handle was loose due to a selector handle spring retainer irregularity. The landing gear handle was repaired, and functionality was verified. There were no additional maintenance irregularities noted with the system during subsequent maintenance and the pilot reported no issues with the landing gear since the maintenance was performed 22 months before the accident. The airplane’s "initial" checklist included a line item stating "gear lever – down." According to the airplane flight manual landing gear systems description, the airplane was equipped with a safety switch to prevent inadvertent retraction of the landing gear on the ground; a main strut safety switch opens the control circuit when the strut is compressed. A caution note stated, “Never rely on the safety switch to keep the gear down during taxi or on takeoff, landing roll, or in a static position. Always make certain that the landing gear switch is in the down position during these operations.” The pilot reported that he was giving rides in his airplane and the accident flight was the fifth flight of the morning. After the passengers boarded, the pilot taxied to the runway and completed the before takeoff checklist, then applied full power for takeoff. He reported that everything appeared normal during the takeoff roll, but, as the airplane approached 70 knots, about one third of the way down the runway, the landing gear suddenly retracted and the airplane skidded off the right side of the runway before coming to rest partially on the grass and runway pavement. Postaccident examination of the airplane and landing gear system found that the gear handle operated normally, and the landing gear functioned as designed. No anomalies were discovered with the system that would preclude normal operation. Following the accident, the pilot noticed that the landing gear handle was in the up, or retracted, position. It is likely that, at some point while on the ground, the landing gear handle was inadvertently moved to the retracted position, possibly by one of the numerous passengers during exit or entry. During the takeoff roll, once the airplane started to gain lift, the weight on the wheels was reduced to a point that allowed for the landing gear retraction system to activate, which resulted in the landing gear retracting at an airspeed at which the airplane was unable to become airborne. The airplane’s initial checklist included a line item to check that the landing gear lever was down. The pilot did not observe that the landing gear lever position was in the retracted position prior to takeoff. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Info processing/decision-Identification/recognition-Pilot
- — Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Landing gear selector-Unintentional use/operation
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2019_ERA20LA035.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (runway excursion, maintenance). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2013 · Conference Paper Cockpit Resource Management (CRM) training in the 1550th combat crew training wing
The training program the 1550th Combat Crew Training Wing at Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico, implemented in September 1985 is discussed.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- SKYbrary (Eurocontrol) 2024 · SKYbrary article Runway Excursion — SKYbrary Knowledge Base
SKYbrary runway excursion review — RE-OE (overruns) + RE-LO (lateral). Risk drivers: long landing, high approach speed, contaminated surface, tailwind, mis-set autobrakes.