Skip to content

Atlas / NTSB / ERA22LA307

NTSB CAROL · Event

Event ERA22LA307

2022-07-10 Cragsmoor, New York, United States Airport · N89 None 1 aircraft Status: Completed

Registry · N600FS

FAA Aircraft Registry record.

Make / Model

MOONEY M20F

Year of manufacture

1974 · 48 years old at event

Engine

LYCOMING I0360 SER (180 hp)

Seats / Engines

4 seats · 1 engine

Last airworthiness date

19740822

ADS-B equipped

Yes — Mode-S A7C7CD

Registrant of record

HOME FREE AVIATION LLC

Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).

Aircraft involved

Probable cause & findings

The pilot’s decision to continue toward rising terrain despite observing the airplane’s decreased climb performance after takeoff, which resulted in flight into terrain.

Factual narrative

On July 10, 2022, about 1917 eastern daylight time, a Mooney M20F, N600FS, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Cragsmoor, New York. The pilot was not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight.   The flight originated at Joseph Y Resnick Airport (N89), Ellenville, New York, and was destined for Brookhaven Airport (HWV), Shirley, New York.   The pilot reported that he departed N89 with the airplane’s fuel tanks full and proceeded along a route recommended by local pilots to clear the surrounding terrain. The pilot noted that the airplane’s climb performance was “less than normal” and that the airplane was “struggling” to maintain a climb rate of 500 ft per minute. As the airplane approached terrain, the pilot considered a “hard turn,” but was concerned about losing airspeed and the proximity of the terrain and chose to continue at the airplane’s best rate of climb. The airplane subsequently began to scrape across trees in a level attitude, then settled into the trees and impacted terrain. The airplane came to rest in heavily-wooded terrain at an elevation about 2,230 ft msl about 3 statute miles southeast of N89. Both wings sustained substantial damage. The airplane was recovered from the site for additional examination. The pilot reported that he departed with the airplane’s fuel tanks full and proceeded along a route recommended by local pilots to clear the surrounding terrain. The pilot noted that the airplane’s climb performance was “less than normal” and that the airplane was “struggling” to maintain a climb rate of 500 ft per minute. As the airplane approached terrain, the pilot considered a “hard turn,” but was concerned about losing airspeed and the proximity of the terrain and chose to continue at the airplane’s best rate of climb. The airplane subsequently began to scrape across trees in a level attitude, then settled into the trees. The airplane came to rest in heavily-wooded terrain at an elevation about 2,230 ft mean sea level (msl) southeast of the departure airport. Examination of the engine revealed that the induction air boot from the airbox to the fuel injector unit was severely degraded. No other anomalies were observed that would have precluded normal operation. Performance information from the airplane’s pilot operating handbook indicated that the expected rate of climb given the airplane’s gross weight and the atmospheric conditions present at the time of the accident was about 1,300 ft per minute at a best rate of climb speed of 113 mph indicated airspeed. Based on this information, the airplane would travel a horizontal distance of about 2.8 statute miles (sm) to reach an altitude of 2,500 ft msl. The accident site was located about 3 sm straight-line distance from the departure airport. The departure airport was located in a valley adjacent to a ridgeline that ran northeast/southwest. Another airport was located in the valley about 9 nautical miles south of the departure airport. Review of the sectional chart revealed that the accident site was located just north of a peak with a charted elevation of 2,289 ft msl, the highest terrain in the immediate vicinity of the departure airport. It is possible that the condition of the fuel injector airbox boot could have affected airflow over the fuel injector impact tubes and the performance of the fuel injectors. Although this effect could not be quantified based on the available information, it may have contributed to the pilot’s perception of decreased climb performance. If the pilot had concerns about the airplane’s climb performance after takeoff, the options available included returning to the departure airport, continuing south along the valley and gaining altitude before turning on course, or diverting to the airport to the south. However, the available evidence suggests that, after takeoff, the pilot turned the airplane toward the destination airport and the area of highest terrain surrounding the departure airport, where the airplane subsequently impacted trees and rising terrain. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12

NTSB Findings

Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).

  • Personnel issues-Action/decision-Action-Incorrect action performance-Pilot
  • Environmental issues-Physical environment-Terrain-Mountainous/hilly terrain-Decision related to condition
  • Personnel issues-Action/decision-Info processing/decision-Decision making/judgment-Pilot
  • Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Power plant-Air intake-Damaged/degraded

Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file NTSB_2022_ERA22LA307.txt. Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb. Full investigation docket on data.ntsb.gov ↗.