NTSB CAROL · Event
Event FTW98FA364
Registry · N251GL
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
RAPIDFLIGHT HOLDINGS LLC M2 GLIDER
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A25BD6
Registrant of record
RAPIDFLIGHT HOLDINGS LLC
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
Debonding of the propeller erosion shield due to an improper overhaul and repair by other maintenance personnel.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHT
On August 19, 1998, at 1715 mountain daylight time, a Beech 1900D, N251ZV, owned by Mesa Airlines, Inc., of Farmington, New Mexico, and operated by Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd., of Spencer, Iowa, as United Express flight 1605, was substantially damaged when the erosion shield separated from one of the left propeller blades and punctured the pressure vessel during initial climb at Denver, Colorado. There were no injuries to the airline transport-rated captain, commercial certificated first officer, and 12 passengers, but one passenger sustained a minor injury. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and an IFR flight plan had been filed for the scheduled domestic passenger flight operating under Title 14 CFR Part 135. The airplane taxied from its gate at 1710, and took off from runway 17R at 1714. The following was contained in the captain's discrepancy report: "Reaching 500 feet agl [above ground level] after takeoff, heard loud 'bang.' Slight vibration from left prop. Returned for landing. Discovered hole in fuselage from prop leading edge strip." The airplane returned to Denver and landed on runway 17L at 1719 and arrived at its gate at 1725. Postaccident examination revealed the entire erosion shield was missing. There were three holes punctured in the fuselage. The first hole was about 12 inches aft of the airstair door and just above the cabin window. The second hole was slightly higher than the first. The third hole was at the top of the fuselage. A portion of the erosion shield entered the cabin and knocked out the overhead passenger service unit at seat 1A. Two small dents were found in the ceiling. The inner window pane at seat 2C was punctured and a piece of the erosion shield was found lodged between the inner and outer panes. Another piece was found between the ceiling and the pressure vessel. The passenger seated in row 2C sustained a small cut on his forehead when he was grazed by a piece of the shrapnel. He refused medical treatment.
AIRCRAFT INFORMATION
N251ZV (s.n. UE-251), a Beech 1900D, was manufactured by the Raytheon Aircraft Corporation in 1996. It was equipped with two Pratt and Whitney PT6A-67D engines, driving two Hartzell HC-E4A-31 composite propellers. The propeller blades are made of Kevlar, fiberglass, foam and epoxy. A metallic erosion shield is bonded to the leading edge of the propeller blades, and de-icing boots are bonded to the inboard end of the erosion shield and propeller blade body. According to the aircraft maintenance records, the four propeller blades were last overhauled and repaired by Aircraft Propeller Service, Inc., in July 1998.
TESTS AND RESEARCH
The four composite blades from the left propeller were removed from the airplane and sent to NTSB's Materials Laboratory in Washington, D.C., where, on August 27, 1998, they were examined. According to the Materials Laboratory's Factual Report (No. 99-23, attached), the surface of the damaged blade (s.n. 811) was smooth and shiny, "consistent with adhesive disbonding (debond) on about 80% of the total bond area...The remaining outboard separation area had a much rougher powdery white appearance typical on cohesive separation within the bonding material." The report further stated that the propeller blade (s.n. 811) had been repaired by injecting adhesive into the joint. This repair reportedly occurred approximately 300 hours before. The repaired area was readily apparent during the examination because it contained numerous voids, air bubbles, dirt and debris. Evidence of chaffing (rubbing) was found at several locations in the debonded area, indicative of movement between the debonded erosion shield and the propeller blade body. The other three blades (1802, 808, and 806) appeared to be undamaged when visually inspected, but tap tests indicated approximately 80 to 90% debonding of the erosion shield under the deice boots on blades 1802 and 808. Blade 806 had "spotty" debonding. When the deice boots were removed, the erosion shields on blades 808 and 806 were found to be cracked. Samples of the erosion shield adhesive were removed and forwarded to the manufacturer for analysis. Using differential scanning calorimetery (DSC), the samples were found to be "fully cured," and contained no "environmental contaminants" such as water or solvents. Further tests of the adhesive, Hysol EA 9330, showed that the cured mixture contained approximately 120 to 140% (by weight) of the recommended amount of part B of the epoxy. A mixing ratio of 100:33 of part A (hardening components) to part B (catalyzers) is recommended by the data sheet. In a report prepared for Hartzell Propellers by the University of Dayton Research Institute, it was found that decreased bond strength would result if Hysol EA 9330 was improperly mixed (such as a 20 to 40% excess of part B). Oil and dirt contamination detected on the blade surfaces would also reduce bonding strength of the joint. However, it could not be determined if the contamination was introduced before or after the erosion shield debonded. Finally, the report noted that exposure to high temperatures could cause a separation.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The airplane was released to Great Lakes Aviation for repairs on August 20, 1998. After being examined at NTSB's laboratory, the composite blades from the left propeller were sent to Hartzell Propellers. Hartzell Propellers then sent four new replacement propeller blades to Great Lakes Aviation on September 1, 1998. In addition to the Federal Aviation Administration, parties to the investigation included the Raytheon Aircraft Corporation, Great Lakes Aviation, Hartzell Propellers, and Aircraft Propeller Service, Inc. Shortly after the airplane took off, the crew heard a loud noise and felt a slight vibration from the left propeller. They returned and landed. It was discovered that the propeller erosion shield had debonded and a portion had penetrated the passenger cabin just aft of the airstair door, knocked ajar Seat 1A Passenger Service Unit, ricocheted off the ceiling, and penetrated the inner window pane at Seat 2C. Laboratory examination of the propeller blade revealed an area 'consistent with adhesive disbonding (debond) on about 80% of the total bond area...' Three hundred hours before the accident, the blade had been overhauled and repaired. The repaired area contained numerous voids, air bubbles, dirt and debris. Evidence of chaffing (rubbing) was found at several locations in the debonded area, indicative of movement between the debonded erosion shield and the propeller blade body. Samples of the erosion shield adhesive were tested and found to have been mixed in improper proportions, reducing bond strength. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1998_FTW98FA364.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Faculty research project
Reconfigurable Guidance and Control Systems for Emerging On-Orbit Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing (OSAM) Space Vehicles
Dynamic response to emergent situations is a necessity in the on-orbit servicing, assembly, and manufacturing (OSAM) field, because traditional on-orbit guidance and control (G&C) cannot respond effic…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2019 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Satellite Maintenance: An Opportunity to Minimize the Kessler Effect
Recently, there has been an emphasis on the growing problem of orbital debris. While the advantages of placing satellites into space are numerous, advances in satellite technology combined with the gr…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2015 · Conference paper
The Implementation of Safety Management Systems in Maintenance Operations
Literature for Safety Management Systems (SMS) that apply to flight operations is abundant, but there is a limited supply of SMS-related literature for maintenance operations.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR)
Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint
Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗