NTSB CAROL · Event
Event LAX01LA181
Registry · N2479S
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
SIX CHUTER SR7 XL
Year of manufacture
2000 · 1 years old at event
Engine
ROTAX 582SER (65 hp)
Seats / Engines
2 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
20071212
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A24DA4
Registrant of record
CARLSON JAMES M
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A dual loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
Factual narrative
On May 18, 2001, at 0816 Hawaiian standard time, a Cessna 337C, N2479S (Mokulele 3), experienced a loss of engine power in both engines and ditched in the ocean off the coast of Paauilo, Hilo, Hawaii. Mokulele Flight Service, Inc., owned and operated the airplane under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 135 as an on-demand air taxi flight. The tour flight, Circle Island Flight, was a counter clockwise tour around the big island. The commercial pilot and five passengers were not injured. The airplane sank in deep water, 150 feet, and presumed to be destroyed. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the local area sightseeing flight, and a company visual flight rules (VFR) flight plan had been filed. The flight departed the Kona International Airport, Keahole (KOA), Kailua/Kona, Hawaii, at 0700. The flight was scheduled to terminate at KOA. According to Hilo Air Traffic Control (ATC) personnel, radar services were terminated with the accident airplane about 0806 after the airplane had transitioned through the Hilo terminal area. The pilot was instructed to squawk VFR and a frequency change was approved. The pilot switched to a UNICOM frequency. At 0814, a company pilot reported to Hilo ATC that he had heard a mayday call on the UNICOM frequency. He indicated that a company airplane had crashed into the water abeam Paauilo. In the pilot's written statement, he indicated that he conducted a preflight inspection of the airplane that included a weather check, weight and balance, and inspection of the airplane. Once everyone boarded the airplane, he conducted engine run-ups with all gages, including the fuel gages indicating normal. The flight departed on the main fuel tanks, and were kept in that position throughout the duration of the flight. Near Paauilo, both engines started to fluctuate with a gradual power reduction. The pilot started the emergency procedures, advanced the mixtures, propellers, and throttles. He expected that one of the engines would have a greater surge, but that was not the case. He reported that the front engine was "going in and out of power." He checked the fuel pressure gages and saw that both needles indicated zero. He turned on both fuel boost pumps and checked that the magnetos were on both. There was no response. He then made several unsuccessful attempts to get a "fuel flow response" by switching both sets of fuel selectors to "various settings." Once the pilot was unable to deduce the nature of the problem, he realized that they were losing altitude. He turned his attention to his passengers and briefed them again on the emergency procedure for an ocean ditching. He reached over and opened the emergency exit door, made a mayday call, and then landed straight ahead. He felt the safest place to land was the ocean due to the calm and smooth conditions. The pilot stated that the airplane bounced twice before the final impact. The front windscreen collapsed on the final impact and the cockpit started to fill with water. The pilot exited through the front of the airplane. When he surfaced he saw that two passengers were at the surface inflating their life vests. The pilot swam to the right front of the airplane where he saw a third passenger surface. He then dove to the door, which was submerged, to assist the last passenger who was still in the airplane. The airplane was starting to sink, and he was unable to reach the passenger. The pilot resurfaced, and then saw the last passenger surface. A tour helicopter circled the area and dropped life preservers. Personnel from county rescue services had everyone out of the water and to the nearest hospital 15 minutes after the accident. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspectors interviewed the pilot and passengers. The pilot and passengers reported that both engines quit at the same time. The pilot told the FAA that he did not visually verify the fuel quantity; instead he utilized the fuel gages as a reference for fuel quantity. The pilot further reported that he believed there were several gallons of fuel in the auxiliary tanks. When the engines quit, he switched to the auxiliary tanks, with no change in the loss of engine power. The FAA inspectors also interviewed the owner, refueler, and director of maintenance of the company. The airplane was refueled the previous night with 44 gallons of fuel. When the refueler visually checked the fuel level, he stated that the fluid was just below the top, about 1 inch, which should have been 75 gallons. There were no unresolved mechanical anomalies with the airplane prior to the accident flight. During cruise, both engines lost power, and the pilot ditched the airplane in the ocean, where it sank off the coastline in 150 feet of water. The purpose of the flight was a tour of the Island of Hawaii. An hour into the flight, after transitioning through Hilo's airspace, the pilot noted fluctuations in both engines with a continued gradual loss of power. He conducted emergency procedures, which included advancing the mixtures, throttles, and propellers, with no change. He also switched to the auxiliary tanks, with the same results, both engines continued to lose power and eventually quit. The pilot briefed the passengers on ditching procedures, opened the emergency exit door, and landed straight ahead. He decided to land in the ocean due to calm and smooth ocean conditions. The pilot and passengers extricated themselves out of the airplane after ditching. There were no unresolved mechanical anomalies with the airplane prior to the accident flight. It had been refueled the night before with 44 gallons of fuel. The estimated fuel on board the airplane prior to departure was 75 gallons. Passengers confirmed that both engines quit. The airplane was not recovered. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2001_LAX01LA181.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Just Culture in Aviation: A Metaphorical Study on Aircraft Maintenance Students
Just Culture, a sub-dimension of safety culture, has been a prominent and debated topic in aviation safety in recent years.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Performance PRISM: A Comprehensive Framework For Performance Measurement In Aircraft Maintenance
Aircraft maintenance is governed by rigorous safety requirements and high operational complexity, demanding robust performance measurement frameworks to ensure optimal maintenance practices.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗