NTSB CAROL · Event
Event LAX97LA277
Registry · N8139M
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
CESSNA 310I
Year of manufacture
1964 · 33 years old at event
Engine
CONT MOTOR I0-470 SERIES (260 hp)
Seats / Engines
6 seats · 2 engines
Last airworthiness date
19640702
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S AB1820
Registrant of record
ACME RACING LLC
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
inadequate maintenance inspection of the landing gear system, following a prior incident, due to the mechanic's failure to follow the service manual instructions.
Factual narrative
On August 9, 1997, at 1230 hours mountain standard time, a Cessna 310, N8139M, sustained a right main landing gear collapse during the landing touchdown on runway 22 at the Mesa, Arizona, airport. The aircraft sustained substantial damage. The airline transport rated pilot and the commercial pilot were not injured. The aircraft was being operated as a training flight under 14 CFR Part 91 by Aex Air Inc., of Tempe, Arizona, when the accident occurred. The flight originated at Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport at 0835. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed. According to written statements from both pilots, the training flight lasted about 3 hours, included several landings, and was returning to Phoenix. On the final approach to land at Phoenix, the pilot put the gear selector down and obtained a green light indication. During main gear touchdown the gear warning horn sounded and the pilot performed a successful go-around. The pilots elected to leave the landing gear down during the climb out and then proceeded to a safe location to assess the problem. During this portion of the flight, the green down light went out. Subsequent attempts, to include both the normal and emergency procedures in the POH, to obtain a green down light on the landing gear were unsuccessful. The pilots landed at Mesa and the right main landing gear collapsed. Postaccident examination of the aircraft revealed that the right main gear upper side link had fractured, separating it from the lower side link. The associated push-pull tube for the upper side link was bent and the attaching bolt sheared. The upper and lower side links form the down lock for the main landing gear. The right main landing gear components were sent to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Wichita Aircraft Certification Office. A certification engineer from that office then took the components to Cessna Aircraft metallurgical laboratories for examination under supervision. According to a report of the examination, the components met the chemical, hardness, and process specifications listed in the production drawings. The report noted that all fractures and bends were the result of overloads. A complete report of the findings is appended to this report. On May 28, 1997, this aircraft sustained damage while it was parked on the ramp at the Burbank, California, airport. The event occurred while a Boeing 727 was departing the ramp. According to witnesses, as the 727 turned, it's jet blast lifted the Cessna off the ground and actually pulled one lineman into the air before the aircraft was abruptly deposited back on the ramp. Damage was noted to the rudder and one flap. Following the incident, the aircraft was ferried to Chino, California, for repair. The Safety Board obtained a copy of the invoice and estimate for repairs to the damaged aircraft. In a letter to the operator dated June 1, 1997, Aircraftsman submitted an estimate which included as item 10, "jack aircraft and inspect nose gear assembly, actuator and bellcrank and nose structure," and item 11, "perform gear retraction and extension check." Despite numerous attempts by the operator, the FAA, and the Safety Board, no work orders or job cards were located at the maintenance facility to document the maintenance items that were performed during the June 1-2 shop visit. The Safety Board discussed this accident with the Cessna Aircraft Company Product Safety Department. According to the manufacturer, it is possible to perform a gear retraction and extension check, which operates normally, without discovering any damage to the gear. Furthermore, the gear can operate normally for an unknown period of time, then at a later date, fail to operate properly. The manufacturer also stated that following the incident at Burbank the airplane should have undergone an extensive re-rigging of the gear, which would have also included tension check on the down lock of between 40 and 60 pounds. If the tension was not somewhere in this range, the 310 Service Manual calls for re-rigging as necessary to prevent collapse of the gear. The aircraft parts which had been retained for laboratory testing were returned to the operator of the aircraft on January 28, 1998. After a 3 hr training flight, the pilot put the gear selector down & obtained a green light indication. During main gear touchdown, the gear warning horn sounded, & the pilot performed a successful go-around. Subsequent attempts (using both the normal & emergency procedures to obtain a green down light for the landing gear) were unsuccessful. The right main landing gear collapsed during the final landing. Postaccident exam of the aircraft revealed that the right main gear upper side link had fractured, separating it from the lower side link. The associated push-pull tube for the upper side link was bent, and the attaching bolt was sheared. Metallurgical exam of the parts disclosed that all fractures & bends were the result of overload. This aircraft had sustained damage, while parked at another airport ramp. This occurred as a Boeing 727 was departing the ramp. Its jet blast lifted the Cessna off the ground, then it was abruptly deposited back on the ramp. Following the incident, the aircraft was ferried to a repair facility. Records of the repair showed that the gear work was limited to jacking the aircraft & inspecting the nose gear assembly, actuator and bellcrank, and nose structure. A gear retraction and extension check was also performed. The manufacturer stated that following the jet blast incident, the airplane should have undergone an extensive re-rigging of the gear to thoroughly inspect the system. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1997_LAX97LA277.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper
A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗