NTSB CAROL · Event
Event LAX99LA227
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A preexisting fatigue fracture of the right axle.
Factual narrative
On June 24, 1999, at 1808 hours Pacific daylight time, a Cessna 120, N2651N, ground looped and collapsed the right landing gear during a touch-and-go landing at the Chino, California, airport. The airplane, owned and operated by the student pilot under 14 CFR Part 91, sustained substantial damage. The pilot was not injured during the local area solo instructional flight. Visual meteorological conditions existed for the flight and no flight plan was filed. The flight had originated at the Chino airport at 1730. The pilot stated that on the landing rollout the airplane veered to the left. He applied right rudder, which did not correct the travel to the left. He engaged the right brake, which did not have an effect on the airplane's movement to the left. The pilot reported that he was unable to perform a go-around due to the airplane's direction of travel. He kept the airplane on the asphalt, with the wings level, and applied the brakes to stop the airplane. He stated that the airplane "executed a moderate 180 [degree] turn," and the right wheel broke free. The right landing gear spar dug into the asphalt and broke free, the airplane made a turn to the right and the right wing struck the ground. A Safety Board investigator examined the right main landing gear and noted the appearance of a crack in the right axle. The axle was sent to the Safety Board's metallurgical laboratory for examination. The examination revealed that the fracture was through the barrel near the mounting flange. A microscopic examination of the fracture faces showed a discolored crescent-shaped area consistent with a preexisting crack. A stereo microscopic examination revealed that the crescent region had fracture features typical of multiple origin fatigue cracking. The scanning electron microscope examinations on the mounting flange fracture revealed optical observations of fatigue and overstress. The examination revealed fatigue striations and ductile dimples respectively. It was also noted that a crack existed diametrically opposite of the fatigue crescent. It was also examined and found to have characteristics similar to the original fracture crescent. On the landing rollout the airplane veered to the left. An attempt was made to correct the travel to the left; however, a turn was initiated and the right wheel broke free. The right landing gear axle dug into the ground, and the airplane ground looped after the right wing tip struck the runway. The right axle was examined and found to have preexisting multiple-origin fatigue fractures. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1999_LAX99LA227.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper
A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research)
Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace)
Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗