NTSB CAROL · Event
Event MIA06TA093
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The loss of engine power in both engines for an unknown reason.
Factual narrative
On April 18, 2006, about 0908 Atlantic standard time, a Piper PA-31-310, N554DJ, registered to and operated by the Department of Justice of the United States Virgin Islands, as a public-use flight, ditched in the Caribbean Sea while on approach to land at the Cyril E. King Airport, Charlotte Amalie, Saint Thomas, United States Virgin Islands. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and a company flight plan was filed. The commercial pilot and six passengers reported minor injuries. The airplane sank and has not been recovered; it is presumed destroyed. The flight originated from the Henry E. Rohlsen Airport, Christiansted, Saint Croix, United States Virgin Islands, about 0850. The pilot reported that this was a routine flight conducted every Tuesday for the purpose of transporting residents of a correctional facility on Saint Croix to Saint Thomas for court hearings. The airplane was based on Saint Thomas. The week prior to the accident, the airplane was not flown due to the Easter holiday. The pilot stated that the airplane was parked outside, and there had been a significant amount of rain during the week. About 0830, the pilot preflighted the airplane for a positioning flight from Saint Thomas to Saint Croix. The only abnormality he encountered was an excessive amount of water in the left outboard fuel tank when he drained that tank. He also noted some water when he drained the cross feed; however, that was not abnormal. The outboard fuel tanks each contained about 1/4 tank of fuel, and the inboard fuel tanks each contained about 1/2 tank of fuel. After completing the preflight, he again drained the left outboard fuel tank to insure that all water was drained. The pilot then boarded the airplane and flew to Saint Croix. The flight was unremarkable. He did not shut down the engines during the boarding of the six passengers in Saint Croix. The takeoff and cruise portions of the return flight to Saint Thomas were unremarkable. The pilot stated that during his descent toward the airport, at an indicated altitude of about 1,400 feet, the left engine started to surge. He immediately turned on the electrical fuel boost pumps and moved all of the engine control levers forward. He reduced the descent rate of the airplane from about 600 feet per minute to about 300 feet per minute and maintained an airspeed of 90 knots. About 30 seconds from the time the left engine started surging, the right engine started to surge. He advised the controller in the airport tower of the situation. He instructed the passengers to prepare for a ditching. Both fuel selectors were positioned to the inboard tanks. He switched positions on the fuel tank selectors to the outboard tank position for each engine. The problem did not correct itself. This process was done several times in an attempt to correct the surging. He did not select the cross feed position. He noted the altimeter was indicating 400 feet. He focused on the airspeed so as not to stall and flew the airplane into the water with both engines still surging. The airplane stayed afloat as he and the passengers exited, and then it sank. The pilot stated that his standard operating procedure was to use the inboard fuel tanks for takeoff and landing, and upon reaching cruise altitude, switch to the outboard tanks. When he began his descent, he switched back to the inboard fuel tanks. A flight between the two islands took about 14 to 17 minutes with a cruising altitude of 3,000 feet. The airplane burned about 17.5 gallons of fuel per engine per hour, for a total of about 35 gallons per hour. He did his flight planning based on a fuel burn rate of 40 gallons per hour. The airplane was making a public use flight between two islands for the purpose of transporting residents of a correctional facility to court hearings. During descent to the destination airport, at an altitude of approximately 1,400 feet, both engines started surging. The pilot's attempts to restore normal engine power were unsuccessful, and he ditched the airplane in ocean water with both engines still surging. The airplane stayed afloat as he and the passengers exited, and then it sank. The airplane was not recovered from the ocean, precluding its examination and determination of the reason for the dual loss of engine power. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2006_MIA06TA093.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER)
Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗