NTSB CAROL · Event
Event MIA98LA232
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The dual-student's attempt to perform a go-around after a reported loss of power in the left engine during landing flare and his failure to relinquish the controls to the instructor when control was lost during the go-around resulting in the aircraft rolling uncontrollably to the left and colliding with the ground left wing first.
Factual narrative
On August 31, 1998, about 1153 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-34-200, N15541, registered to Nurnberg Family Enterprises, Inc., crashed while on approach to land at Daytona Beach International Airport, Daytona Beach, Florida, while on a Title 14 CFR Part 91 instructional flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time and no flight plan was filed. The aircraft received substantial damage and the commercial-rated flight instructor and private-rated dual student received minor injuries. The flight originated from Daytona Beach, the same day, about 1035. The flight instructor stated that the dual-student flew a normal approach to runway 7 left. During the landing flare, the left engine quit. The dual-student did not recognize the left yaw caused by the failed left engine and initiated a go-around by applying full power on the operative engine and rotating the nose to a climb attitude. The aircraft began to roll to the left and the instructor attempted to gain control of the aircraft from the dual-student, who was frozen on the controls. The instructor placed the left propeller in the feathered position and attempted to perform a single engine go-around. The dual-student finally let go of the controls and as the instructor was attempting to reduce engine power and make a forced landing in the grass adjacent to the runway, the left wing struck the ground and the aircraft spun around, coming to rest. The dual-student stated he performed a normal approach to runway 7 left. As he flared for landing, the aircraft ballooned. He applied power to increase airspeed because the aircraft was below Vmc speed. He noticed the aircraft was yawing to the left, which his instructor took as a sign that the left engine had failed. The instructor placed the left propeller in the feathered position and attempted to regain control of the aircraft. The aircraft hit the ground with the left wing and spun around, coming to rest. Postcrash examination of the aircraft's fuel system and left engine controls showed no evidence of mechanical failure or malfunction. The left engine and propeller were removed from the aircraft and mounted on an engine test stand. The propeller was in the feathered position. The engine was started and operated to full power with no evidence of mechanical failure or malfunction. The engine-driven fuel pump was found to have a small leak in the diaphragm, which was draining overboard. The engine was operated to full power using only the engine-driven fuel with no loss of power. The instructor stated the left engine quit as the dual-student flared for landing. The dual student initiated a go-around and the aircraft rolled uncontrollably to the left. As the instructor attempted to regain control, the dual-student froze on the controls. The instructor placed the left propeller in the feathered position and as he continued to attempt to gain control from the dual-student, the aircraft struck the ground left wing first and spun around coming to rest. The left engine and propeller were placed on a engine test stand after the accident and operated to full power with no evidence of mechanical failure or malfunction that would cause loss of power. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1998_MIA98LA232.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper
A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research)
Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace)
Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗